ClueNet: Clustering a temporal network based on topological similarity rather than denseness.

Network clustering is a very popular topic in the network science field. Its goal is to divide (partition) the network into groups (clusters or communities) of "topologically related" nodes, where the resulting topology-based clusters are expected to "correlate" well with node la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph Crawford, Tijana Milenković
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5940177?pdf=render
_version_ 1819163234308980736
author Joseph Crawford
Tijana Milenković
author_facet Joseph Crawford
Tijana Milenković
author_sort Joseph Crawford
collection DOAJ
description Network clustering is a very popular topic in the network science field. Its goal is to divide (partition) the network into groups (clusters or communities) of "topologically related" nodes, where the resulting topology-based clusters are expected to "correlate" well with node label information, i.e., metadata, such as cellular functions of genes/proteins in biological networks, or age or gender of people in social networks. Even for static data, the problem of network clustering is complex. For dynamic data, the problem is even more complex, due to an additional dimension of the data-their temporal (evolving) nature. Since the problem is computationally intractable, heuristic approaches need to be sought. Existing approaches for dynamic network clustering (DNC) have drawbacks. First, they assume that nodes should be in the same cluster if they are densely interconnected within the network. We hypothesize that in some applications, it might be of interest to cluster nodes that are topologically similar to each other instead of or in addition to requiring the nodes to be densely interconnected. Second, they ignore temporal information in their early steps, and when they do consider this information later on, they do so implicitly. We hypothesize that capturing temporal information earlier in the clustering process and doing so explicitly will improve results. We test these two hypotheses via our new approach called ClueNet. We evaluate ClueNet against six existing DNC methods on both social networks capturing evolving interactions between individuals (such as interactions between students in a high school) and biological networks capturing interactions between biomolecules in the cell at different ages. We find that ClueNet is superior in over 83% of all evaluation tests. As more real-world dynamic data are becoming available, DNC and thus ClueNet will only continue to gain importance.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T17:40:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e7fbc41edc534512bc3ba4e47aec3fb4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T17:40:53Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-e7fbc41edc534512bc3ba4e47aec3fb42022-12-21T18:18:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01135e019599310.1371/journal.pone.0195993ClueNet: Clustering a temporal network based on topological similarity rather than denseness.Joseph CrawfordTijana MilenkovićNetwork clustering is a very popular topic in the network science field. Its goal is to divide (partition) the network into groups (clusters or communities) of "topologically related" nodes, where the resulting topology-based clusters are expected to "correlate" well with node label information, i.e., metadata, such as cellular functions of genes/proteins in biological networks, or age or gender of people in social networks. Even for static data, the problem of network clustering is complex. For dynamic data, the problem is even more complex, due to an additional dimension of the data-their temporal (evolving) nature. Since the problem is computationally intractable, heuristic approaches need to be sought. Existing approaches for dynamic network clustering (DNC) have drawbacks. First, they assume that nodes should be in the same cluster if they are densely interconnected within the network. We hypothesize that in some applications, it might be of interest to cluster nodes that are topologically similar to each other instead of or in addition to requiring the nodes to be densely interconnected. Second, they ignore temporal information in their early steps, and when they do consider this information later on, they do so implicitly. We hypothesize that capturing temporal information earlier in the clustering process and doing so explicitly will improve results. We test these two hypotheses via our new approach called ClueNet. We evaluate ClueNet against six existing DNC methods on both social networks capturing evolving interactions between individuals (such as interactions between students in a high school) and biological networks capturing interactions between biomolecules in the cell at different ages. We find that ClueNet is superior in over 83% of all evaluation tests. As more real-world dynamic data are becoming available, DNC and thus ClueNet will only continue to gain importance.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5940177?pdf=render
spellingShingle Joseph Crawford
Tijana Milenković
ClueNet: Clustering a temporal network based on topological similarity rather than denseness.
PLoS ONE
title ClueNet: Clustering a temporal network based on topological similarity rather than denseness.
title_full ClueNet: Clustering a temporal network based on topological similarity rather than denseness.
title_fullStr ClueNet: Clustering a temporal network based on topological similarity rather than denseness.
title_full_unstemmed ClueNet: Clustering a temporal network based on topological similarity rather than denseness.
title_short ClueNet: Clustering a temporal network based on topological similarity rather than denseness.
title_sort cluenet clustering a temporal network based on topological similarity rather than denseness
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5940177?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT josephcrawford cluenetclusteringatemporalnetworkbasedontopologicalsimilarityratherthandenseness
AT tijanamilenkovic cluenetclusteringatemporalnetworkbasedontopologicalsimilarityratherthandenseness