Agency and reward across development and in autism: A free-choice paradigm.
Our ability to perform voluntary actions and make choices is shaped by the motivation from control over the resulting effects (agency) and from positive outcomes (reward). The underlying action-outcome binding mechanisms rely on sensorimotor abilities that specialise through child development and un...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284407 |
| _version_ | 1797843144254947328 |
|---|---|
| author | Irene Valori Laura Carnevali Teresa Farroni |
| author_facet | Irene Valori Laura Carnevali Teresa Farroni |
| author_sort | Irene Valori |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Our ability to perform voluntary actions and make choices is shaped by the motivation from control over the resulting effects (agency) and from positive outcomes (reward). The underlying action-outcome binding mechanisms rely on sensorimotor abilities that specialise through child development and undergo different trajectories in autism. The study aimed at disentangling the role of agency and reward in driving action selection of autistic and non-autistic children and adults, who were asked to freely select one of three candies and feed the animals appearing on a tablet. The candies were associated with different probabilities of delivering a neutral vs no effect (agency task), or a positive vs neutral effect (reward task). Choices and reaction times (RT) were measured to understand whether participants preferred and were faster at selecting options with higher probability of producing a neutral vs. no effect (agency) or a positive vs. neutral effect (reward). Participants' choices and RT were not affected by agency, whereas a more frequent selection of the option with higher probability of a positive vs. neutral effect emerged across groups, thus suggesting a reward effect. Autistic participants selected less frequently the option with chance level of receiving a neutral or no effect, which could be interpreted as a sign of reduced tolerance of uncertainty. Across tasks, conditions and age groups, autistic participants presented shorter RT, which is a marker of reduced action planning and control. Future research should deepen how tolerance of uncertainty, action planning and control impact the way autistic individuals make choices in everyday life situations, potentially contributing to restricted and repetitive behaviours. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:00:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e734ecc7f2bc4908aa13814b870b6df0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:00:03Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-e734ecc7f2bc4908aa13814b870b6df02023-04-21T05:33:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01184e028440710.1371/journal.pone.0284407Agency and reward across development and in autism: A free-choice paradigm.Irene ValoriLaura CarnevaliTeresa FarroniOur ability to perform voluntary actions and make choices is shaped by the motivation from control over the resulting effects (agency) and from positive outcomes (reward). The underlying action-outcome binding mechanisms rely on sensorimotor abilities that specialise through child development and undergo different trajectories in autism. The study aimed at disentangling the role of agency and reward in driving action selection of autistic and non-autistic children and adults, who were asked to freely select one of three candies and feed the animals appearing on a tablet. The candies were associated with different probabilities of delivering a neutral vs no effect (agency task), or a positive vs neutral effect (reward task). Choices and reaction times (RT) were measured to understand whether participants preferred and were faster at selecting options with higher probability of producing a neutral vs. no effect (agency) or a positive vs. neutral effect (reward). Participants' choices and RT were not affected by agency, whereas a more frequent selection of the option with higher probability of a positive vs. neutral effect emerged across groups, thus suggesting a reward effect. Autistic participants selected less frequently the option with chance level of receiving a neutral or no effect, which could be interpreted as a sign of reduced tolerance of uncertainty. Across tasks, conditions and age groups, autistic participants presented shorter RT, which is a marker of reduced action planning and control. Future research should deepen how tolerance of uncertainty, action planning and control impact the way autistic individuals make choices in everyday life situations, potentially contributing to restricted and repetitive behaviours.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284407 |
| spellingShingle | Irene Valori Laura Carnevali Teresa Farroni Agency and reward across development and in autism: A free-choice paradigm. PLoS ONE |
| title | Agency and reward across development and in autism: A free-choice paradigm. |
| title_full | Agency and reward across development and in autism: A free-choice paradigm. |
| title_fullStr | Agency and reward across development and in autism: A free-choice paradigm. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Agency and reward across development and in autism: A free-choice paradigm. |
| title_short | Agency and reward across development and in autism: A free-choice paradigm. |
| title_sort | agency and reward across development and in autism a free choice paradigm |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284407 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT irenevalori agencyandrewardacrossdevelopmentandinautismafreechoiceparadigm AT lauracarnevali agencyandrewardacrossdevelopmentandinautismafreechoiceparadigm AT teresafarroni agencyandrewardacrossdevelopmentandinautismafreechoiceparadigm |