Architecture and the Social Frameworks of Memory: A Postscript to Maurice Halbwachs’ “Collective Memory”

This paper offers a commentary on Maurice Halwachs’ writings on “collective memory” in the years between 1925-1945. Architectural and urban spaces figure prominently in work of the French sociologist since he maintains that memories survive in the longue durée only to the extent they are indexed in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Can Bilsel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design 2017-06-01
Series:Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iconarptest.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/133
_version_ 1828024728417206272
author Can Bilsel
author_facet Can Bilsel
author_sort Can Bilsel
collection DOAJ
description This paper offers a commentary on Maurice Halwachs’ writings on “collective memory” in the years between 1925-1945. Architectural and urban spaces figure prominently in work of the French sociologist since he maintains that memories survive in the longue durée only to the extent they are indexed into architectural places, and mapped into an urban and historical topography. This comes with a caveat: in his pioneering study of “collective memory,” La topographie légendaire des Évangiles en Terre Sainte: etude de mémoire collective, Halbwachs highlights the discrepancy between the archaeological record preserved in material culture—for example ancient ruins and monuments—and the living memory of a religious community. Likewise, in his study of working classes, Halbwachs’ neologism, “collective memory” is defined as a deliberately unstable, and socially constructed category.  The provisional and fluid definition that Halbwachs assigned to “collective memory” offers an insight into our present predicament. In the last decades, the ability of architecture, urban design, and architectural conservation in framing and preserving a stable and unified cultural heritage has been profoundly challenged. This paper makes the case for moving away from merely technical inquiries that understand architecture and places as “sites of memory” to a new direction that builds upon Halbwachs’ social frameworks of memory. It is thanks to Halbwach’s pioneering, if incomplete, work on “collective memory” that we may understand how the emerging and open-ended social formations transform architecture and urban spaces.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T12:48:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e7ca10e0bdf344039b6e4c1f655172b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2147-9380
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T12:48:56Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design
record_format Article
series Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning
spelling doaj.art-e7ca10e0bdf344039b6e4c1f655172b82023-02-15T16:13:55ZengKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and DesignIconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning2147-93802017-06-0151Architecture and the Social Frameworks of Memory: A Postscript to Maurice Halbwachs’ “Collective Memory”Can Bilsel0University of San Diego This paper offers a commentary on Maurice Halwachs’ writings on “collective memory” in the years between 1925-1945. Architectural and urban spaces figure prominently in work of the French sociologist since he maintains that memories survive in the longue durée only to the extent they are indexed into architectural places, and mapped into an urban and historical topography. This comes with a caveat: in his pioneering study of “collective memory,” La topographie légendaire des Évangiles en Terre Sainte: etude de mémoire collective, Halbwachs highlights the discrepancy between the archaeological record preserved in material culture—for example ancient ruins and monuments—and the living memory of a religious community. Likewise, in his study of working classes, Halbwachs’ neologism, “collective memory” is defined as a deliberately unstable, and socially constructed category.  The provisional and fluid definition that Halbwachs assigned to “collective memory” offers an insight into our present predicament. In the last decades, the ability of architecture, urban design, and architectural conservation in framing and preserving a stable and unified cultural heritage has been profoundly challenged. This paper makes the case for moving away from merely technical inquiries that understand architecture and places as “sites of memory” to a new direction that builds upon Halbwachs’ social frameworks of memory. It is thanks to Halbwach’s pioneering, if incomplete, work on “collective memory” that we may understand how the emerging and open-ended social formations transform architecture and urban spaces. https://iconarptest.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/133HalbwachsMaurice (1877-1945)Collective MemorySocial Frameworks of MemorySites of MemoryArchitecture
spellingShingle Can Bilsel
Architecture and the Social Frameworks of Memory: A Postscript to Maurice Halbwachs’ “Collective Memory”
Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Halbwachs
Maurice (1877-1945)
Collective Memory
Social Frameworks of Memory
Sites of Memory
Architecture
title Architecture and the Social Frameworks of Memory: A Postscript to Maurice Halbwachs’ “Collective Memory”
title_full Architecture and the Social Frameworks of Memory: A Postscript to Maurice Halbwachs’ “Collective Memory”
title_fullStr Architecture and the Social Frameworks of Memory: A Postscript to Maurice Halbwachs’ “Collective Memory”
title_full_unstemmed Architecture and the Social Frameworks of Memory: A Postscript to Maurice Halbwachs’ “Collective Memory”
title_short Architecture and the Social Frameworks of Memory: A Postscript to Maurice Halbwachs’ “Collective Memory”
title_sort architecture and the social frameworks of memory a postscript to maurice halbwachs collective memory
topic Halbwachs
Maurice (1877-1945)
Collective Memory
Social Frameworks of Memory
Sites of Memory
Architecture
url https://iconarptest.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/133
work_keys_str_mv AT canbilsel architectureandthesocialframeworksofmemoryapostscripttomauricehalbwachscollectivememory