Radiative properties of flue gas under high-altitude sub-atmospheric pressure

The special geography of the plateau area leads to a series of problems in boiler operation. In this study, the absorption coefficients and total emissivity of flue gas were determined under different air pressures during air combustion using the Line-By-Line (LBL) method based on the HITEMP2010 dat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Defu CHE, Qiaopeng YAO, Jin WANG, Lingxiao DONG, Jiming YU, Yaodong DA, Lei DENG
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Office of Journal of China Coal Society 2024-03-01
Series:Meitan xuebao
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mtxb.com.cn/article/doi/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.ZZ23.1000
_version_ 1797230629769707520
author Defu CHE
Qiaopeng YAO
Jin WANG
Lingxiao DONG
Jiming YU
Yaodong DA
Lei DENG
author_facet Defu CHE
Qiaopeng YAO
Jin WANG
Lingxiao DONG
Jiming YU
Yaodong DA
Lei DENG
author_sort Defu CHE
collection DOAJ
description The special geography of the plateau area leads to a series of problems in boiler operation. In this study, the absorption coefficients and total emissivity of flue gas were determined under different air pressures during air combustion using the Line-By-Line (LBL) method based on the HITEMP2010 database (High-temperature molecular spectroscopic database). The effects of pressure, temperature, and molar fraction (H2O and CO2) on the radiative properties of flue gas were analyzed. An improved Weighted-Sum-of-Gray-Gases (WSGG) correlation, which relates the absorption coefficients to temperature and total pressure, was proposed. The results show that the reduced total pressure diminishes the total emissivity of flue gas. The maximum differences in total emissivity along the path lengths for the four working conditions with a pressure drop from 0.101 325 to 0.061 655 are 0.093 4, 0.084 5, 0.091 1, and 0.084 3, respectively. For a larger molar fraction, the effect of pressure on the total emissivity is greater for shorter path lengths but not for longer ones. Similarly, the higher temperature would reduce the total emissivity of flue gas. The maximum differences in total emissivity along the path lengths for the four working conditions with a temperature increase from 1 000 K to 2 500 K are 0.273 6, 0.270 5, 0.251 5, and 0.250 5, respectively. For a larger molar fraction, temperature has a greater effect on the total emissivity for shorter path lengths but not for longer ones. Furthermore, increasing the molar fraction enhances the total emissivity of flue gas. The maximum differences in total emissivity along the path lengths for the four working conditions with a molar fraction increase from 1 to 2 are 0.088 1, 0.100 4, 0.088 9, and 0.100 6, respectively. For a higher temperature or lower pressure, the effect of molar fraction on the total emissivity is smaller for shorter path lengths but greater for longer ones. The maximum relative error of the improved WSGG model for the total emissivity of flue gas under different working conditions is 3.67%. It is a significant reduction in the error compared to that of the existing WSGG model. Therefore, the improved WSGG model is more accurate for air combustion atmosphere and sub-atmospheric pressure.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:31:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e7047c9450b9454197c92f9dc0775d70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0253-9993
language zho
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:31:32Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Editorial Office of Journal of China Coal Society
record_format Article
series Meitan xuebao
spelling doaj.art-e7047c9450b9454197c92f9dc0775d702024-04-02T04:00:38ZzhoEditorial Office of Journal of China Coal SocietyMeitan xuebao0253-99932024-03-014921025103610.13225/j.cnki.jccs.ZZ23.1000ZZ23-1000Radiative properties of flue gas under high-altitude sub-atmospheric pressureDefu CHE0Qiaopeng YAO1Jin WANG2Lingxiao DONG3Jiming YU4Yaodong DA5Lei DENG6State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, ChinaChina Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Beijing 100029, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, ChinaThe special geography of the plateau area leads to a series of problems in boiler operation. In this study, the absorption coefficients and total emissivity of flue gas were determined under different air pressures during air combustion using the Line-By-Line (LBL) method based on the HITEMP2010 database (High-temperature molecular spectroscopic database). The effects of pressure, temperature, and molar fraction (H2O and CO2) on the radiative properties of flue gas were analyzed. An improved Weighted-Sum-of-Gray-Gases (WSGG) correlation, which relates the absorption coefficients to temperature and total pressure, was proposed. The results show that the reduced total pressure diminishes the total emissivity of flue gas. The maximum differences in total emissivity along the path lengths for the four working conditions with a pressure drop from 0.101 325 to 0.061 655 are 0.093 4, 0.084 5, 0.091 1, and 0.084 3, respectively. For a larger molar fraction, the effect of pressure on the total emissivity is greater for shorter path lengths but not for longer ones. Similarly, the higher temperature would reduce the total emissivity of flue gas. The maximum differences in total emissivity along the path lengths for the four working conditions with a temperature increase from 1 000 K to 2 500 K are 0.273 6, 0.270 5, 0.251 5, and 0.250 5, respectively. For a larger molar fraction, temperature has a greater effect on the total emissivity for shorter path lengths but not for longer ones. Furthermore, increasing the molar fraction enhances the total emissivity of flue gas. The maximum differences in total emissivity along the path lengths for the four working conditions with a molar fraction increase from 1 to 2 are 0.088 1, 0.100 4, 0.088 9, and 0.100 6, respectively. For a higher temperature or lower pressure, the effect of molar fraction on the total emissivity is smaller for shorter path lengths but greater for longer ones. The maximum relative error of the improved WSGG model for the total emissivity of flue gas under different working conditions is 3.67%. It is a significant reduction in the error compared to that of the existing WSGG model. Therefore, the improved WSGG model is more accurate for air combustion atmosphere and sub-atmospheric pressure.http://www.mtxb.com.cn/article/doi/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.ZZ23.1000flue gas radiationhigh-altitudesub-atmospheric pressureboilertotal emissivity
spellingShingle Defu CHE
Qiaopeng YAO
Jin WANG
Lingxiao DONG
Jiming YU
Yaodong DA
Lei DENG
Radiative properties of flue gas under high-altitude sub-atmospheric pressure
Meitan xuebao
flue gas radiation
high-altitude
sub-atmospheric pressure
boiler
total emissivity
title Radiative properties of flue gas under high-altitude sub-atmospheric pressure
title_full Radiative properties of flue gas under high-altitude sub-atmospheric pressure
title_fullStr Radiative properties of flue gas under high-altitude sub-atmospheric pressure
title_full_unstemmed Radiative properties of flue gas under high-altitude sub-atmospheric pressure
title_short Radiative properties of flue gas under high-altitude sub-atmospheric pressure
title_sort radiative properties of flue gas under high altitude sub atmospheric pressure
topic flue gas radiation
high-altitude
sub-atmospheric pressure
boiler
total emissivity
url http://www.mtxb.com.cn/article/doi/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.ZZ23.1000
work_keys_str_mv AT defuche radiativepropertiesoffluegasunderhighaltitudesubatmosphericpressure
AT qiaopengyao radiativepropertiesoffluegasunderhighaltitudesubatmosphericpressure
AT jinwang radiativepropertiesoffluegasunderhighaltitudesubatmosphericpressure
AT lingxiaodong radiativepropertiesoffluegasunderhighaltitudesubatmosphericpressure
AT jimingyu radiativepropertiesoffluegasunderhighaltitudesubatmosphericpressure
AT yaodongda radiativepropertiesoffluegasunderhighaltitudesubatmosphericpressure
AT leideng radiativepropertiesoffluegasunderhighaltitudesubatmosphericpressure