Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4, Garmin Vivosmart 4, and WHOOP Versus Polysomnography: Systematic Review
Abstract BackgroundDespite being the gold-standard method for objectively assessing sleep, polysomnography (PSG) faces several limitations as it is expensive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive; requires various equipment and technical expertise; and is impractical for long-t...
Main Authors: | An-Marie Schyvens, Nina Catharina Van Oost, Jean-Marie Aerts, Federica Masci, Brent Peters, An Neven, Hélène Dirix, Geert Wets, Veerle Ross, Johan Verbraecken |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2024-03-01
|
Series: | JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
Online Access: | https://mhealth.jmir.org/2024/1/e52192 |
Similar Items
-
Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort
by: Tedesco, Salvatore, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart® HR and StepWatch™ 3 for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions
by: Frederik Rose Svarre, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Validation of Fitbit Charge 4 for assessing sleep in Chinese patients with chronic insomnia: A comparison against polysomnography and actigraphy
by: Xiaofang Dong, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Validation of Fitbit Charge 4 for assessing sleep in Chinese patients with chronic insomnia: A comparison against polysomnography and actigraphy.
by: Xiaofang Dong, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Comparison of raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph, Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit using a mechanical shaker table.
by: James W White, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)