Colorimetric method as alternative to chromium (III) quantification in cattle feces

One of the main factors to establish productivity of grazing cattle is the estimation of forage intake. For this, the most widely used technique is based on the estimation of fecal output using chromium dioxide as external marker. However, quantification can be expensive and sometimes not precise du...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra Torres Ospina, Julian Andrés Zapata, Jesus Humberto Gil Gonzalez, Luis Giraldo, Diana Marcela Valencia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (Eduem) 2020-04-01
Series:Acta Scientiarum: Animal Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/48096
_version_ 1831750619405221888
author Alexandra Torres Ospina
Julian Andrés Zapata
Jesus Humberto Gil Gonzalez
Luis Giraldo
Diana Marcela Valencia
author_facet Alexandra Torres Ospina
Julian Andrés Zapata
Jesus Humberto Gil Gonzalez
Luis Giraldo
Diana Marcela Valencia
author_sort Alexandra Torres Ospina
collection DOAJ
description One of the main factors to establish productivity of grazing cattle is the estimation of forage intake. For this, the most widely used technique is based on the estimation of fecal output using chromium dioxide as external marker. However, quantification can be expensive and sometimes not precise due to the methodology used for this purpose. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate the colorimetric method for chromium quantification and to implement it in the estimation of fecal output in grazing cattle. The temperature, the digestion time and the wavelength for the measurement were evaluated. The method was validated for selectivity, linearity, detection and quantification limits, precision, accuracy, and stability. Results showed that temperature and digestion time are critical to improve sensitivity and quantification limits. The validation demonstrated that the method is suitable for the quantification of Cr2O3 in a wide range of concentrations, being statistically comparable with a reference method, and offering a reliable low cost and easy to implement alternative, to estimate fecal output in bovine digestibility studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:30:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e728d6da5d2740f0a1b072b3afc12067
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1806-2636
1807-8672
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:30:52Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (Eduem)
record_format Article
series Acta Scientiarum: Animal Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e728d6da5d2740f0a1b072b3afc120672022-12-21T18:48:06ZengEditora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (Eduem)Acta Scientiarum: Animal Sciences1806-26361807-86722020-04-0142e48096e4809610.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.4809648096Colorimetric method as alternative to chromium (III) quantification in cattle fecesAlexandra Torres Ospina0Julian Andrés Zapata1Jesus Humberto Gil Gonzalez2Luis Giraldo3Diana Marcela Valencia4Universidad Nacional de ColombiaUniversidad de AntioquiaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaCentro de Investigación el NusOne of the main factors to establish productivity of grazing cattle is the estimation of forage intake. For this, the most widely used technique is based on the estimation of fecal output using chromium dioxide as external marker. However, quantification can be expensive and sometimes not precise due to the methodology used for this purpose. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate the colorimetric method for chromium quantification and to implement it in the estimation of fecal output in grazing cattle. The temperature, the digestion time and the wavelength for the measurement were evaluated. The method was validated for selectivity, linearity, detection and quantification limits, precision, accuracy, and stability. Results showed that temperature and digestion time are critical to improve sensitivity and quantification limits. The validation demonstrated that the method is suitable for the quantification of Cr2O3 in a wide range of concentrations, being statistically comparable with a reference method, and offering a reliable low cost and easy to implement alternative, to estimate fecal output in bovine digestibility studies.http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/48096spectrophotometry; fecal output; external marker; chromium dioxide; validation.
spellingShingle Alexandra Torres Ospina
Julian Andrés Zapata
Jesus Humberto Gil Gonzalez
Luis Giraldo
Diana Marcela Valencia
Colorimetric method as alternative to chromium (III) quantification in cattle feces
Acta Scientiarum: Animal Sciences
spectrophotometry; fecal output; external marker; chromium dioxide; validation.
title Colorimetric method as alternative to chromium (III) quantification in cattle feces
title_full Colorimetric method as alternative to chromium (III) quantification in cattle feces
title_fullStr Colorimetric method as alternative to chromium (III) quantification in cattle feces
title_full_unstemmed Colorimetric method as alternative to chromium (III) quantification in cattle feces
title_short Colorimetric method as alternative to chromium (III) quantification in cattle feces
title_sort colorimetric method as alternative to chromium iii quantification in cattle feces
topic spectrophotometry; fecal output; external marker; chromium dioxide; validation.
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/48096
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandratorresospina colorimetricmethodasalternativetochromiumiiiquantificationincattlefeces
AT julianandreszapata colorimetricmethodasalternativetochromiumiiiquantificationincattlefeces
AT jesushumbertogilgonzalez colorimetricmethodasalternativetochromiumiiiquantificationincattlefeces
AT luisgiraldo colorimetricmethodasalternativetochromiumiiiquantificationincattlefeces
AT dianamarcelavalencia colorimetricmethodasalternativetochromiumiiiquantificationincattlefeces