DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement

Against increasing injunctions in research governance to create open data, and knee-jerk rejections from qualitative researchers in response to such efforts, we explore a radical counter movement of academics engaged in what we term “DIY Academic Archiving,” the creation of open and accessible archi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martina Karels, Mary Hanlon, Niamh Moore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1374663/full
_version_ 1827299296307838976
author Martina Karels
Mary Hanlon
Niamh Moore
author_facet Martina Karels
Mary Hanlon
Niamh Moore
author_sort Martina Karels
collection DOAJ
description Against increasing injunctions in research governance to create open data, and knee-jerk rejections from qualitative researchers in response to such efforts, we explore a radical counter movement of academics engaged in what we term “DIY Academic Archiving,” the creation of open and accessible archives of their research materials. We turn to interviews with three DIY academic archivists, each drawing on an ethos of community archiving, as opposed to emerging open data schemes: Melissa Munn on The Gaucher/Munn Penal Press Collection,1 Eric Gonzaba’s Wearing Gay History,2 and Michael Goodman’s Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive.3 We see these archives as engaged in a “politics of refusal,” which challenges both conventional methods and ethics in qualitative research as well as new moves toward open data. On the one hand, academics are tasked to “protect” their data by destroying it, under the guise of a supposed mode of “care.” On the other hand, open data makes quite contrary demands, to care for data by making it “open” for further extraction through (re)use. DIY Academic Archiving is a practice of refusal that supports a redirection away from this binary. In this article, we explore how DIY academic archivists play with coding as a form of mischievous disruption, and so are contributing to new data imaginaries. We offer insight into how DIY Academic Archiving supports researchers in their theoretical, methodological and political commitments, and at the same time, how it can enable researchers to take the care-full risk of archiving our research data.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:30:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e756c9308d66427a962e23fc6286ae78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-900X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:30:25Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Communication
spelling doaj.art-e756c9308d66427a962e23fc6286ae782024-04-02T04:30:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2024-04-01910.3389/fcomm.2024.13746631374663DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movementMartina Karels0Mary Hanlon1Niamh Moore2Department of Media and Communication, St. Francis College, Brooklyn, NY, United StatesDepartment of Sociology, Okanagan College, Kelowna, BC, CanadaDepartment of Sociology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomAgainst increasing injunctions in research governance to create open data, and knee-jerk rejections from qualitative researchers in response to such efforts, we explore a radical counter movement of academics engaged in what we term “DIY Academic Archiving,” the creation of open and accessible archives of their research materials. We turn to interviews with three DIY academic archivists, each drawing on an ethos of community archiving, as opposed to emerging open data schemes: Melissa Munn on The Gaucher/Munn Penal Press Collection,1 Eric Gonzaba’s Wearing Gay History,2 and Michael Goodman’s Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive.3 We see these archives as engaged in a “politics of refusal,” which challenges both conventional methods and ethics in qualitative research as well as new moves toward open data. On the one hand, academics are tasked to “protect” their data by destroying it, under the guise of a supposed mode of “care.” On the other hand, open data makes quite contrary demands, to care for data by making it “open” for further extraction through (re)use. DIY Academic Archiving is a practice of refusal that supports a redirection away from this binary. In this article, we explore how DIY academic archivists play with coding as a form of mischievous disruption, and so are contributing to new data imaginaries. We offer insight into how DIY Academic Archiving supports researchers in their theoretical, methodological and political commitments, and at the same time, how it can enable researchers to take the care-full risk of archiving our research data.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1374663/fullDIY academic archivingrefusalfeminist ethic of careresearch ethicsreuse of qualitative dataopen data
spellingShingle Martina Karels
Mary Hanlon
Niamh Moore
DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement
Frontiers in Communication
DIY academic archiving
refusal
feminist ethic of care
research ethics
reuse of qualitative data
open data
title DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement
title_full DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement
title_fullStr DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement
title_full_unstemmed DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement
title_short DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement
title_sort diy academic archiving mischievous disruptions of a new counter movement
topic DIY academic archiving
refusal
feminist ethic of care
research ethics
reuse of qualitative data
open data
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1374663/full
work_keys_str_mv AT martinakarels diyacademicarchivingmischievousdisruptionsofanewcountermovement
AT maryhanlon diyacademicarchivingmischievousdisruptionsofanewcountermovement
AT niamhmoore diyacademicarchivingmischievousdisruptionsofanewcountermovement