Vertical velocity at hydrostatic and anisotropic stresses

Sonic and dipole wireline tools measure Vp and Vs along the vertical direction. The state of stress in the subsurface is predominantly anisotropic, while most laboratory experiments measuring the dynamic elastic properties are conducted under hydrostatic stress. The question we ask is whether such l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arqam Muqtadir, Saud Al-Dughaimi, Taqi Alzaki, Jack Dvorkin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Earth Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.978647/full
_version_ 1811183126586589184
author Arqam Muqtadir
Saud Al-Dughaimi
Taqi Alzaki
Jack Dvorkin
author_facet Arqam Muqtadir
Saud Al-Dughaimi
Taqi Alzaki
Jack Dvorkin
author_sort Arqam Muqtadir
collection DOAJ
description Sonic and dipole wireline tools measure Vp and Vs along the vertical direction. The state of stress in the subsurface is predominantly anisotropic, while most laboratory experiments measuring the dynamic elastic properties are conducted under hydrostatic stress. The question we ask is whether such laboratory experiments provide the velocities that are close to those measured in the vertical wellbore where the stresses are anisotropic. To address this question, we conducted ultrasonic pulse transmission experiments on several room-dry rock samples. The comparison was made between the P- and S-wave velocities obtained at pure hydrostatic loading conditions and those at a smaller hydrostatic stress with added axial stress, so that the total stress along the axis of a cylindrical plug was the same as under pure hydrostatic loading. These differences were significant in the extreme case of only 1 MPa hydrostatic confining stress with the axial stress increasing up to 40 MPa. However, as the hydrostatic (confining) stress increased, the differences between the velocities along the axis of the sample became smaller and smaller. For example, at 1 MPa confining and 30 MPa axial stress, the relative difference in Vp was about 10%, while that in Vs was about 20%. However, at 10 MPa confining stress, these differences became about 3% and 6%, respectively, and further decreased as the confining stress increased. This means that even at strong in-situ contrasts between the vertical and horizontal stresses, the results of laboratory hydrostatic experiments can be used for in-situ velocity estimates. These results also appear to be consistent with a theoretical model that predicts the directional velocities at any triaxial stress conditions from those measured versus hydrostatic stress.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T09:42:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e71743e869774fcb88c8a198326a5e69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-6463
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T09:42:34Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Earth Science
spelling doaj.art-e71743e869774fcb88c8a198326a5e692022-12-22T04:31:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632022-08-011010.3389/feart.2022.978647978647Vertical velocity at hydrostatic and anisotropic stressesArqam MuqtadirSaud Al-DughaimiTaqi AlzakiJack DvorkinSonic and dipole wireline tools measure Vp and Vs along the vertical direction. The state of stress in the subsurface is predominantly anisotropic, while most laboratory experiments measuring the dynamic elastic properties are conducted under hydrostatic stress. The question we ask is whether such laboratory experiments provide the velocities that are close to those measured in the vertical wellbore where the stresses are anisotropic. To address this question, we conducted ultrasonic pulse transmission experiments on several room-dry rock samples. The comparison was made between the P- and S-wave velocities obtained at pure hydrostatic loading conditions and those at a smaller hydrostatic stress with added axial stress, so that the total stress along the axis of a cylindrical plug was the same as under pure hydrostatic loading. These differences were significant in the extreme case of only 1 MPa hydrostatic confining stress with the axial stress increasing up to 40 MPa. However, as the hydrostatic (confining) stress increased, the differences between the velocities along the axis of the sample became smaller and smaller. For example, at 1 MPa confining and 30 MPa axial stress, the relative difference in Vp was about 10%, while that in Vs was about 20%. However, at 10 MPa confining stress, these differences became about 3% and 6%, respectively, and further decreased as the confining stress increased. This means that even at strong in-situ contrasts between the vertical and horizontal stresses, the results of laboratory hydrostatic experiments can be used for in-situ velocity estimates. These results also appear to be consistent with a theoretical model that predicts the directional velocities at any triaxial stress conditions from those measured versus hydrostatic stress.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.978647/fullvelocityanisotropystresselastic modulihydrostatic
spellingShingle Arqam Muqtadir
Saud Al-Dughaimi
Taqi Alzaki
Jack Dvorkin
Vertical velocity at hydrostatic and anisotropic stresses
Frontiers in Earth Science
velocity
anisotropy
stress
elastic moduli
hydrostatic
title Vertical velocity at hydrostatic and anisotropic stresses
title_full Vertical velocity at hydrostatic and anisotropic stresses
title_fullStr Vertical velocity at hydrostatic and anisotropic stresses
title_full_unstemmed Vertical velocity at hydrostatic and anisotropic stresses
title_short Vertical velocity at hydrostatic and anisotropic stresses
title_sort vertical velocity at hydrostatic and anisotropic stresses
topic velocity
anisotropy
stress
elastic moduli
hydrostatic
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.978647/full
work_keys_str_mv AT arqammuqtadir verticalvelocityathydrostaticandanisotropicstresses
AT saudaldughaimi verticalvelocityathydrostaticandanisotropicstresses
AT taqialzaki verticalvelocityathydrostaticandanisotropicstresses
AT jackdvorkin verticalvelocityathydrostaticandanisotropicstresses