The efficacy and safety of BM-PHA for the correction of nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial

Background: Multiple types of fillers have been developed for soft tissue augmentation. Objective: We investigated the efficacy and safety of the novel filler BM-PHA. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, split-face study, 91 participants received injections of BM-PHA and Restylane Perlane (PER)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seung Hwan Paik, Myoung Eun Choi, Woo Jin Lee, Sung Eun Chang, Mi Woo Lee, Jee Ho Choi, Beom Joon Kim, Chong Hyun Won
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1623859
_version_ 1797683674328596480
author Seung Hwan Paik
Myoung Eun Choi
Woo Jin Lee
Sung Eun Chang
Mi Woo Lee
Jee Ho Choi
Beom Joon Kim
Chong Hyun Won
author_facet Seung Hwan Paik
Myoung Eun Choi
Woo Jin Lee
Sung Eun Chang
Mi Woo Lee
Jee Ho Choi
Beom Joon Kim
Chong Hyun Won
author_sort Seung Hwan Paik
collection DOAJ
description Background: Multiple types of fillers have been developed for soft tissue augmentation. Objective: We investigated the efficacy and safety of the novel filler BM-PHA. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, split-face study, 91 participants received injections of BM-PHA and Restylane Perlane (PER) into the nasolabial folds. Efficacy was determined by the improvements in the Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) and Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and safety by adverse events, laboratory tests, and a check of vital signs. Results: WSRS scores assessed by independent evaluators at Week 24, the primary efficacy measure, showed no significant difference between the two treatments. The treatments also showed no significant differences in WSRS scores assessed by the evaluators at Week 8 and WSRS and GAIS scores assessed by the treating investigators and participants at Weeks 8 and 24. The proportion of nasolabial folds whose WSRS scores improved by at least one grade at Week 24 was similar between the treatments. Only minor local side effects were reported without sequelae. Conclusion: BM-PHA was not inferior to PER in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds and may be an appropriate alternative product for their improvement. Further studies are needed to confirm the long-term safety of BM-PHA.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:18:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e738d446a09847d5b27eafed05c58d76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0954-6634
1471-1753
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:18:35Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Dermatological Treatment
spelling doaj.art-e738d446a09847d5b27eafed05c58d762023-09-15T14:23:02ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Dermatological Treatment0954-66341471-17532021-01-013219510010.1080/09546634.2019.16238591623859The efficacy and safety of BM-PHA for the correction of nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trialSeung Hwan Paik0Myoung Eun Choi1Woo Jin Lee2Sung Eun Chang3Mi Woo Lee4Jee Ho Choi5Beom Joon Kim6Chong Hyun Won7University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterChung-Ang University College of MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterBackground: Multiple types of fillers have been developed for soft tissue augmentation. Objective: We investigated the efficacy and safety of the novel filler BM-PHA. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, split-face study, 91 participants received injections of BM-PHA and Restylane Perlane (PER) into the nasolabial folds. Efficacy was determined by the improvements in the Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) and Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and safety by adverse events, laboratory tests, and a check of vital signs. Results: WSRS scores assessed by independent evaluators at Week 24, the primary efficacy measure, showed no significant difference between the two treatments. The treatments also showed no significant differences in WSRS scores assessed by the evaluators at Week 8 and WSRS and GAIS scores assessed by the treating investigators and participants at Weeks 8 and 24. The proportion of nasolabial folds whose WSRS scores improved by at least one grade at Week 24 was similar between the treatments. Only minor local side effects were reported without sequelae. Conclusion: BM-PHA was not inferior to PER in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds and may be an appropriate alternative product for their improvement. Further studies are needed to confirm the long-term safety of BM-PHA.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1623859bm-phahyaluronic acidnasolabial fold
spellingShingle Seung Hwan Paik
Myoung Eun Choi
Woo Jin Lee
Sung Eun Chang
Mi Woo Lee
Jee Ho Choi
Beom Joon Kim
Chong Hyun Won
The efficacy and safety of BM-PHA for the correction of nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
bm-pha
hyaluronic acid
nasolabial fold
title The efficacy and safety of BM-PHA for the correction of nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial
title_full The efficacy and safety of BM-PHA for the correction of nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of BM-PHA for the correction of nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of BM-PHA for the correction of nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial
title_short The efficacy and safety of BM-PHA for the correction of nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of bm pha for the correction of nasolabial folds a multicenter randomized double blind split face clinical trial
topic bm-pha
hyaluronic acid
nasolabial fold
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1623859
work_keys_str_mv AT seunghwanpaik theefficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT myoungeunchoi theefficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT woojinlee theefficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT sungeunchang theefficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT miwoolee theefficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT jeehochoi theefficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT beomjoonkim theefficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT chonghyunwon theefficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT seunghwanpaik efficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT myoungeunchoi efficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT woojinlee efficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT sungeunchang efficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT miwoolee efficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT jeehochoi efficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT beomjoonkim efficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT chonghyunwon efficacyandsafetyofbmphaforthecorrectionofnasolabialfoldsamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindsplitfaceclinicaltrial