The Supreme Court in Miller – some early comments
<p>The UK Supreme Court’s decision in the Miller appeal was probably greeted with a sigh of relief in 10 Downing Street. Sure, the Government will now need to seek parliamentary approval for triggering Article 50 TEU and starting the formal process of withdrawing from the EU, but the much gre...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/the-supreme-court-in-miller-some-early-comments/ |
| _version_ | 1818189515681955840 |
|---|---|
| author | Tobias Lock |
| author_facet | Tobias Lock |
| author_sort | Tobias Lock |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>The UK Supreme Court’s decision in the Miller appeal was probably greeted with a sigh of relief in 10 Downing Street. Sure, the Government will now need to seek parliamentary approval for triggering Article 50 TEU and starting the formal process of withdrawing from the EU, but the much greater political danger of having to also seek the consent of the devolved parliaments of Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales, has not materialised. What follows are a few brief comments on the Supreme Court’s reasoning and an assessment of its implications for the future.</p>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:44:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e6dc3cff380342ce8e222b7aff4fd23c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:44:03Z |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-e6dc3cff380342ce8e222b7aff4fd23c2022-12-22T00:45:40ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044The Supreme Court in Miller – some early commentsTobias Lock<p>The UK Supreme Court’s decision in the Miller appeal was probably greeted with a sigh of relief in 10 Downing Street. Sure, the Government will now need to seek parliamentary approval for triggering Article 50 TEU and starting the formal process of withdrawing from the EU, but the much greater political danger of having to also seek the consent of the devolved parliaments of Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales, has not materialised. What follows are a few brief comments on the Supreme Court’s reasoning and an assessment of its implications for the future.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/the-supreme-court-in-miller-some-early-comments/brexit, Miller v. Secretary of State, Parliamentary Sovereignty, UK Supreme Court |
| spellingShingle | Tobias Lock The Supreme Court in Miller – some early comments Verfassungsblog brexit, Miller v. Secretary of State, Parliamentary Sovereignty, UK Supreme Court |
| title | The Supreme Court in Miller – some early comments |
| title_full | The Supreme Court in Miller – some early comments |
| title_fullStr | The Supreme Court in Miller – some early comments |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Supreme Court in Miller – some early comments |
| title_short | The Supreme Court in Miller – some early comments |
| title_sort | supreme court in miller some early comments |
| topic | brexit, Miller v. Secretary of State, Parliamentary Sovereignty, UK Supreme Court |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/the-supreme-court-in-miller-some-early-comments/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tobiaslock thesupremecourtinmillersomeearlycomments AT tobiaslock supremecourtinmillersomeearlycomments |