Sizing Batteries for Power Flow Management in Distribution Grids: A Method to Compare Battery Capacities for Different Siting Configurations and Variable Power Flow Simultaneity

Battery energy storage (BES) can provide many grid services, such as power flow management to reduce distribution grid overloading. It is desirable to minimise BES storage capacities to reduce investment costs. However, it is not always clear how battery sizing is affected by battery siting and powe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian van Someren, Martien Visser, Han Slootweg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7639
_version_ 1797459436319539200
author Christian van Someren
Martien Visser
Han Slootweg
author_facet Christian van Someren
Martien Visser
Han Slootweg
author_sort Christian van Someren
collection DOAJ
description Battery energy storage (BES) can provide many grid services, such as power flow management to reduce distribution grid overloading. It is desirable to minimise BES storage capacities to reduce investment costs. However, it is not always clear how battery sizing is affected by battery siting and power flow simultaneity (PFS). This paper describes a method to compare the battery capacity required to provide grid services for different battery siting configurations and variable PFSs. The method was implemented by modelling a standard test grid with artificial power flow patterns and different battery siting configurations. The storage capacity of each configuration was minimised to determine how these variables affect the minimum storage capacity required to maintain power flows below a given threshold. In this case, a battery located at the transformer required 10–20% more capacity than a battery located centrally on the grid, or several batteries distributed throughout the grid, depending on PFS. The differences in capacity requirements were largely attributed to the ability of a BES configuration to mitigate network losses. The method presented in this paper can be used to compare BES capacity requirements for different battery siting configurations, power flow patterns, grid services, and grid characteristics.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:52:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e78f575f505d4784b1022968151263e4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:52:18Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-e78f575f505d4784b1022968151263e42023-11-24T14:40:37ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-11-011622763910.3390/en16227639Sizing Batteries for Power Flow Management in Distribution Grids: A Method to Compare Battery Capacities for Different Siting Configurations and Variable Power Flow SimultaneityChristian van Someren0Martien Visser1Han Slootweg2Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsEnTranCe: Centre of Expertise Energy, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Zernikeplein 17, 9747 AA Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsBattery energy storage (BES) can provide many grid services, such as power flow management to reduce distribution grid overloading. It is desirable to minimise BES storage capacities to reduce investment costs. However, it is not always clear how battery sizing is affected by battery siting and power flow simultaneity (PFS). This paper describes a method to compare the battery capacity required to provide grid services for different battery siting configurations and variable PFSs. The method was implemented by modelling a standard test grid with artificial power flow patterns and different battery siting configurations. The storage capacity of each configuration was minimised to determine how these variables affect the minimum storage capacity required to maintain power flows below a given threshold. In this case, a battery located at the transformer required 10–20% more capacity than a battery located centrally on the grid, or several batteries distributed throughout the grid, depending on PFS. The differences in capacity requirements were largely attributed to the ability of a BES configuration to mitigate network losses. The method presented in this paper can be used to compare BES capacity requirements for different battery siting configurations, power flow patterns, grid services, and grid characteristics.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7639battery energy storagebattery sitingbattery sizingdistribution gridsmodellingpower flow management
spellingShingle Christian van Someren
Martien Visser
Han Slootweg
Sizing Batteries for Power Flow Management in Distribution Grids: A Method to Compare Battery Capacities for Different Siting Configurations and Variable Power Flow Simultaneity
Energies
battery energy storage
battery siting
battery sizing
distribution grids
modelling
power flow management
title Sizing Batteries for Power Flow Management in Distribution Grids: A Method to Compare Battery Capacities for Different Siting Configurations and Variable Power Flow Simultaneity
title_full Sizing Batteries for Power Flow Management in Distribution Grids: A Method to Compare Battery Capacities for Different Siting Configurations and Variable Power Flow Simultaneity
title_fullStr Sizing Batteries for Power Flow Management in Distribution Grids: A Method to Compare Battery Capacities for Different Siting Configurations and Variable Power Flow Simultaneity
title_full_unstemmed Sizing Batteries for Power Flow Management in Distribution Grids: A Method to Compare Battery Capacities for Different Siting Configurations and Variable Power Flow Simultaneity
title_short Sizing Batteries for Power Flow Management in Distribution Grids: A Method to Compare Battery Capacities for Different Siting Configurations and Variable Power Flow Simultaneity
title_sort sizing batteries for power flow management in distribution grids a method to compare battery capacities for different siting configurations and variable power flow simultaneity
topic battery energy storage
battery siting
battery sizing
distribution grids
modelling
power flow management
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7639
work_keys_str_mv AT christianvansomeren sizingbatteriesforpowerflowmanagementindistributiongridsamethodtocomparebatterycapacitiesfordifferentsitingconfigurationsandvariablepowerflowsimultaneity
AT martienvisser sizingbatteriesforpowerflowmanagementindistributiongridsamethodtocomparebatterycapacitiesfordifferentsitingconfigurationsandvariablepowerflowsimultaneity
AT hanslootweg sizingbatteriesforpowerflowmanagementindistributiongridsamethodtocomparebatterycapacitiesfordifferentsitingconfigurationsandvariablepowerflowsimultaneity