Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro Study
Introduction: The digitalisation of dental models has made significant contribution to the current success of orthodontic practices. Rapid Prototyping (RP) is an innovative method of producing physical objects based on Computer-Aided Design (CAD) Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM). Aim: To compare...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17516/59169_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(HB_OM)_PFA(SS)_PB(HB_SS)_PN(SS).pdf |
| _version_ | 1827991040900988928 |
|---|---|
| author | Ankita M Mohite Lalita G Nanjannawar Jiwanasha M Agrawal Sangamesh Fulari Shraddha Shetti Vishwal Kagi Amol Shirkande Sanjivani Gofane |
| author_facet | Ankita M Mohite Lalita G Nanjannawar Jiwanasha M Agrawal Sangamesh Fulari Shraddha Shetti Vishwal Kagi Amol Shirkande Sanjivani Gofane |
| author_sort | Ankita M Mohite |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: The digitalisation of dental models has made significant contribution to the current success of orthodontic practices. Rapid Prototyping (RP) is an innovative method of producing physical objects based on Computer-Aided Design (CAD) Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM).
Aim: To compare the accuracy of the Three-Dimensional (3D) printed rapid prototyped models with orthodontic stone models across different ranges of crowding.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study carried out at the Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India during September 2019 to September 2020. A total of 36 rapid prototyped models were reconstructed from stone models using Light Emitting Diode (LED) scanner and Digital Light Processing (DLP) technology. Dental stone models and RP models were evaluated using digital caliper for different linear measurements and arch dimensions. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. To evaluate accuracy, t-test analyses and Bland-Altman plotting were performed.
Results: T-test showed statistically non significant difference in all parameters of measurements of RP models when compared to stone models. According to Bland-Altman plotting. The mean difference between stone and RP models for the various degree of crowding was minimal and within ±0.07 mm in all planes.
Conclusion: Discrepancy between dental plaster models and RP models were less than 0.5 mm which was considered clinically non significant. Suggesting that RP models can be effectively used as an alternative to stone models. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:44:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e74d3cd9af1a4e0a892231d13d9842c7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2249-782X 0973-709X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:44:29Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-e74d3cd9af1a4e0a892231d13d9842c72023-03-14T04:44:57ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2023-03-01173ZC01ZC0510.7860/JCDR/2023/59169.17516Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro StudyAnkita M Mohite0Lalita G Nanjannawar1Jiwanasha M Agrawal 2Sangamesh Fulari3Shraddha Shetti4Vishwal Kagi5Amol Shirkande6Sanjivani Gofane7Postgraduate, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed To Be University, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed To Be University, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.Professor and Head, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed To Be University, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed To Be University, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed To Be University, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed To Be University, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed To Be University, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.Postgraduate, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed To Be University, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.Introduction: The digitalisation of dental models has made significant contribution to the current success of orthodontic practices. Rapid Prototyping (RP) is an innovative method of producing physical objects based on Computer-Aided Design (CAD) Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM). Aim: To compare the accuracy of the Three-Dimensional (3D) printed rapid prototyped models with orthodontic stone models across different ranges of crowding. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study carried out at the Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India during September 2019 to September 2020. A total of 36 rapid prototyped models were reconstructed from stone models using Light Emitting Diode (LED) scanner and Digital Light Processing (DLP) technology. Dental stone models and RP models were evaluated using digital caliper for different linear measurements and arch dimensions. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. To evaluate accuracy, t-test analyses and Bland-Altman plotting were performed. Results: T-test showed statistically non significant difference in all parameters of measurements of RP models when compared to stone models. According to Bland-Altman plotting. The mean difference between stone and RP models for the various degree of crowding was minimal and within ±0.07 mm in all planes. Conclusion: Discrepancy between dental plaster models and RP models were less than 0.5 mm which was considered clinically non significant. Suggesting that RP models can be effectively used as an alternative to stone models.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17516/59169_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(HB_OM)_PFA(SS)_PB(HB_SS)_PN(SS).pdfdigital orthodonticsstereolithographythree-dimensional printing |
| spellingShingle | Ankita M Mohite Lalita G Nanjannawar Jiwanasha M Agrawal Sangamesh Fulari Shraddha Shetti Vishwal Kagi Amol Shirkande Sanjivani Gofane Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro Study Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research digital orthodontics stereolithography three-dimensional printing |
| title | Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro Study |
| title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro Study |
| title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro Study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of accuracy of reconstructed 3d printed rapid prototyping models and conventional stone models with different ranges of crowding an in vitro study |
| topic | digital orthodontics stereolithography three-dimensional printing |
| url | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17516/59169_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(HB_OM)_PFA(SS)_PB(HB_SS)_PN(SS).pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ankitammohite comparativeevaluationofaccuracyofreconstructed3dprintedrapidprototypingmodelsandconventionalstonemodelswithdifferentrangesofcrowdinganinvitrostudy AT lalitagnanjannawar comparativeevaluationofaccuracyofreconstructed3dprintedrapidprototypingmodelsandconventionalstonemodelswithdifferentrangesofcrowdinganinvitrostudy AT jiwanashamagrawal comparativeevaluationofaccuracyofreconstructed3dprintedrapidprototypingmodelsandconventionalstonemodelswithdifferentrangesofcrowdinganinvitrostudy AT sangameshfulari comparativeevaluationofaccuracyofreconstructed3dprintedrapidprototypingmodelsandconventionalstonemodelswithdifferentrangesofcrowdinganinvitrostudy AT shraddhashetti comparativeevaluationofaccuracyofreconstructed3dprintedrapidprototypingmodelsandconventionalstonemodelswithdifferentrangesofcrowdinganinvitrostudy AT vishwalkagi comparativeevaluationofaccuracyofreconstructed3dprintedrapidprototypingmodelsandconventionalstonemodelswithdifferentrangesofcrowdinganinvitrostudy AT amolshirkande comparativeevaluationofaccuracyofreconstructed3dprintedrapidprototypingmodelsandconventionalstonemodelswithdifferentrangesofcrowdinganinvitrostudy AT sanjivanigofane comparativeevaluationofaccuracyofreconstructed3dprintedrapidprototypingmodelsandconventionalstonemodelswithdifferentrangesofcrowdinganinvitrostudy |