Decisions by coin toss
In many situations of indeterminacy, where people agree that no decisive arguments favor one alternative to another, they are still strongly opposed to resolving the dilemma by a coin toss. The robustness of this judgment-decision discrepancy is demonstrated in several experiments, where factors lik...
Main Authors: | Gideon Keren, Karl H. Teigen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2010-04-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10203/jdm10203.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Decisions by coin toss: Inappropriate but fair
by: Gideon Keren, et al.
Published: (2010-04-01) -
Decision making under hypoxia: Oxygen depletion increases risk seeking for losses but not for gains
by: Tommaso Antonetti, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01) -
Computational Hardness of Collective Coin-Tossing Protocols
by: Hemanta K. Maji
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Facing expectations:
Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard
by: Christophe Heintz, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Measurement-induced focusing and the magnitude of loss aversion: The difference between comparing gains to losses and losses to gains
by: Ilja Van Beest, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01)