Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance

Abstract Introduction: The Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) seeks to improve population health by accelerating the translation of scientific discoveries in the laboratory and clinic into practices for the c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Latrice Rollins, Nicole Llewellyn, Manzi Ngaiza, Eric Nehl, Dorothy R. Carter, Jeff M. Sands
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120005427/type/journal_article
_version_ 1827995288181145600
author Latrice Rollins
Nicole Llewellyn
Manzi Ngaiza
Eric Nehl
Dorothy R. Carter
Jeff M. Sands
author_facet Latrice Rollins
Nicole Llewellyn
Manzi Ngaiza
Eric Nehl
Dorothy R. Carter
Jeff M. Sands
author_sort Latrice Rollins
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction: The Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) seeks to improve population health by accelerating the translation of scientific discoveries in the laboratory and clinic into practices for the community. CTSAs achieve this goal, in part, through their pilot project programs that fund promising early career investigators and innovative early-stage research projects across the translational research spectrum. However, there have been few reports on individual pilot projects and their impacts on the investigators who receive them and no studies on the long-term impact and outcomes of pilot projects. Methods: The Georgia CTSA funded 183 pilot projects from 2007 to 2015. We used a structured evaluation framework, the payback framework, to document the outcomes of 16 purposefully-selected pilot projects supported by the Georgia CTSA. We used a case study approach including bibliometric analyses of publications associated with the selected projects, document review, and investigator interviews. Results: These pilot projects had positive impact based on outcomes in five “payback categories”: (1) knowledge; (2) research targeting, capacity building, and absorption; (3) policy and product development; (4) health benefits; and (5) broader economic benefits. Conclusions: Results could inform our understanding of the diversity and breadth of outcomes resulting from Georgia CTSA-supported research and provide a framework for evaluating long-term pilot project outcomes across CTSAs.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:53:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6f7bf2712744a318e12bd89efd26766
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:53:08Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-e6f7bf2712744a318e12bd89efd267662023-03-09T12:31:03ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612021-01-01510.1017/cts.2020.542Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science AllianceLatrice Rollins0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-9653Nicole Llewellyn1Manzi Ngaiza2Eric Nehl3Dorothy R. Carter4Jeff M. Sands5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9822-0607Prevention Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAGeorgia Clinical & Translational Science Alliance, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAPrevention Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAGeorgia Clinical & Translational Science Alliance, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USADepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USAGeorgia Clinical & Translational Science Alliance, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA Abstract Introduction: The Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) seeks to improve population health by accelerating the translation of scientific discoveries in the laboratory and clinic into practices for the community. CTSAs achieve this goal, in part, through their pilot project programs that fund promising early career investigators and innovative early-stage research projects across the translational research spectrum. However, there have been few reports on individual pilot projects and their impacts on the investigators who receive them and no studies on the long-term impact and outcomes of pilot projects. Methods: The Georgia CTSA funded 183 pilot projects from 2007 to 2015. We used a structured evaluation framework, the payback framework, to document the outcomes of 16 purposefully-selected pilot projects supported by the Georgia CTSA. We used a case study approach including bibliometric analyses of publications associated with the selected projects, document review, and investigator interviews. Results: These pilot projects had positive impact based on outcomes in five “payback categories”: (1) knowledge; (2) research targeting, capacity building, and absorption; (3) policy and product development; (4) health benefits; and (5) broader economic benefits. Conclusions: Results could inform our understanding of the diversity and breadth of outcomes resulting from Georgia CTSA-supported research and provide a framework for evaluating long-term pilot project outcomes across CTSAs. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120005427/type/journal_articlePilot project programresearch paybackevaluationcase studiesCTSA program
spellingShingle Latrice Rollins
Nicole Llewellyn
Manzi Ngaiza
Eric Nehl
Dorothy R. Carter
Jeff M. Sands
Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Pilot project program
research payback
evaluation
case studies
CTSA program
title Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
title_full Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
title_fullStr Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
title_full_unstemmed Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
title_short Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
title_sort using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the georgia clinical and translational science alliance
topic Pilot project program
research payback
evaluation
case studies
CTSA program
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120005427/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT latricerollins usingthepaybackframeworktoevaluatetheoutcomesofpilotprojectssupportedbythegeorgiaclinicalandtranslationalsciencealliance
AT nicolellewellyn usingthepaybackframeworktoevaluatetheoutcomesofpilotprojectssupportedbythegeorgiaclinicalandtranslationalsciencealliance
AT manzingaiza usingthepaybackframeworktoevaluatetheoutcomesofpilotprojectssupportedbythegeorgiaclinicalandtranslationalsciencealliance
AT ericnehl usingthepaybackframeworktoevaluatetheoutcomesofpilotprojectssupportedbythegeorgiaclinicalandtranslationalsciencealliance
AT dorothyrcarter usingthepaybackframeworktoevaluatetheoutcomesofpilotprojectssupportedbythegeorgiaclinicalandtranslationalsciencealliance
AT jeffmsands usingthepaybackframeworktoevaluatetheoutcomesofpilotprojectssupportedbythegeorgiaclinicalandtranslationalsciencealliance