DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS OF STRUCTURALISM AND POSTSTRUCTURALISM IN SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE XX CENTURY
The article presents a brief analysis of the ideas of the 20th century thinkers M. Foucault and J. Derrida in relation to the ideas of structuralism and poststructuralism, their similarity, difference and development of the discourse of structuralism as the main direction of socio-philosophical thou...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Science and Innovation Center Publishing House
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://soc-journal.ru/jour/index.php/mssi/article/view/115 |
| _version_ | 1811189878783737856 |
|---|---|
| author | Liliya B. Varygina |
| author_facet | Liliya B. Varygina |
| author_sort | Liliya B. Varygina |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article presents a brief analysis of the ideas of the 20th century thinkers M. Foucault and J. Derrida in relation to the ideas of structuralism and poststructuralism, their similarity, difference and development of the discourse of structuralism as the main direction of socio-philosophical thought in Europe of the 20th century. Researchers identify several major milestones in connection with the development of structuralist thought, as well as the key authors of this direction of thought.
Purpose: to consider structuralism and poststructuralism from the standpoint of the development of socio-philosophical discourse, as well as changing the concept of structure and the role of the subject and his place in the concept of structure.
Method and methodology of the work: historical, phenomenological and dialectical research methods were used.
Results: structuralism proclaims decentralization and deautonomization of both the structure itself and the subjects included in it, noting that the person of society is not a structure with a certain center, they are structures of structures. This is the main difference in the definition of the meaning of being of self-sustaining structures both in society and in the person himself between structuralist and poststructuralist discourse.
Field of application of the results: the results obtained can be used in the study of modern social and cultural processes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T14:42:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e78b81bbd4d743a7963912141a6f4f5b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2077-1770 2218-7405 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T14:42:15Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Science and Innovation Center Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem |
| spelling | doaj.art-e78b81bbd4d743a7963912141a6f4f5b2022-12-22T04:17:51ZengScience and Innovation Center Publishing HouseSovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem2077-17702218-74052022-01-0113423624610.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-4-236-246115DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS OF STRUCTURALISM AND POSTSTRUCTURALISM IN SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE XX CENTURYLiliya B. Varygina0Surgut State UniversityThe article presents a brief analysis of the ideas of the 20th century thinkers M. Foucault and J. Derrida in relation to the ideas of structuralism and poststructuralism, their similarity, difference and development of the discourse of structuralism as the main direction of socio-philosophical thought in Europe of the 20th century. Researchers identify several major milestones in connection with the development of structuralist thought, as well as the key authors of this direction of thought. Purpose: to consider structuralism and poststructuralism from the standpoint of the development of socio-philosophical discourse, as well as changing the concept of structure and the role of the subject and his place in the concept of structure. Method and methodology of the work: historical, phenomenological and dialectical research methods were used. Results: structuralism proclaims decentralization and deautonomization of both the structure itself and the subjects included in it, noting that the person of society is not a structure with a certain center, they are structures of structures. This is the main difference in the definition of the meaning of being of self-sustaining structures both in society and in the person himself between structuralist and poststructuralist discourse. Field of application of the results: the results obtained can be used in the study of modern social and cultural processes.http://soc-journal.ru/jour/index.php/mssi/article/view/115structuralismpoststructuralismdiscoursestructuresubjectsignifiersignified |
| spellingShingle | Liliya B. Varygina DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS OF STRUCTURALISM AND POSTSTRUCTURALISM IN SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE XX CENTURY Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem structuralism poststructuralism discourse structure subject signifier signified |
| title | DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS OF STRUCTURALISM AND POSTSTRUCTURALISM IN SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE XX CENTURY |
| title_full | DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS OF STRUCTURALISM AND POSTSTRUCTURALISM IN SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE XX CENTURY |
| title_fullStr | DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS OF STRUCTURALISM AND POSTSTRUCTURALISM IN SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE XX CENTURY |
| title_full_unstemmed | DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS OF STRUCTURALISM AND POSTSTRUCTURALISM IN SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE XX CENTURY |
| title_short | DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS OF STRUCTURALISM AND POSTSTRUCTURALISM IN SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE XX CENTURY |
| title_sort | development of ideas of structuralism and poststructuralism in social philosophy of the xx century |
| topic | structuralism poststructuralism discourse structure subject signifier signified |
| url | http://soc-journal.ru/jour/index.php/mssi/article/view/115 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT liliyabvarygina developmentofideasofstructuralismandpoststructuralisminsocialphilosophyofthexxcentury |