Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan Africa

Interest in the governance of big data is growing exponentially. However, finding the right balance between making large volumes of data accessible, and safeguarding privacy, preventing data misuse, determining authorship and protecting intellectual property remain challenging. In sub-Saharan Afric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nezerith Cengiz, Siti M. Kabanda, Tonya M. Esterhuizen, Keymanthri Moodley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2023-05-01
Series:South African Journal of Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajs.co.za/article/view/14905
_version_ 1827937279108186112
author Nezerith Cengiz
Siti M. Kabanda
Tonya M. Esterhuizen
Keymanthri Moodley
author_facet Nezerith Cengiz
Siti M. Kabanda
Tonya M. Esterhuizen
Keymanthri Moodley
author_sort Nezerith Cengiz
collection DOAJ
description Interest in the governance of big data is growing exponentially. However, finding the right balance between making large volumes of data accessible, and safeguarding privacy, preventing data misuse, determining authorship and protecting intellectual property remain challenging. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), research ethics committees (RECs) play an important role in reviewing data-intense research protocols. However, this regulatory role must be embedded in a context of robust governance. There is currently a paucity of published literature on how big data are regulated in SSA and if the capacity to review protocols is sufficient. The aim of this study was to provide a broad overview of REC members’ awareness and perceptions of big data governance in SSA. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted from April to July 2022. We invited 300 REC members to participate in our online survey via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). A total of 140 REC members, representing 34 SSA countries, completed the online survey. Awareness of data governance laws, policies and guidelines was variable across the subcontinent. A quarter of respondents (25%) indicated that national regulations on the transborder flow of research data are inadequate. Institutional policies on research data protection were also regarded as being inadequate. Most respondents (64%) believed that they lacked experience in reviewing data-intense protocols. Data governance and regulation in SSA need to be strengthened at both national and institutional levels. There is a strong need for capacity development in the review of data-intense research protocols on the subcontinent. Significance: This is the first empirical survey in SSA in which awareness and perspectives of REC members have been explored specifically relating to the review of data-intense research protocols. Big data have raised new ethics and legal challenges, and this survey provides a broad overview of these challenges in SSA. Our study confirms that knowledge and awareness of legislative frameworks and ethics guidance in SSA vary considerably where big data are concerned. The research results could be useful for a range of stakeholders, including RECs, data scientists, researchers, research and academic institutions, government decisionmakers and artificial intelligence (AI) coders.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T08:23:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e7b809aaeea34a5a9578909c73d4e92a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-7489
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T08:23:14Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
record_format Article
series South African Journal of Science
spelling doaj.art-e7b809aaeea34a5a9578909c73d4e92a2023-05-31T06:33:55ZengAcademy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science1996-74892023-05-011195/610.17159/sajs.2023/14905Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan AfricaNezerith Cengiz0Siti M. Kabanda1Tonya M. Esterhuizen2Keymanthri Moodley3Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South AfricaCentre for Medical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South AfricaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South AfricaCentre for Medical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa Interest in the governance of big data is growing exponentially. However, finding the right balance between making large volumes of data accessible, and safeguarding privacy, preventing data misuse, determining authorship and protecting intellectual property remain challenging. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), research ethics committees (RECs) play an important role in reviewing data-intense research protocols. However, this regulatory role must be embedded in a context of robust governance. There is currently a paucity of published literature on how big data are regulated in SSA and if the capacity to review protocols is sufficient. The aim of this study was to provide a broad overview of REC members’ awareness and perceptions of big data governance in SSA. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted from April to July 2022. We invited 300 REC members to participate in our online survey via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). A total of 140 REC members, representing 34 SSA countries, completed the online survey. Awareness of data governance laws, policies and guidelines was variable across the subcontinent. A quarter of respondents (25%) indicated that national regulations on the transborder flow of research data are inadequate. Institutional policies on research data protection were also regarded as being inadequate. Most respondents (64%) believed that they lacked experience in reviewing data-intense protocols. Data governance and regulation in SSA need to be strengthened at both national and institutional levels. There is a strong need for capacity development in the review of data-intense research protocols on the subcontinent. Significance: This is the first empirical survey in SSA in which awareness and perspectives of REC members have been explored specifically relating to the review of data-intense research protocols. Big data have raised new ethics and legal challenges, and this survey provides a broad overview of these challenges in SSA. Our study confirms that knowledge and awareness of legislative frameworks and ethics guidance in SSA vary considerably where big data are concerned. The research results could be useful for a range of stakeholders, including RECs, data scientists, researchers, research and academic institutions, government decisionmakers and artificial intelligence (AI) coders. https://sajs.co.za/article/view/14905big datadata governancedata regulationresearch ethics committeessub-Saharan Africa
spellingShingle Nezerith Cengiz
Siti M. Kabanda
Tonya M. Esterhuizen
Keymanthri Moodley
Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan Africa
South African Journal of Science
big data
data governance
data regulation
research ethics committees
sub-Saharan Africa
title Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan Africa
title_full Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan Africa
title_fullStr Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan Africa
title_full_unstemmed Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan Africa
title_short Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan Africa
title_sort exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub saharan africa
topic big data
data governance
data regulation
research ethics committees
sub-Saharan Africa
url https://sajs.co.za/article/view/14905
work_keys_str_mv AT nezerithcengiz exploringperspectivesofresearchethicscommitteemembersonthegovernanceofbigdatainsubsaharanafrica
AT sitimkabanda exploringperspectivesofresearchethicscommitteemembersonthegovernanceofbigdatainsubsaharanafrica
AT tonyamesterhuizen exploringperspectivesofresearchethicscommitteemembersonthegovernanceofbigdatainsubsaharanafrica
AT keymanthrimoodley exploringperspectivesofresearchethicscommitteemembersonthegovernanceofbigdatainsubsaharanafrica