DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement
Against increasing injunctions in research governance to create open data, and knee-jerk rejections from qualitative researchers in response to such efforts, we explore a radical counter movement of academics engaged in what we term “DIY Academic Archiving,” the creation of open and accessible archi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1374663/full |
_version_ | 1827299296307838976 |
---|---|
author | Martina Karels Mary Hanlon Niamh Moore |
author_facet | Martina Karels Mary Hanlon Niamh Moore |
author_sort | Martina Karels |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Against increasing injunctions in research governance to create open data, and knee-jerk rejections from qualitative researchers in response to such efforts, we explore a radical counter movement of academics engaged in what we term “DIY Academic Archiving,” the creation of open and accessible archives of their research materials. We turn to interviews with three DIY academic archivists, each drawing on an ethos of community archiving, as opposed to emerging open data schemes: Melissa Munn on The Gaucher/Munn Penal Press Collection,1 Eric Gonzaba’s Wearing Gay History,2 and Michael Goodman’s Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive.3 We see these archives as engaged in a “politics of refusal,” which challenges both conventional methods and ethics in qualitative research as well as new moves toward open data. On the one hand, academics are tasked to “protect” their data by destroying it, under the guise of a supposed mode of “care.” On the other hand, open data makes quite contrary demands, to care for data by making it “open” for further extraction through (re)use. DIY Academic Archiving is a practice of refusal that supports a redirection away from this binary. In this article, we explore how DIY academic archivists play with coding as a form of mischievous disruption, and so are contributing to new data imaginaries. We offer insight into how DIY Academic Archiving supports researchers in their theoretical, methodological and political commitments, and at the same time, how it can enable researchers to take the care-full risk of archiving our research data. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T15:30:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e756c9308d66427a962e23fc6286ae78 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2297-900X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T15:30:25Z |
publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Communication |
spelling | doaj.art-e756c9308d66427a962e23fc6286ae782024-04-02T04:30:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2024-04-01910.3389/fcomm.2024.13746631374663DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movementMartina Karels0Mary Hanlon1Niamh Moore2Department of Media and Communication, St. Francis College, Brooklyn, NY, United StatesDepartment of Sociology, Okanagan College, Kelowna, BC, CanadaDepartment of Sociology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomAgainst increasing injunctions in research governance to create open data, and knee-jerk rejections from qualitative researchers in response to such efforts, we explore a radical counter movement of academics engaged in what we term “DIY Academic Archiving,” the creation of open and accessible archives of their research materials. We turn to interviews with three DIY academic archivists, each drawing on an ethos of community archiving, as opposed to emerging open data schemes: Melissa Munn on The Gaucher/Munn Penal Press Collection,1 Eric Gonzaba’s Wearing Gay History,2 and Michael Goodman’s Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive.3 We see these archives as engaged in a “politics of refusal,” which challenges both conventional methods and ethics in qualitative research as well as new moves toward open data. On the one hand, academics are tasked to “protect” their data by destroying it, under the guise of a supposed mode of “care.” On the other hand, open data makes quite contrary demands, to care for data by making it “open” for further extraction through (re)use. DIY Academic Archiving is a practice of refusal that supports a redirection away from this binary. In this article, we explore how DIY academic archivists play with coding as a form of mischievous disruption, and so are contributing to new data imaginaries. We offer insight into how DIY Academic Archiving supports researchers in their theoretical, methodological and political commitments, and at the same time, how it can enable researchers to take the care-full risk of archiving our research data.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1374663/fullDIY academic archivingrefusalfeminist ethic of careresearch ethicsreuse of qualitative dataopen data |
spellingShingle | Martina Karels Mary Hanlon Niamh Moore DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement Frontiers in Communication DIY academic archiving refusal feminist ethic of care research ethics reuse of qualitative data open data |
title | DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement |
title_full | DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement |
title_fullStr | DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement |
title_full_unstemmed | DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement |
title_short | DIY academic archiving: mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement |
title_sort | diy academic archiving mischievous disruptions of a new counter movement |
topic | DIY academic archiving refusal feminist ethic of care research ethics reuse of qualitative data open data |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1374663/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinakarels diyacademicarchivingmischievousdisruptionsofanewcountermovement AT maryhanlon diyacademicarchivingmischievousdisruptionsofanewcountermovement AT niamhmoore diyacademicarchivingmischievousdisruptionsofanewcountermovement |