“Norms” as the noumenon, “functions” for use: A new idea of cultivated land administrative protection in China
In the 70 years since it has been founded, China’s cultivated land protection work has made remarkable achievements: less than 10% of the world’s cultivated land has fed 22% of the world’s population and 900 million peasants have the foundation on which to survive and develop. However, under the str...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-02-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1119936/full |
| _version_ | 1811170158073348096 |
|---|---|
| author | Lingling Li Haoran Gao Caixian Cui |
| author_facet | Lingling Li Haoran Gao Caixian Cui |
| author_sort | Lingling Li |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the 70 years since it has been founded, China’s cultivated land protection work has made remarkable achievements: less than 10% of the world’s cultivated land has fed 22% of the world’s population and 900 million peasants have the foundation on which to survive and develop. However, under the strictest protection system such as “Grow Teeth” (GT), there is still a deviation of “norm-value” and “demand-efficacy” in the Administrative Protection of Cultivated Land (APCL) at this stage. This paper uses normative analysis method, similar case research method as well as value analysis method to find that the legitimacy of the current APCL system is insufficient: on the one hand, under the perspective of functionalist “needs and efficacy”, the existing Cultivated Land Protection Law (Draft) (CLPL) and other normative documents cannot meet the needs of APCL penalties, relief, public welfare, etc.; On the other hand, from the perspective of normative “value legitimacy”, APCL legitimacy value foundation is lacking due to the limitations of overall value fragmentation, insufficient compatibility value and fragile defensive value. Therefore, the value base of APCL should be dismantled under the guidance of “function for use” to disassemble the functions of punishment, relief and public welfare, so as to specifically realize the construction of CLPL subjects, the inheritance of regulations, the transformation of responsibility subdivision, and the Land Administration Law and other regulatory continuations, to carry out protective measures such as clarifying the scope of punishment and giving compulsory force after coordination to cultivated land protection inspection recommendations, so as to give full play to the efficacy of APCL. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:52:32Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e6b3daa6f64046d68a161a2ce42985b7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2296-665X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:52:32Z |
| publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-e6b3daa6f64046d68a161a2ce42985b72023-02-07T14:08:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2023-02-011110.3389/fenvs.2023.11199361119936“Norms” as the noumenon, “functions” for use: A new idea of cultivated land administrative protection in ChinaLingling LiHaoran GaoCaixian CuiIn the 70 years since it has been founded, China’s cultivated land protection work has made remarkable achievements: less than 10% of the world’s cultivated land has fed 22% of the world’s population and 900 million peasants have the foundation on which to survive and develop. However, under the strictest protection system such as “Grow Teeth” (GT), there is still a deviation of “norm-value” and “demand-efficacy” in the Administrative Protection of Cultivated Land (APCL) at this stage. This paper uses normative analysis method, similar case research method as well as value analysis method to find that the legitimacy of the current APCL system is insufficient: on the one hand, under the perspective of functionalist “needs and efficacy”, the existing Cultivated Land Protection Law (Draft) (CLPL) and other normative documents cannot meet the needs of APCL penalties, relief, public welfare, etc.; On the other hand, from the perspective of normative “value legitimacy”, APCL legitimacy value foundation is lacking due to the limitations of overall value fragmentation, insufficient compatibility value and fragile defensive value. Therefore, the value base of APCL should be dismantled under the guidance of “function for use” to disassemble the functions of punishment, relief and public welfare, so as to specifically realize the construction of CLPL subjects, the inheritance of regulations, the transformation of responsibility subdivision, and the Land Administration Law and other regulatory continuations, to carry out protective measures such as clarifying the scope of punishment and giving compulsory force after coordination to cultivated land protection inspection recommendations, so as to give full play to the efficacy of APCL.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1119936/fullcultivated land protectionadministrative protectionlegitimacynormativeismfunctionalism |
| spellingShingle | Lingling Li Haoran Gao Caixian Cui “Norms” as the noumenon, “functions” for use: A new idea of cultivated land administrative protection in China Frontiers in Environmental Science cultivated land protection administrative protection legitimacy normativeism functionalism |
| title | “Norms” as the noumenon, “functions” for use: A new idea of cultivated land administrative protection in China |
| title_full | “Norms” as the noumenon, “functions” for use: A new idea of cultivated land administrative protection in China |
| title_fullStr | “Norms” as the noumenon, “functions” for use: A new idea of cultivated land administrative protection in China |
| title_full_unstemmed | “Norms” as the noumenon, “functions” for use: A new idea of cultivated land administrative protection in China |
| title_short | “Norms” as the noumenon, “functions” for use: A new idea of cultivated land administrative protection in China |
| title_sort | norms as the noumenon functions for use a new idea of cultivated land administrative protection in china |
| topic | cultivated land protection administrative protection legitimacy normativeism functionalism |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1119936/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT linglingli normsasthenoumenonfunctionsforuseanewideaofcultivatedlandadministrativeprotectioninchina AT haorangao normsasthenoumenonfunctionsforuseanewideaofcultivatedlandadministrativeprotectioninchina AT caixiancui normsasthenoumenonfunctionsforuseanewideaofcultivatedlandadministrativeprotectioninchina |