THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL – INTELLIGENCE ANALYST REPORT – FORENSIC FINDINGS OR ANALYTICAL INFORMATION LEGAL AND INTELLIGENCE COMPARATIVE APPROACH

The need to generate this research raised up after an intelligence analyst’s report was identified and accepted as a document containing a forensic assessment and/or estimation during the process before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Namely, this рарег deals ,in one h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dragan Manojlović
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary 2012-12-01
Series:Pravo
Online Access:https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/238
_version_ 1818906514312658944
author Dragan Manojlović
author_facet Dragan Manojlović
author_sort Dragan Manojlović
collection DOAJ
description The need to generate this research raised up after an intelligence analyst’s report was identified and accepted as a document containing a forensic assessment and/or estimation during the process before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Namely, this рарег deals ,in one hand, with concepts of an intelligence analyst, his status and capacity of his report and, in other hand, with intelligence and forensic analysts and their relation from a criminal proceedings aspect. We find the reason for this in the fact that in the Tribunal criminal proceedings there is no clearly visible distinction between an investigative analyst, the forensic work based on the power of forensic (legality and legitimacy) and the forensic assessment and/or assessment given by an intelligence analyst and intelligence analysis findings as a product of an intelligence analysis process. This study points out that an intelligence analysis assessment is just a continuation of intelligence work in its cyclic process, as for an intelligence analyst flndings/report is just a method of intelligence work rather than a forensic assessment and/or estimation, as well as that an intelligence analysis is just a segment in an intelligence cycle, but not an independent forensic activity. It is not independent the activity of an expert in a criminal procedure.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:40:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e71318bc1f7f43ba9ab78a5037df855d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0352-3713
2683-5711
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:40:26Z
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher University Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary
record_format Article
series Pravo
spelling doaj.art-e71318bc1f7f43ba9ab78a5037df855d2022-12-21T20:04:41ZengUniversity Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and JudiciaryPravo0352-37132683-57112012-12-012910-12THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL – INTELLIGENCE ANALYST REPORT – FORENSIC FINDINGS OR ANALYTICAL INFORMATION LEGAL AND INTELLIGENCE COMPARATIVE APPROACHDragan Manojlović0Megatrend University In BelgradeThe need to generate this research raised up after an intelligence analyst’s report was identified and accepted as a document containing a forensic assessment and/or estimation during the process before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Namely, this рарег deals ,in one hand, with concepts of an intelligence analyst, his status and capacity of his report and, in other hand, with intelligence and forensic analysts and their relation from a criminal proceedings aspect. We find the reason for this in the fact that in the Tribunal criminal proceedings there is no clearly visible distinction between an investigative analyst, the forensic work based on the power of forensic (legality and legitimacy) and the forensic assessment and/or assessment given by an intelligence analyst and intelligence analysis findings as a product of an intelligence analysis process. This study points out that an intelligence analysis assessment is just a continuation of intelligence work in its cyclic process, as for an intelligence analyst flndings/report is just a method of intelligence work rather than a forensic assessment and/or estimation, as well as that an intelligence analysis is just a segment in an intelligence cycle, but not an independent forensic activity. It is not independent the activity of an expert in a criminal procedure.https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/238
spellingShingle Dragan Manojlović
THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL – INTELLIGENCE ANALYST REPORT – FORENSIC FINDINGS OR ANALYTICAL INFORMATION LEGAL AND INTELLIGENCE COMPARATIVE APPROACH
Pravo
title THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL – INTELLIGENCE ANALYST REPORT – FORENSIC FINDINGS OR ANALYTICAL INFORMATION LEGAL AND INTELLIGENCE COMPARATIVE APPROACH
title_full THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL – INTELLIGENCE ANALYST REPORT – FORENSIC FINDINGS OR ANALYTICAL INFORMATION LEGAL AND INTELLIGENCE COMPARATIVE APPROACH
title_fullStr THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL – INTELLIGENCE ANALYST REPORT – FORENSIC FINDINGS OR ANALYTICAL INFORMATION LEGAL AND INTELLIGENCE COMPARATIVE APPROACH
title_full_unstemmed THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL – INTELLIGENCE ANALYST REPORT – FORENSIC FINDINGS OR ANALYTICAL INFORMATION LEGAL AND INTELLIGENCE COMPARATIVE APPROACH
title_short THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL – INTELLIGENCE ANALYST REPORT – FORENSIC FINDINGS OR ANALYTICAL INFORMATION LEGAL AND INTELLIGENCE COMPARATIVE APPROACH
title_sort hague tribunal intelligence analyst report forensic findings or analytical information legal and intelligence comparative approach
url https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/238
work_keys_str_mv AT draganmanojlovic thehaguetribunalintelligenceanalystreportforensicfindingsoranalyticalinformationlegalandintelligencecomparativeapproach
AT draganmanojlovic haguetribunalintelligenceanalystreportforensicfindingsoranalyticalinformationlegalandintelligencecomparativeapproach