The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013–16

<b>Background:</b> Hybrid nutrient density scores are based on both nutrients and selected food groups. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the new hybrid nutrient-rich food NRFh 4:3:3 score to other nutrient-rich food (NRF) scores, energy density, and energy cost and to model the i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam Drewnowski, Jessica Smith, Victor L. Fulgoni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/5/1734
_version_ 1797533447610171392
author Adam Drewnowski
Jessica Smith
Victor L. Fulgoni
author_facet Adam Drewnowski
Jessica Smith
Victor L. Fulgoni
author_sort Adam Drewnowski
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background:</b> Hybrid nutrient density scores are based on both nutrients and selected food groups. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the new hybrid nutrient-rich food NRFh 4:3:3 score to other nutrient-rich food (NRF) scores, energy density, and energy cost and to model the impact on the Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) of partially replacing less nutrient-rich with more nutrient-rich foods. <b>Methods:</b> Analyses were based on 5870 foods and beverages in the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies and on 24 h dietary recalls from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013–16). The NRFh 4:3:3 model was based on four nutrients to encourage (protein fiber, potassium, MUFA + PUFA); three food groups to encourage (dairy, fruit, whole grains); and three nutrients to limit (saturated fat, added sugar, sodium). Ratings generated by NRFh 4:3:3 and by other NRF models were correlated with score components, energy density (kcal/100 g), and energy cost (USD/100 kcal). The impact on HEI-2015 of replacing foods in the lowest nutrient density tertile (T1) with top tertile (T3) foods at 10%, 20%, 30%, and 100% equicaloric replacement was modeled using NHANES 2013–16 dietary data by population subgroups. <b>Results:</b> The NRFh 4:3:3 model awarded higher scores to foods containing dairy, fruit, and whole grains and proportionately lower scores to vegetables when compared to the NRF 9.3 model. Higher NRF and NRFh nutrient density scores were linked to lower energy density and higher energy cost; however, both correlations were lower for the NRFh 4:3:3. Isocaloric replacement of bottom tertile with top tertile foods as rated by both models led to significantly higher HEI-2105 values, based on complete (100%) and on partial (10–30%) replacement. <b>Conclusion:</b> The new NRFh 4:3:3 model provides the basis for developing new metrics of affordable nutrient density. The model identified “best value” food categories that were both affordable and nutrient-rich. Total and partial replacement of low nutrient density with high nutrient density foods was associated with higher HEI-2015 scores, suggesting that even partial inclusion of more nutrient dense foods in the diet may have an important impact on total diet quality.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:14:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e76335dd61ea4753be5bb92470474ca0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6643
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:14:40Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nutrients
spelling doaj.art-e76335dd61ea4753be5bb92470474ca02023-11-21T20:32:49ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432021-05-01135173410.3390/nu13051734The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013–16Adam Drewnowski0Jessica Smith1Victor L. Fulgoni2Center for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Box 353410, Seattle, WA 98195, USAGeneral Mills Scientific and Regulatory Affairs, Minneapolis, MN 55426, USANutrition Impact LLC, Battle Creek, MI 49014, USA<b>Background:</b> Hybrid nutrient density scores are based on both nutrients and selected food groups. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the new hybrid nutrient-rich food NRFh 4:3:3 score to other nutrient-rich food (NRF) scores, energy density, and energy cost and to model the impact on the Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) of partially replacing less nutrient-rich with more nutrient-rich foods. <b>Methods:</b> Analyses were based on 5870 foods and beverages in the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies and on 24 h dietary recalls from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013–16). The NRFh 4:3:3 model was based on four nutrients to encourage (protein fiber, potassium, MUFA + PUFA); three food groups to encourage (dairy, fruit, whole grains); and three nutrients to limit (saturated fat, added sugar, sodium). Ratings generated by NRFh 4:3:3 and by other NRF models were correlated with score components, energy density (kcal/100 g), and energy cost (USD/100 kcal). The impact on HEI-2015 of replacing foods in the lowest nutrient density tertile (T1) with top tertile (T3) foods at 10%, 20%, 30%, and 100% equicaloric replacement was modeled using NHANES 2013–16 dietary data by population subgroups. <b>Results:</b> The NRFh 4:3:3 model awarded higher scores to foods containing dairy, fruit, and whole grains and proportionately lower scores to vegetables when compared to the NRF 9.3 model. Higher NRF and NRFh nutrient density scores were linked to lower energy density and higher energy cost; however, both correlations were lower for the NRFh 4:3:3. Isocaloric replacement of bottom tertile with top tertile foods as rated by both models led to significantly higher HEI-2105 values, based on complete (100%) and on partial (10–30%) replacement. <b>Conclusion:</b> The new NRFh 4:3:3 model provides the basis for developing new metrics of affordable nutrient density. The model identified “best value” food categories that were both affordable and nutrient-rich. Total and partial replacement of low nutrient density with high nutrient density foods was associated with higher HEI-2015 scores, suggesting that even partial inclusion of more nutrient dense foods in the diet may have an important impact on total diet quality.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/5/1734nutrient profilinghybrid nutrient density scorewhole grainfruitdairyNHANES 2013–16
spellingShingle Adam Drewnowski
Jessica Smith
Victor L. Fulgoni
The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013–16
Nutrients
nutrient profiling
hybrid nutrient density score
whole grain
fruit
dairy
NHANES 2013–16
title The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013–16
title_full The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013–16
title_fullStr The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013–16
title_full_unstemmed The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013–16
title_short The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013–16
title_sort new hybrid nutrient density score nrfh 4 3 3 tested in relation to affordable nutrient density and healthy eating index 2015 analyses of nhanes data 2013 16
topic nutrient profiling
hybrid nutrient density score
whole grain
fruit
dairy
NHANES 2013–16
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/5/1734
work_keys_str_mv AT adamdrewnowski thenewhybridnutrientdensityscorenrfh433testedinrelationtoaffordablenutrientdensityandhealthyeatingindex2015analysesofnhanesdata201316
AT jessicasmith thenewhybridnutrientdensityscorenrfh433testedinrelationtoaffordablenutrientdensityandhealthyeatingindex2015analysesofnhanesdata201316
AT victorlfulgoni thenewhybridnutrientdensityscorenrfh433testedinrelationtoaffordablenutrientdensityandhealthyeatingindex2015analysesofnhanesdata201316
AT adamdrewnowski newhybridnutrientdensityscorenrfh433testedinrelationtoaffordablenutrientdensityandhealthyeatingindex2015analysesofnhanesdata201316
AT jessicasmith newhybridnutrientdensityscorenrfh433testedinrelationtoaffordablenutrientdensityandhealthyeatingindex2015analysesofnhanesdata201316
AT victorlfulgoni newhybridnutrientdensityscorenrfh433testedinrelationtoaffordablenutrientdensityandhealthyeatingindex2015analysesofnhanesdata201316