A Novel Way of Optimizing Headlight Distributions Based on Real Life Traffic and Eye Tracking Data <i>Part 1: Idealized Baseline Distribution</i>

In order to find optimized headlight distributions based on real traffic data, a three-step approach is chosen. Since the complete investigations are too extensive to fit into a single publication, this paper is the first in a series of three publications. Over three papers, a novel way to optimize...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonas Kobbert, Anil Erkan, John D. Bullough, Tran Quoc Khanh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/17/9908
_version_ 1797582833224515584
author Jonas Kobbert
Anil Erkan
John D. Bullough
Tran Quoc Khanh
author_facet Jonas Kobbert
Anil Erkan
John D. Bullough
Tran Quoc Khanh
author_sort Jonas Kobbert
collection DOAJ
description In order to find optimized headlight distributions based on real traffic data, a three-step approach is chosen. Since the complete investigations are too extensive to fit into a single publication, this paper is the first in a series of three publications. Over three papers, a novel way to optimize automotive headlight distributions based on real-life traffic and eye-tracking data is presented, based on 119 test subjects who participated in over 15,000 km of driving, including recordings of gaze behavior, light data, detection distances, and other objects in traffic. In the present paper, a baseline headlight distribution is derived from a series of detection tests conducted under ideal conditions, with a total of three tests, each with 19–30 subjects, conducted within the same test environment. In the first test, the influence of low beam intensity on the detection of pedestrians on the sidewalk (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>5.0</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula> from the center of the driving lane) is investigated. In the second test, the influence of different high beam intensities was investigated for the same detection task. In the third test, the headlight distribution and intensity are kept constant at a representative high beam level, but the detection task is changed. In this test, the pedestrian detection target is placed along different detection angles, ranging from immediately adjacent to the road (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>2.5</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula><inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>°</mo></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>) to <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>15.5</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula> away from the center of the driving lane (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>8.0</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula><inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>°</mo></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>). As mentioned, all of these tests were conducted under ideal conditions, with the studies taking place on an airfield with a <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1.2</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> km long straight road and normal road markings, but without oncoming traffic, tasks other than keeping the vehicle with cruise control within its lane, or other distracting objects present. The tests yielded two sets of data; the first is the intensity, based on the first two studies, needed to ensure sufficient intensity to detect objects under ideal conditions at distances needed for different driving speeds. The last test then uses these intensities and necessary variations in the required intensity to create an idealized, symmetric headlight distribution as a baseline for subsequent publications. Although the distribution applies only to passenger vehicles like the one used in the test, the same approach could be applied to other vehicle types. The second paper of this series will focus on real traffic objects and their distributions within the traffic space in order to identify relevant areas in headlight distribution when driving under real traffic conditions. The third paper of this series will analyze driver gaze distributions during real driving scenarios. The data from all three papers are used to create optimized headlight distributions, thereby showing how such an optimized distribution relates to current headlight distributions in terms of luminous flux, intensity, and overall distribution.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:28:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6b55bac92fe41ba9faacfc2745d893a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T23:28:10Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e6b55bac92fe41ba9faacfc2745d893a2023-11-19T07:53:22ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172023-09-011317990810.3390/app13179908A Novel Way of Optimizing Headlight Distributions Based on Real Life Traffic and Eye Tracking Data <i>Part 1: Idealized Baseline Distribution</i>Jonas Kobbert0Anil Erkan1John D. Bullough2Tran Quoc Khanh3AUDI AG, Auto-Union-Str. 1, 85057 Ingolstadt, GermanyLaboratory of Adaptive Lighting Systems and Visual Processing, Technical University of Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 4a, 64289 Darmstadt, GermanyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Light and Health Research Center, Population Health Science and Policy, 150 Broadway, Suite 560, Albany, NY 12204, USALaboratory of Adaptive Lighting Systems and Visual Processing, Technical University of Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 4a, 64289 Darmstadt, GermanyIn order to find optimized headlight distributions based on real traffic data, a three-step approach is chosen. Since the complete investigations are too extensive to fit into a single publication, this paper is the first in a series of three publications. Over three papers, a novel way to optimize automotive headlight distributions based on real-life traffic and eye-tracking data is presented, based on 119 test subjects who participated in over 15,000 km of driving, including recordings of gaze behavior, light data, detection distances, and other objects in traffic. In the present paper, a baseline headlight distribution is derived from a series of detection tests conducted under ideal conditions, with a total of three tests, each with 19–30 subjects, conducted within the same test environment. In the first test, the influence of low beam intensity on the detection of pedestrians on the sidewalk (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>5.0</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula> from the center of the driving lane) is investigated. In the second test, the influence of different high beam intensities was investigated for the same detection task. In the third test, the headlight distribution and intensity are kept constant at a representative high beam level, but the detection task is changed. In this test, the pedestrian detection target is placed along different detection angles, ranging from immediately adjacent to the road (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>2.5</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula><inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>°</mo></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>) to <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>15.5</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula> away from the center of the driving lane (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>8.0</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula><inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>°</mo></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>). As mentioned, all of these tests were conducted under ideal conditions, with the studies taking place on an airfield with a <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1.2</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> km long straight road and normal road markings, but without oncoming traffic, tasks other than keeping the vehicle with cruise control within its lane, or other distracting objects present. The tests yielded two sets of data; the first is the intensity, based on the first two studies, needed to ensure sufficient intensity to detect objects under ideal conditions at distances needed for different driving speeds. The last test then uses these intensities and necessary variations in the required intensity to create an idealized, symmetric headlight distribution as a baseline for subsequent publications. Although the distribution applies only to passenger vehicles like the one used in the test, the same approach could be applied to other vehicle types. The second paper of this series will focus on real traffic objects and their distributions within the traffic space in order to identify relevant areas in headlight distribution when driving under real traffic conditions. The third paper of this series will analyze driver gaze distributions during real driving scenarios. The data from all three papers are used to create optimized headlight distributions, thereby showing how such an optimized distribution relates to current headlight distributions in terms of luminous flux, intensity, and overall distribution.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/17/9908automotive lightingadaptive driving beamlight distributionseye trackinggaze distributionspedestrian
spellingShingle Jonas Kobbert
Anil Erkan
John D. Bullough
Tran Quoc Khanh
A Novel Way of Optimizing Headlight Distributions Based on Real Life Traffic and Eye Tracking Data <i>Part 1: Idealized Baseline Distribution</i>
Applied Sciences
automotive lighting
adaptive driving beam
light distributions
eye tracking
gaze distributions
pedestrian
title A Novel Way of Optimizing Headlight Distributions Based on Real Life Traffic and Eye Tracking Data <i>Part 1: Idealized Baseline Distribution</i>
title_full A Novel Way of Optimizing Headlight Distributions Based on Real Life Traffic and Eye Tracking Data <i>Part 1: Idealized Baseline Distribution</i>
title_fullStr A Novel Way of Optimizing Headlight Distributions Based on Real Life Traffic and Eye Tracking Data <i>Part 1: Idealized Baseline Distribution</i>
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Way of Optimizing Headlight Distributions Based on Real Life Traffic and Eye Tracking Data <i>Part 1: Idealized Baseline Distribution</i>
title_short A Novel Way of Optimizing Headlight Distributions Based on Real Life Traffic and Eye Tracking Data <i>Part 1: Idealized Baseline Distribution</i>
title_sort novel way of optimizing headlight distributions based on real life traffic and eye tracking data i part 1 idealized baseline distribution i
topic automotive lighting
adaptive driving beam
light distributions
eye tracking
gaze distributions
pedestrian
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/17/9908
work_keys_str_mv AT jonaskobbert anovelwayofoptimizingheadlightdistributionsbasedonreallifetrafficandeyetrackingdataipart1idealizedbaselinedistributioni
AT anilerkan anovelwayofoptimizingheadlightdistributionsbasedonreallifetrafficandeyetrackingdataipart1idealizedbaselinedistributioni
AT johndbullough anovelwayofoptimizingheadlightdistributionsbasedonreallifetrafficandeyetrackingdataipart1idealizedbaselinedistributioni
AT tranquockhanh anovelwayofoptimizingheadlightdistributionsbasedonreallifetrafficandeyetrackingdataipart1idealizedbaselinedistributioni
AT jonaskobbert novelwayofoptimizingheadlightdistributionsbasedonreallifetrafficandeyetrackingdataipart1idealizedbaselinedistributioni
AT anilerkan novelwayofoptimizingheadlightdistributionsbasedonreallifetrafficandeyetrackingdataipart1idealizedbaselinedistributioni
AT johndbullough novelwayofoptimizingheadlightdistributionsbasedonreallifetrafficandeyetrackingdataipart1idealizedbaselinedistributioni
AT tranquockhanh novelwayofoptimizingheadlightdistributionsbasedonreallifetrafficandeyetrackingdataipart1idealizedbaselinedistributioni