The “real life” efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in CRSwNP

Abstract Background Dupilumab significantly improves symptom control in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients with large polyps at the initiation of treatment (total polyp score (TPS) ≥ 5) have been the focus in published studies. Patients with significant burden of disease but...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas J. Campion, Jonas Brugger, Aldine Tu, Victoria Stanek, Faris F. Brkic, Tina J. Bartosik, David T. Liu, Bruna S. Hoehl, Katharina Gangl, Julia Eckl-Dorna, Sven Schneider
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-09-01
Series:Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00663-4
_version_ 1797689158694600704
author Nicholas J. Campion
Jonas Brugger
Aldine Tu
Victoria Stanek
Faris F. Brkic
Tina J. Bartosik
David T. Liu
Bruna S. Hoehl
Katharina Gangl
Julia Eckl-Dorna
Sven Schneider
author_facet Nicholas J. Campion
Jonas Brugger
Aldine Tu
Victoria Stanek
Faris F. Brkic
Tina J. Bartosik
David T. Liu
Bruna S. Hoehl
Katharina Gangl
Julia Eckl-Dorna
Sven Schneider
author_sort Nicholas J. Campion
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Dupilumab significantly improves symptom control in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients with large polyps at the initiation of treatment (total polyp score (TPS) ≥ 5) have been the focus in published studies. Patients with significant burden of disease but small polyps (TPS ≤ 4) have not yet been evaluated for clinical response. This study set out to evaluate the benefit of dupilumab treatment on cohorts of small (TPS ≤ 4) compared to large polyps (TPS ≥ 5). Furthermore, benefit of concomitant oral and/or nasal steroid therapy has been evaluated. Methods 97 patients with CRSwNP, who were begun on dupilumab between January 2020 and October 2021, were included. All patients were followed-up for 6 months. At each visit they underwent nasal endoscopy, smell identification tests and filled out validated patient questionnaires. Results Significant drops in TPS were seen in both patient groups after 6 months of therapy, dropping from a median score of 3 to 0 and from 6 to 2 in patients with small and large polyps respectively. Furthermore, a linear mixed model calculated a drop of 22% and 24% in TPS per month in patients with small and large polyps respectively with no significant difference in rate of decline. Finally the model showed that neither oral nor nasal steroids influenced the rate of response to dupilumab therapy. Conclusions Polyp size at the initiation of dupilumab therapy and whether patients continue to take steroid therapy does not appear to influence effectiveness of dupilumab treatment.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T01:41:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e730ba670eb247d6bbd81c8bb7b22b86
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1916-0216
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T01:41:57Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
spelling doaj.art-e730ba670eb247d6bbd81c8bb7b22b862023-09-10T11:20:06ZengBMCJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1916-02162023-09-0152111210.1186/s40463-023-00663-4The “real life” efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in CRSwNPNicholas J. Campion0Jonas Brugger1Aldine Tu2Victoria Stanek3Faris F. Brkic4Tina J. Bartosik5David T. Liu6Bruna S. Hoehl7Katharina Gangl8Julia Eckl-Dorna9Sven Schneider10Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of ViennaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Research Laboratories 8H, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of ViennaAbstract Background Dupilumab significantly improves symptom control in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients with large polyps at the initiation of treatment (total polyp score (TPS) ≥ 5) have been the focus in published studies. Patients with significant burden of disease but small polyps (TPS ≤ 4) have not yet been evaluated for clinical response. This study set out to evaluate the benefit of dupilumab treatment on cohorts of small (TPS ≤ 4) compared to large polyps (TPS ≥ 5). Furthermore, benefit of concomitant oral and/or nasal steroid therapy has been evaluated. Methods 97 patients with CRSwNP, who were begun on dupilumab between January 2020 and October 2021, were included. All patients were followed-up for 6 months. At each visit they underwent nasal endoscopy, smell identification tests and filled out validated patient questionnaires. Results Significant drops in TPS were seen in both patient groups after 6 months of therapy, dropping from a median score of 3 to 0 and from 6 to 2 in patients with small and large polyps respectively. Furthermore, a linear mixed model calculated a drop of 22% and 24% in TPS per month in patients with small and large polyps respectively with no significant difference in rate of decline. Finally the model showed that neither oral nor nasal steroids influenced the rate of response to dupilumab therapy. Conclusions Polyp size at the initiation of dupilumab therapy and whether patients continue to take steroid therapy does not appear to influence effectiveness of dupilumab treatment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00663-4Chronic rhinosinusitisCRSwNPNasal polypAsthmaBiological treatment
spellingShingle Nicholas J. Campion
Jonas Brugger
Aldine Tu
Victoria Stanek
Faris F. Brkic
Tina J. Bartosik
David T. Liu
Bruna S. Hoehl
Katharina Gangl
Julia Eckl-Dorna
Sven Schneider
The “real life” efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in CRSwNP
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Chronic rhinosinusitis
CRSwNP
Nasal polyp
Asthma
Biological treatment
title The “real life” efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in CRSwNP
title_full The “real life” efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in CRSwNP
title_fullStr The “real life” efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in CRSwNP
title_full_unstemmed The “real life” efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in CRSwNP
title_short The “real life” efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in CRSwNP
title_sort real life efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in crswnp
topic Chronic rhinosinusitis
CRSwNP
Nasal polyp
Asthma
Biological treatment
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00663-4
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasjcampion thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT jonasbrugger thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT aldinetu thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT victoriastanek thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT farisfbrkic thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT tinajbartosik thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT davidtliu thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT brunashoehl thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT katharinagangl thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT juliaeckldorna thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT svenschneider thereallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT nicholasjcampion reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT jonasbrugger reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT aldinetu reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT victoriastanek reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT farisfbrkic reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT tinajbartosik reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT davidtliu reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT brunashoehl reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT katharinagangl reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT juliaeckldorna reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp
AT svenschneider reallifeefficacyofdupilumabisindependentofinitialpolypsizeandconcomitantsteroidsincrswnp