Differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feeds

The nutritive value of red deer feeds is frequently determined by sheep despite the ultimate arbitrator of the nutritive value of any feed is the host animal. The objective of the trial was to determine the influence of rumen fluid donor (sheep vs red deer) on in vitro dry matter (DMD), neutral-dete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrej LAVRENČIČ, Darko VETERNIK
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) 2018-06-01
Series:Acta Agriculturae Slovenica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uni-lj.si/aas/article/view/12816
_version_ 1797700764977594368
author Andrej LAVRENČIČ
Darko VETERNIK
author_facet Andrej LAVRENČIČ
Darko VETERNIK
author_sort Andrej LAVRENČIČ
collection DOAJ
description The nutritive value of red deer feeds is frequently determined by sheep despite the ultimate arbitrator of the nutritive value of any feed is the host animal. The objective of the trial was to determine the influence of rumen fluid donor (sheep vs red deer) on in vitro dry matter (DMD), neutral-detergent fibre (NDFD) and true digestibility (ivTD) of eleven substrata, naturally occurring in Slovenian forests (chestnut fruits, acorns of common and sessile oak, two fresh grasses) and those frequently used in supplemental red deer feeding (two grass hays and two grass silages, apple pomace and sugar beet roots). Only the fresh grass from Jelendol had greater (p < 0.05) DMD (646 vs 508 g/kg) when incubated in red deer inoculum. The NDFD and ivTD were always numerically greater when substrates were incubated in red deer inocula, however the NDFD and ivTD were significantly greater (p < 0.05) only when fresh grass from Jelendol (590 vs 343 g/kg and 801 vs 681 g/kg, respectively), grass silage from Kokra (541 vs 359 g/kg and 742 vs 639 g/kg, respectively) and apple pomace (428 vs 328 g/kg and 704 vs 653 g/kg, respectively) were incubated in the inoculum prepared from red deer rumen contents. These results indicate that rumen fluid from sheep can be used to predict in vitro digestibility in red deer and that these parameters can be used in the formulation of deer diets.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T04:26:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e7affa6c7946450c98764874150f363a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1854-1941
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T04:26:22Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
record_format Article
series Acta Agriculturae Slovenica
spelling doaj.art-e7affa6c7946450c98764874150f363a2023-09-03T10:21:44ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Acta Agriculturae Slovenica1854-19412018-06-01112110.14720/aas.2018.112.1.119208Differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feedsAndrej LAVRENČIČ0Darko VETERNIK1University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Animal ScienceLPN Kozorog KamnikThe nutritive value of red deer feeds is frequently determined by sheep despite the ultimate arbitrator of the nutritive value of any feed is the host animal. The objective of the trial was to determine the influence of rumen fluid donor (sheep vs red deer) on in vitro dry matter (DMD), neutral-detergent fibre (NDFD) and true digestibility (ivTD) of eleven substrata, naturally occurring in Slovenian forests (chestnut fruits, acorns of common and sessile oak, two fresh grasses) and those frequently used in supplemental red deer feeding (two grass hays and two grass silages, apple pomace and sugar beet roots). Only the fresh grass from Jelendol had greater (p < 0.05) DMD (646 vs 508 g/kg) when incubated in red deer inoculum. The NDFD and ivTD were always numerically greater when substrates were incubated in red deer inocula, however the NDFD and ivTD were significantly greater (p < 0.05) only when fresh grass from Jelendol (590 vs 343 g/kg and 801 vs 681 g/kg, respectively), grass silage from Kokra (541 vs 359 g/kg and 742 vs 639 g/kg, respectively) and apple pomace (428 vs 328 g/kg and 704 vs 653 g/kg, respectively) were incubated in the inoculum prepared from red deer rumen contents. These results indicate that rumen fluid from sheep can be used to predict in vitro digestibility in red deer and that these parameters can be used in the formulation of deer diets.https://journals.uni-lj.si/aas/article/view/12816animal nutritionred deersheeprumenfeed evaluationin vitro digestibility
spellingShingle Andrej LAVRENČIČ
Darko VETERNIK
Differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feeds
Acta Agriculturae Slovenica
animal nutrition
red deer
sheep
rumen
feed evaluation
in vitro digestibility
title Differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feeds
title_full Differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feeds
title_fullStr Differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feeds
title_full_unstemmed Differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feeds
title_short Differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feeds
title_sort differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feeds
topic animal nutrition
red deer
sheep
rumen
feed evaluation
in vitro digestibility
url https://journals.uni-lj.si/aas/article/view/12816
work_keys_str_mv AT andrejlavrencic differencesbetweensheepandreddeerininvitroapparentandtruedigestibilityofcommonlyusedreddeerfeeds
AT darkoveternik differencesbetweensheepandreddeerininvitroapparentandtruedigestibilityofcommonlyusedreddeerfeeds