Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study

Background Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease; its diagnosis requires meeting both clinical and laboratory criteria. Prevalence rates of immunoglobulin (Ig) A anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and IgA anti-β 2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ 2 GPI) remain unknow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhenzhen Su MM, Zhuochun Huang MD, Jiuliang Zhao MD, Mengtao Li MD, Jing Hu BS, Xiaofeng Zeng MD, Chaojun Hu PhD, Bin Yang PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-04-01
Series:Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296221081129
_version_ 1811297652562722816
author Zhenzhen Su MM
Zhuochun Huang MD
Jiuliang Zhao MD
Mengtao Li MD
Jing Hu BS
Xiaofeng Zeng MD
Chaojun Hu PhD
Bin Yang PhD
author_facet Zhenzhen Su MM
Zhuochun Huang MD
Jiuliang Zhao MD
Mengtao Li MD
Jing Hu BS
Xiaofeng Zeng MD
Chaojun Hu PhD
Bin Yang PhD
author_sort Zhenzhen Su MM
collection DOAJ
description Background Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease; its diagnosis requires meeting both clinical and laboratory criteria. Prevalence rates of immunoglobulin (Ig) A anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and IgA anti-β 2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ 2 GPI) remain unknown, and the clinical value of these antibodies to APS classification remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to examine both items in the Chinese population. Methods Using chemiluminescence immunoassay, antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) were quantified in 12,582 hospital-based general population, 278 thrombotic APS patients, and 233 healthy controls. Results In the general population, the positive rates of IgA aCL and IgA aβ 2 GPI antibodies were 2.87% and 1.99%, respectively. Furthermore, isolated IgA aPL-positivity rate was 0.72% in patients with APS, which was comparable to those in the general population (0.68%, p  = 1) and in healthy controls (0.43%, p  = 1). Among the IgA aPL-positive individuals in the general population, isolated IgA-positive individuals had lower serum levels of IgA antibodies ( p  = 0.007 for IgA aCL and p  = 0.059 for IgA aβ 2 GPI). Regarding to APS classification, adding IgA aPL into conventional aPL assays may not improve and may even deteriorate the net reclassification index for APS; besides, no association between thrombosis and IgA aPL was observed. Conclusions this study assessed the prevalence of various aPL in Chinese population. IgA aPL may not enhance the classification ability of established laboratory criteria for thrombotic APS. Our data do not support the addition of IgA aPL to conventional aPL assays.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:08:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6e08345657643b4b9eee12f44193c2a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1938-2723
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:08:21Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
spelling doaj.art-e6e08345657643b4b9eee12f44193c2a2022-12-22T02:59:11ZengSAGE PublishingClinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis1938-27232022-04-012810.1177/10760296221081129Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center StudyZhenzhen Su MM0Zhuochun Huang MD1Jiuliang Zhao MD2Mengtao Li MD3Jing Hu BS4Xiaofeng Zeng MD5 Chaojun Hu PhD6Bin Yang PhD7 , Chengdu, China , Chengdu, China National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China , Chengdu, China National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China , Chengdu, ChinaBackground Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease; its diagnosis requires meeting both clinical and laboratory criteria. Prevalence rates of immunoglobulin (Ig) A anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and IgA anti-β 2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ 2 GPI) remain unknown, and the clinical value of these antibodies to APS classification remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to examine both items in the Chinese population. Methods Using chemiluminescence immunoassay, antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) were quantified in 12,582 hospital-based general population, 278 thrombotic APS patients, and 233 healthy controls. Results In the general population, the positive rates of IgA aCL and IgA aβ 2 GPI antibodies were 2.87% and 1.99%, respectively. Furthermore, isolated IgA aPL-positivity rate was 0.72% in patients with APS, which was comparable to those in the general population (0.68%, p  = 1) and in healthy controls (0.43%, p  = 1). Among the IgA aPL-positive individuals in the general population, isolated IgA-positive individuals had lower serum levels of IgA antibodies ( p  = 0.007 for IgA aCL and p  = 0.059 for IgA aβ 2 GPI). Regarding to APS classification, adding IgA aPL into conventional aPL assays may not improve and may even deteriorate the net reclassification index for APS; besides, no association between thrombosis and IgA aPL was observed. Conclusions this study assessed the prevalence of various aPL in Chinese population. IgA aPL may not enhance the classification ability of established laboratory criteria for thrombotic APS. Our data do not support the addition of IgA aPL to conventional aPL assays.https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296221081129
spellingShingle Zhenzhen Su MM
Zhuochun Huang MD
Jiuliang Zhao MD
Mengtao Li MD
Jing Hu BS
Xiaofeng Zeng MD
Chaojun Hu PhD
Bin Yang PhD
Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
title Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study
title_full Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study
title_fullStr Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study
title_short Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study
title_sort detection of iga antiphospholipid antibodies does not improve thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome classification a two center study
url https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296221081129
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenzhensumm detectionofigaantiphospholipidantibodiesdoesnotimprovethromboticantiphospholipidsyndromeclassificationatwocenterstudy
AT zhuochunhuangmd detectionofigaantiphospholipidantibodiesdoesnotimprovethromboticantiphospholipidsyndromeclassificationatwocenterstudy
AT jiuliangzhaomd detectionofigaantiphospholipidantibodiesdoesnotimprovethromboticantiphospholipidsyndromeclassificationatwocenterstudy
AT mengtaolimd detectionofigaantiphospholipidantibodiesdoesnotimprovethromboticantiphospholipidsyndromeclassificationatwocenterstudy
AT jinghubs detectionofigaantiphospholipidantibodiesdoesnotimprovethromboticantiphospholipidsyndromeclassificationatwocenterstudy
AT xiaofengzengmd detectionofigaantiphospholipidantibodiesdoesnotimprovethromboticantiphospholipidsyndromeclassificationatwocenterstudy
AT chaojunhuphd detectionofigaantiphospholipidantibodiesdoesnotimprovethromboticantiphospholipidsyndromeclassificationatwocenterstudy
AT binyangphd detectionofigaantiphospholipidantibodiesdoesnotimprovethromboticantiphospholipidsyndromeclassificationatwocenterstudy