Long‐Term Bias Stability of the GOES‐NOP Magnetometers

Abstract We characterize the long‐term bias stability of the GOES‐NOP series magnetometers (GOES‐13, 14, and 15) using data from 2013 through 2018. Bias stability is inferred using three methods: comparing the inboard and outboard measurements on each spacecraft, comparing the individual measurement...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Califf, F. J. Rich, T. M. Loto'aniu, H. J. Singer, R. J. Redmon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2023-11-01
Series:Earth and Space Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003035
_version_ 1827631238613041152
author S. Califf
F. J. Rich
T. M. Loto'aniu
H. J. Singer
R. J. Redmon
author_facet S. Califf
F. J. Rich
T. M. Loto'aniu
H. J. Singer
R. J. Redmon
author_sort S. Califf
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We characterize the long‐term bias stability of the GOES‐NOP series magnetometers (GOES‐13, 14, and 15) using data from 2013 through 2018. Bias stability is inferred using three methods: comparing the inboard and outboard measurements on each spacecraft, comparing the individual measurements to the TS04 magnetic field model, and comparing measurements between different GOES‐NOP spacecraft. Comparisons between the inboard and outboard magnetometers demonstrate that GOES‐14 and GOES‐15 measurements are stable within approximately 1–2 nT. The GOES‐13 inboard magnetometer has known contamination issues that hinder a useful inboard/outboard comparison, but inter‐spacecraft comparisons with GOES‐14 and GOES‐15 indicate that the GOES‐13 outboard magnetometer is also stable to 1–2 nT. Direct comparisons of each measurement to the TS04 magnetic field model support the conclusion that there is little long‐term bias drift over the 6‐year period. Model uncertainty and the variability of the field at geostationary orbit create a noise floor that is similar to the variability of the magnetometer biases. While these relative comparisons do not provide absolute measurement uncertainty, they do constrain the stability of the observations, allowing for future absolute calibration of the DC bias through different methods.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:18:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e75a295354de49e9b7f11124c99e87ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2333-5084
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:18:11Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Earth and Space Science
spelling doaj.art-e75a295354de49e9b7f11124c99e87ca2023-11-28T20:18:31ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842023-11-011011n/an/a10.1029/2023EA003035Long‐Term Bias Stability of the GOES‐NOP MagnetometersS. Califf0F. J. Rich1T. M. Loto'aniu2H. J. Singer3R. J. Redmon4Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences Boulder CO USALincoln Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lexington MA USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences Boulder CO USANOAA Space Weather Prediction Center Boulder CO USANOAA National Centers for Environmental Information Boulder CO USAAbstract We characterize the long‐term bias stability of the GOES‐NOP series magnetometers (GOES‐13, 14, and 15) using data from 2013 through 2018. Bias stability is inferred using three methods: comparing the inboard and outboard measurements on each spacecraft, comparing the individual measurements to the TS04 magnetic field model, and comparing measurements between different GOES‐NOP spacecraft. Comparisons between the inboard and outboard magnetometers demonstrate that GOES‐14 and GOES‐15 measurements are stable within approximately 1–2 nT. The GOES‐13 inboard magnetometer has known contamination issues that hinder a useful inboard/outboard comparison, but inter‐spacecraft comparisons with GOES‐14 and GOES‐15 indicate that the GOES‐13 outboard magnetometer is also stable to 1–2 nT. Direct comparisons of each measurement to the TS04 magnetic field model support the conclusion that there is little long‐term bias drift over the 6‐year period. Model uncertainty and the variability of the field at geostationary orbit create a noise floor that is similar to the variability of the magnetometer biases. While these relative comparisons do not provide absolute measurement uncertainty, they do constrain the stability of the observations, allowing for future absolute calibration of the DC bias through different methods.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003035magnetometerGOEScalibration
spellingShingle S. Califf
F. J. Rich
T. M. Loto'aniu
H. J. Singer
R. J. Redmon
Long‐Term Bias Stability of the GOES‐NOP Magnetometers
Earth and Space Science
magnetometer
GOES
calibration
title Long‐Term Bias Stability of the GOES‐NOP Magnetometers
title_full Long‐Term Bias Stability of the GOES‐NOP Magnetometers
title_fullStr Long‐Term Bias Stability of the GOES‐NOP Magnetometers
title_full_unstemmed Long‐Term Bias Stability of the GOES‐NOP Magnetometers
title_short Long‐Term Bias Stability of the GOES‐NOP Magnetometers
title_sort long term bias stability of the goes nop magnetometers
topic magnetometer
GOES
calibration
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003035
work_keys_str_mv AT scaliff longtermbiasstabilityofthegoesnopmagnetometers
AT fjrich longtermbiasstabilityofthegoesnopmagnetometers
AT tmlotoaniu longtermbiasstabilityofthegoesnopmagnetometers
AT hjsinger longtermbiasstabilityofthegoesnopmagnetometers
AT rjredmon longtermbiasstabilityofthegoesnopmagnetometers