Clinical Utility of Chest Computed Tomography in Patients with Rib Fractures CT Chest and Rib Fractures

Background Chest CT is more sensitive than a chest X-ray (CXR) in diagnosing rib fractures; however, the clinical significance of these fractures remains unclear. Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the added diagnostic use of chest C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chapman, Overbey, Tesfalidet, Schramm, Stovall, French, Johnson, Burlew, Barnett, Moore, Pieracci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kashan University of Medical Sciences 2016-09-01
Series:Archives of Trauma Research
Online Access: http://archtrauma.com/?page=article&article_id=37070
_version_ 1797700699801255936
author Chapman
Overbey
Tesfalidet
Schramm
Stovall
French
Johnson
Burlew
Barnett
Moore
Pieracci
author_facet Chapman
Overbey
Tesfalidet
Schramm
Stovall
French
Johnson
Burlew
Barnett
Moore
Pieracci
author_sort Chapman
collection DOAJ
description Background Chest CT is more sensitive than a chest X-ray (CXR) in diagnosing rib fractures; however, the clinical significance of these fractures remains unclear. Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the added diagnostic use of chest CT performed after CXR in patients with either known or suspected rib fractures secondary to blunt trauma. Methods Retrospective cohort study of blunt trauma patients with rib fractures at a level I trauma center that had both a CXR and a CT chest. The CT finding of ≥ 3 additional fractures in patients with ≤ 3 rib fractures on CXR was considered clinically meaningful. Student’s t-test and chi-square analysis were used for comparison. Results We identified 499 patients with rib fractures: 93 (18.6%) had CXR only, 7 (1.4%) had chest CT only, and 399 (79.9%) had both CXR and chest CT. Among these 399 patients, a total of 1,969 rib fractures were identified: 1,467 (74.5%) were missed by CXR. The median number of additional fractures identified by CT was 3 (range, 4 - 15). Of 212 (53.1%) patients with a clinically meaningful increase in the number of fractures, 68 patients underwent one or more clinical interventions: 36 SICU admissions, 20 pain catheter placements, 23 epidural placements, and 3 SSRF. Additionally, 70 patients had a chest tube placed for retained hemothorax or occult pneumothorax. Overall, 138 patients (34.5%) had a change in clinical management based upon CT chest. Conclusions The chest X-ray missed ~75% of rib fractures seen on chest CT. Although patients with a clinical meaningful increase in the number of rib fractures were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit, there was no associated improvement in pulmonary outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T04:26:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6ea160559cf4dec89bce2f336b5adb3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-953X
2251-9599
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T04:26:21Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Kashan University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Archives of Trauma Research
spelling doaj.art-e6ea160559cf4dec89bce2f336b5adb32023-09-03T10:24:15ZengKashan University of Medical SciencesArchives of Trauma Research2251-953X2251-95992016-09-015410.5812/atr.37070Clinical Utility of Chest Computed Tomography in Patients with Rib Fractures CT Chest and Rib FracturesChapmanOverbeyTesfalidetSchrammStovallFrenchJohnsonBurlewBarnettMoorePieracciBackground Chest CT is more sensitive than a chest X-ray (CXR) in diagnosing rib fractures; however, the clinical significance of these fractures remains unclear. Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the added diagnostic use of chest CT performed after CXR in patients with either known or suspected rib fractures secondary to blunt trauma. Methods Retrospective cohort study of blunt trauma patients with rib fractures at a level I trauma center that had both a CXR and a CT chest. The CT finding of ≥ 3 additional fractures in patients with ≤ 3 rib fractures on CXR was considered clinically meaningful. Student’s t-test and chi-square analysis were used for comparison. Results We identified 499 patients with rib fractures: 93 (18.6%) had CXR only, 7 (1.4%) had chest CT only, and 399 (79.9%) had both CXR and chest CT. Among these 399 patients, a total of 1,969 rib fractures were identified: 1,467 (74.5%) were missed by CXR. The median number of additional fractures identified by CT was 3 (range, 4 - 15). Of 212 (53.1%) patients with a clinically meaningful increase in the number of fractures, 68 patients underwent one or more clinical interventions: 36 SICU admissions, 20 pain catheter placements, 23 epidural placements, and 3 SSRF. Additionally, 70 patients had a chest tube placed for retained hemothorax or occult pneumothorax. Overall, 138 patients (34.5%) had a change in clinical management based upon CT chest. Conclusions The chest X-ray missed ~75% of rib fractures seen on chest CT. Although patients with a clinical meaningful increase in the number of rib fractures were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit, there was no associated improvement in pulmonary outcomes. http://archtrauma.com/?page=article&article_id=37070
spellingShingle Chapman
Overbey
Tesfalidet
Schramm
Stovall
French
Johnson
Burlew
Barnett
Moore
Pieracci
Clinical Utility of Chest Computed Tomography in Patients with Rib Fractures CT Chest and Rib Fractures
Archives of Trauma Research
title Clinical Utility of Chest Computed Tomography in Patients with Rib Fractures CT Chest and Rib Fractures
title_full Clinical Utility of Chest Computed Tomography in Patients with Rib Fractures CT Chest and Rib Fractures
title_fullStr Clinical Utility of Chest Computed Tomography in Patients with Rib Fractures CT Chest and Rib Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Utility of Chest Computed Tomography in Patients with Rib Fractures CT Chest and Rib Fractures
title_short Clinical Utility of Chest Computed Tomography in Patients with Rib Fractures CT Chest and Rib Fractures
title_sort clinical utility of chest computed tomography in patients with rib fractures ct chest and rib fractures
url http://archtrauma.com/?page=article&article_id=37070
work_keys_str_mv AT chapman clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT overbey clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT tesfalidet clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT schramm clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT stovall clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT french clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT johnson clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT burlew clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT barnett clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT moore clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures
AT pieracci clinicalutilityofchestcomputedtomographyinpatientswithribfracturesctchestandribfractures