The Problem with Inventing Molecular Mechanisms to Fit Thermodynamic Equations of Muscle

Almost every model of muscle contraction in the literature to date is a molecular power stroke model, even though this corpuscular mechanism is opposed by centuries of science, by 85 years of unrefuted evidence that muscle is a thermodynamic system, and by a quarter century of direct observations th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Josh Baker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/20/15439
_version_ 1797573593518833664
author Josh Baker
author_facet Josh Baker
author_sort Josh Baker
collection DOAJ
description Almost every model of muscle contraction in the literature to date is a molecular power stroke model, even though this corpuscular mechanism is opposed by centuries of science, by 85 years of unrefuted evidence that muscle is a thermodynamic system, and by a quarter century of direct observations that the molecular mechanism of muscle contraction is a molecular switch, not a molecular power stroke. An ensemble of molecular switches is a binary mechanical thermodynamic system from which A.V. Hill’s muscle force–velocity relationship is directly derived, where Hill’s parameter <i>a</i> is the internal force against which unloaded muscle shortens, and Hill’s parameter <i>b</i> is the product of the switch displacement, <i>d</i>, and the actin–myosin ATPase rate. Ignoring this model and the centuries of thermodynamics that preceded it, corpuscularians continue to develop molecular power stroke models, adding to their 65-year jumble of “new”, “innovative”, and “unconventional” molecular mechanisms for Hill’s <i>a</i> and <i>b</i> parameters, none of which resemble the underlying physical chemistry. Remarkably, the corpuscularian community holds the thermodynamicist to account for these discrepancies, which, as outlined here, I have done for 25 years. It is long past time for corpuscularians to be held accountable for their mechanisms, which by all accounts have no foundation in science. The stakes are high. Molecular power stroke models are widely used in research and in clinical decision-making and have, for over half a century, muddied our understanding of the inner workings of one of the most efficient and clean-burning machines on the planet. It is problematic that corpuscularians present these models to stakeholders as science when in fact corpuscularians have been actively defending these models against science for decades. The path forward for scientists is to stop baseless rejections of muscle thermodynamics and to begin testing corpuscular and thermodynamic mechanisms with the goal of disproving one or the other of these hypotheses.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T21:12:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e72e425d25544ebfb096dca4a2f2f9ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T21:12:16Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e72e425d25544ebfb096dca4a2f2f9ea2023-11-19T16:46:44ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1661-65961422-00672023-10-0124201543910.3390/ijms242015439The Problem with Inventing Molecular Mechanisms to Fit Thermodynamic Equations of MuscleJosh Baker0School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USAAlmost every model of muscle contraction in the literature to date is a molecular power stroke model, even though this corpuscular mechanism is opposed by centuries of science, by 85 years of unrefuted evidence that muscle is a thermodynamic system, and by a quarter century of direct observations that the molecular mechanism of muscle contraction is a molecular switch, not a molecular power stroke. An ensemble of molecular switches is a binary mechanical thermodynamic system from which A.V. Hill’s muscle force–velocity relationship is directly derived, where Hill’s parameter <i>a</i> is the internal force against which unloaded muscle shortens, and Hill’s parameter <i>b</i> is the product of the switch displacement, <i>d</i>, and the actin–myosin ATPase rate. Ignoring this model and the centuries of thermodynamics that preceded it, corpuscularians continue to develop molecular power stroke models, adding to their 65-year jumble of “new”, “innovative”, and “unconventional” molecular mechanisms for Hill’s <i>a</i> and <i>b</i> parameters, none of which resemble the underlying physical chemistry. Remarkably, the corpuscularian community holds the thermodynamicist to account for these discrepancies, which, as outlined here, I have done for 25 years. It is long past time for corpuscularians to be held accountable for their mechanisms, which by all accounts have no foundation in science. The stakes are high. Molecular power stroke models are widely used in research and in clinical decision-making and have, for over half a century, muddied our understanding of the inner workings of one of the most efficient and clean-burning machines on the planet. It is problematic that corpuscularians present these models to stakeholders as science when in fact corpuscularians have been actively defending these models against science for decades. The path forward for scientists is to stop baseless rejections of muscle thermodynamics and to begin testing corpuscular and thermodynamic mechanisms with the goal of disproving one or the other of these hypotheses.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/20/15439thermodynamicsmusclemyosinactinmotorforce
spellingShingle Josh Baker
The Problem with Inventing Molecular Mechanisms to Fit Thermodynamic Equations of Muscle
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
thermodynamics
muscle
myosin
actin
motor
force
title The Problem with Inventing Molecular Mechanisms to Fit Thermodynamic Equations of Muscle
title_full The Problem with Inventing Molecular Mechanisms to Fit Thermodynamic Equations of Muscle
title_fullStr The Problem with Inventing Molecular Mechanisms to Fit Thermodynamic Equations of Muscle
title_full_unstemmed The Problem with Inventing Molecular Mechanisms to Fit Thermodynamic Equations of Muscle
title_short The Problem with Inventing Molecular Mechanisms to Fit Thermodynamic Equations of Muscle
title_sort problem with inventing molecular mechanisms to fit thermodynamic equations of muscle
topic thermodynamics
muscle
myosin
actin
motor
force
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/20/15439
work_keys_str_mv AT joshbaker theproblemwithinventingmolecularmechanismstofitthermodynamicequationsofmuscle
AT joshbaker problemwithinventingmolecularmechanismstofitthermodynamicequationsofmuscle