Dose-volume-based evaluation of convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation of thoracic organs at risk

Background and purpose: The geometrical accuracy of auto-segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has been demonstrated. This study aimed to investigate the dose-volume impact of differences between automatic and manual OARs for locally advanced (LA) and peripherally located early-sta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noémie Johnston, Jeffrey De Rycke, Yolande Lievens, Marc van Eijkeren, Jan Aelterman, Eva Vandersmissen, Stephan Ponte, Barbara Vanderstraeten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-07-01
Series:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631622000677
_version_ 1811277042272960512
author Noémie Johnston
Jeffrey De Rycke
Yolande Lievens
Marc van Eijkeren
Jan Aelterman
Eva Vandersmissen
Stephan Ponte
Barbara Vanderstraeten
author_facet Noémie Johnston
Jeffrey De Rycke
Yolande Lievens
Marc van Eijkeren
Jan Aelterman
Eva Vandersmissen
Stephan Ponte
Barbara Vanderstraeten
author_sort Noémie Johnston
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose: The geometrical accuracy of auto-segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has been demonstrated. This study aimed to investigate the dose-volume impact of differences between automatic and manual OARs for locally advanced (LA) and peripherally located early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Material and methods: A single CNN was created for automatic delineation of the heart, lungs, main left and right bronchus, esophagus, spinal cord and trachea using 55/10/40 patients for training/validation/testing. Dice score coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) were used for geometrical analysis. A new treatment plan based on the auto-segmented OARs was created for each test patient using 3D for ES-NSCLC (SBRT, 3–8 fractions) and IMRT for LA-NSCLC (24–35 fractions). The correlation between geometrical metrics and dose-volume differences was investigated. Results: The average (±1 SD) DSC and HD95 were 0.82 ± 0.07 and 16.2 ± 22.4 mm, while the average dose-volume differences were 0.5 ± 1.5 Gy (ES) and 1.5 ± 2.8 Gy (LA). The geometrical metrics did not correlate with the observed dose-volume differences (average Pearson for DSC: −0.27 ± 0.18 (ES) and −0.09 ± 0.12 (LA); HD95: 0.1 ± 0.3 mm (ES) and 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (LA)). Conclusions: After post-processing, manual adjustments of automatic contours are only needed for clinically relevant OARs situated close to the tumor or within an entry or exit beam e.g., the heart and the esophagus for LA-NSCLC and the bronchi for ES-NSCLC. The lungs do not need to be checked further in detail.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T00:08:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e7bfeb5bed11459dba361fc568572472
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-6316
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T00:08:36Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-e7bfeb5bed11459dba361fc5685724722022-12-22T03:11:10ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162022-07-0123109117Dose-volume-based evaluation of convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation of thoracic organs at riskNoémie Johnston0Jeffrey De Rycke1Yolande Lievens2Marc van Eijkeren3Jan Aelterman4Eva Vandersmissen5Stephan Ponte6Barbara Vanderstraeten7Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Service de Radiothérapie, Liège, BelgiumGhent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Gent, BelgiumGhent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Gent, Belgium; Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Gent, BelgiumGhent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Gent, Belgium; Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Gent, BelgiumGhent University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography, Gent, Belgium; Ghent University, Department TELIN / IMEC, Image Processing Interpretation Group, Gent, BelgiumAgfa NV, Radiology Solutions R&D, Mortsel, BelgiumCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Service de Radiothérapie, Liège, BelgiumGhent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Gent, Belgium; Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Gent, Belgium; Corresponding author at: Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, RTP Ingang 98, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.Background and purpose: The geometrical accuracy of auto-segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has been demonstrated. This study aimed to investigate the dose-volume impact of differences between automatic and manual OARs for locally advanced (LA) and peripherally located early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Material and methods: A single CNN was created for automatic delineation of the heart, lungs, main left and right bronchus, esophagus, spinal cord and trachea using 55/10/40 patients for training/validation/testing. Dice score coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) were used for geometrical analysis. A new treatment plan based on the auto-segmented OARs was created for each test patient using 3D for ES-NSCLC (SBRT, 3–8 fractions) and IMRT for LA-NSCLC (24–35 fractions). The correlation between geometrical metrics and dose-volume differences was investigated. Results: The average (±1 SD) DSC and HD95 were 0.82 ± 0.07 and 16.2 ± 22.4 mm, while the average dose-volume differences were 0.5 ± 1.5 Gy (ES) and 1.5 ± 2.8 Gy (LA). The geometrical metrics did not correlate with the observed dose-volume differences (average Pearson for DSC: −0.27 ± 0.18 (ES) and −0.09 ± 0.12 (LA); HD95: 0.1 ± 0.3 mm (ES) and 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (LA)). Conclusions: After post-processing, manual adjustments of automatic contours are only needed for clinically relevant OARs situated close to the tumor or within an entry or exit beam e.g., the heart and the esophagus for LA-NSCLC and the bronchi for ES-NSCLC. The lungs do not need to be checked further in detail.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631622000677Lung cancerRadiotherapyTreatment planningDoseVolumeDice
spellingShingle Noémie Johnston
Jeffrey De Rycke
Yolande Lievens
Marc van Eijkeren
Jan Aelterman
Eva Vandersmissen
Stephan Ponte
Barbara Vanderstraeten
Dose-volume-based evaluation of convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation of thoracic organs at risk
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Lung cancer
Radiotherapy
Treatment planning
Dose
Volume
Dice
title Dose-volume-based evaluation of convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation of thoracic organs at risk
title_full Dose-volume-based evaluation of convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation of thoracic organs at risk
title_fullStr Dose-volume-based evaluation of convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation of thoracic organs at risk
title_full_unstemmed Dose-volume-based evaluation of convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation of thoracic organs at risk
title_short Dose-volume-based evaluation of convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation of thoracic organs at risk
title_sort dose volume based evaluation of convolutional neural network based auto segmentation of thoracic organs at risk
topic Lung cancer
Radiotherapy
Treatment planning
Dose
Volume
Dice
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631622000677
work_keys_str_mv AT noemiejohnston dosevolumebasedevaluationofconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedautosegmentationofthoracicorgansatrisk
AT jeffreyderycke dosevolumebasedevaluationofconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedautosegmentationofthoracicorgansatrisk
AT yolandelievens dosevolumebasedevaluationofconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedautosegmentationofthoracicorgansatrisk
AT marcvaneijkeren dosevolumebasedevaluationofconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedautosegmentationofthoracicorgansatrisk
AT janaelterman dosevolumebasedevaluationofconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedautosegmentationofthoracicorgansatrisk
AT evavandersmissen dosevolumebasedevaluationofconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedautosegmentationofthoracicorgansatrisk
AT stephanponte dosevolumebasedevaluationofconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedautosegmentationofthoracicorgansatrisk
AT barbaravanderstraeten dosevolumebasedevaluationofconvolutionalneuralnetworkbasedautosegmentationofthoracicorgansatrisk