‘Bog here, marshland there’: tensions in co-producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the Arctic

Solar geoengineering has been suggested as a means to cool the planet and ameliorate climate impacts in the Arctic. However, few studies approach this idea from the viewpoint of Arctic communities. We explore the substantive rationale for public engagement with solar geoengineering research, includi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ilona Mettiäinen, Holly Jean Buck, Douglas G MacMartin, Katharine L Ricke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2022-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5715
_version_ 1797747110503776256
author Ilona Mettiäinen
Holly Jean Buck
Douglas G MacMartin
Katharine L Ricke
author_facet Ilona Mettiäinen
Holly Jean Buck
Douglas G MacMartin
Katharine L Ricke
author_sort Ilona Mettiäinen
collection DOAJ
description Solar geoengineering has been suggested as a means to cool the planet and ameliorate climate impacts in the Arctic. However, few studies approach this idea from the viewpoint of Arctic communities. We explore the substantive rationale for public engagement with solar geoengineering research, including the premises that: (a) evaluation of local impacts by communities can generate better knowledge about what modeling results mean; and (b) ideas and questions surfaced in public discussions can contribute to and shape scientific research. We convened focus groups in Finnish Lapland, conducted scientific analysis of climate model output on albedo modification based upon the discussions, and returned a year later to discuss the results. The increased granularity of scientific information highlighted the limited scientific basis for decisions, which turned the discussions back towards questions of ethics and justice. We conclude that while there are serious limitations to global public decision-making on climate intervention, in the absence of formal governance, co-producing research could act as one de facto form of governance.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:46:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e711d69e09c1448bab8cc92d8306b92b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:46:29Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-e711d69e09c1448bab8cc92d8306b92b2023-08-09T15:26:22ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262022-01-0117404500110.1088/1748-9326/ac5715‘Bog here, marshland there’: tensions in co-producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the ArcticIlona Mettiäinen0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2985-040XHolly Jean Buck1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8940-1238Douglas G MacMartin2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1987-9417Katharine L Ricke3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2780-7213Arctic Centre, University of Lapland , Rovaniemi, FinlandUniversity at Buffalo , Buffalo, NY, United States of AmericaCornell University , Ithaca, NY, United States of AmericaUniversity of California San Diego , San Diego, CA, United States of AmericaSolar geoengineering has been suggested as a means to cool the planet and ameliorate climate impacts in the Arctic. However, few studies approach this idea from the viewpoint of Arctic communities. We explore the substantive rationale for public engagement with solar geoengineering research, including the premises that: (a) evaluation of local impacts by communities can generate better knowledge about what modeling results mean; and (b) ideas and questions surfaced in public discussions can contribute to and shape scientific research. We convened focus groups in Finnish Lapland, conducted scientific analysis of climate model output on albedo modification based upon the discussions, and returned a year later to discuss the results. The increased granularity of scientific information highlighted the limited scientific basis for decisions, which turned the discussions back towards questions of ethics and justice. We conclude that while there are serious limitations to global public decision-making on climate intervention, in the absence of formal governance, co-producing research could act as one de facto form of governance.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5715climate changeArcticsolar geoengineeringsolar radiation managementpublic engagementco-production
spellingShingle Ilona Mettiäinen
Holly Jean Buck
Douglas G MacMartin
Katharine L Ricke
‘Bog here, marshland there’: tensions in co-producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the Arctic
Environmental Research Letters
climate change
Arctic
solar geoengineering
solar radiation management
public engagement
co-production
title ‘Bog here, marshland there’: tensions in co-producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the Arctic
title_full ‘Bog here, marshland there’: tensions in co-producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the Arctic
title_fullStr ‘Bog here, marshland there’: tensions in co-producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the Arctic
title_full_unstemmed ‘Bog here, marshland there’: tensions in co-producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the Arctic
title_short ‘Bog here, marshland there’: tensions in co-producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the Arctic
title_sort bog here marshland there tensions in co producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the arctic
topic climate change
Arctic
solar geoengineering
solar radiation management
public engagement
co-production
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5715
work_keys_str_mv AT ilonamettiainen bogheremarshlandtheretensionsincoproducingscientificknowledgeonsolargeoengineeringinthearctic
AT hollyjeanbuck bogheremarshlandtheretensionsincoproducingscientificknowledgeonsolargeoengineeringinthearctic
AT douglasgmacmartin bogheremarshlandtheretensionsincoproducingscientificknowledgeonsolargeoengineeringinthearctic
AT katharinelricke bogheremarshlandtheretensionsincoproducingscientificknowledgeonsolargeoengineeringinthearctic