Rupture and Response—Rorty, Cavell, and Rancière on the Role of the Poetic Powers of Democratic Citizens in Overcoming Injustices and Oppression

In this paper, I discuss the importance of practices of disidentification and imagination for democratic progress and change. To this end, I bring together certain aspects of Stanley Cavell’s and Richard Rorty’s reflections on democracy, aesthetics, and morality with Jacques Rancière’s account of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Räber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Philosophies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/8/4/62
_version_ 1827294669277495296
author Michael Räber
author_facet Michael Räber
author_sort Michael Räber
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, I discuss the importance of practices of disidentification and imagination for democratic progress and change. To this end, I bring together certain aspects of Stanley Cavell’s and Richard Rorty’s reflections on democracy, aesthetics, and morality with Jacques Rancière’s account of the importance of appearance for democratic participation. With Rancière, it can be shown that any public–political order always involves the possibility (and often the reality) of exclusion or oppression of those who “have no part” in the current order through a particular order of perceptibility, and that democratic action, therefore, requires rupturing acts of political agency on the part of self-proclaimed political actors through which disidentifications and constructions of difference against such existing orders become possible. With Cavell and Rorty, in turn, it can be shown that these rupturing moments, in order to actually become politically effective, require a responsive disposition and a willingness to engage in practices of imagination on the part of those who occupy dominant positions on existing orders, insofar as they must acknowledge the expression of others’ sense of injustice. The upshot of my discussion is that a comprehensive account of the aesthetic dimension of democratic politics must simultaneously address the interruption of political action on the one hand and responsiveness on the other, and that Rancière and the neo-pragmatists Rorty and Cavell complement each other insofar as they illuminate the blind spots of their respective approaches.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:39:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e7fd94058550451a8f6dbf7a17e54ab4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2409-9287
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T14:07:04Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Philosophies
spelling doaj.art-e7fd94058550451a8f6dbf7a17e54ab42024-04-03T10:23:09ZengMDPI AGPhilosophies2409-92872023-07-01846210.3390/philosophies8040062Rupture and Response—Rorty, Cavell, and Rancière on the Role of the Poetic Powers of Democratic Citizens in Overcoming Injustices and OppressionMichael Räber0Department of Philosophy, University of Lucerne, 6002 Lucerne, SwitzerlandIn this paper, I discuss the importance of practices of disidentification and imagination for democratic progress and change. To this end, I bring together certain aspects of Stanley Cavell’s and Richard Rorty’s reflections on democracy, aesthetics, and morality with Jacques Rancière’s account of the importance of appearance for democratic participation. With Rancière, it can be shown that any public–political order always involves the possibility (and often the reality) of exclusion or oppression of those who “have no part” in the current order through a particular order of perceptibility, and that democratic action, therefore, requires rupturing acts of political agency on the part of self-proclaimed political actors through which disidentifications and constructions of difference against such existing orders become possible. With Cavell and Rorty, in turn, it can be shown that these rupturing moments, in order to actually become politically effective, require a responsive disposition and a willingness to engage in practices of imagination on the part of those who occupy dominant positions on existing orders, insofar as they must acknowledge the expression of others’ sense of injustice. The upshot of my discussion is that a comprehensive account of the aesthetic dimension of democratic politics must simultaneously address the interruption of political action on the one hand and responsiveness on the other, and that Rancière and the neo-pragmatists Rorty and Cavell complement each other insofar as they illuminate the blind spots of their respective approaches.https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/8/4/62radical democracyaestheticscultural politicspragmatismRortyCavell
spellingShingle Michael Räber
Rupture and Response—Rorty, Cavell, and Rancière on the Role of the Poetic Powers of Democratic Citizens in Overcoming Injustices and Oppression
Philosophies
radical democracy
aesthetics
cultural politics
pragmatism
Rorty
Cavell
title Rupture and Response—Rorty, Cavell, and Rancière on the Role of the Poetic Powers of Democratic Citizens in Overcoming Injustices and Oppression
title_full Rupture and Response—Rorty, Cavell, and Rancière on the Role of the Poetic Powers of Democratic Citizens in Overcoming Injustices and Oppression
title_fullStr Rupture and Response—Rorty, Cavell, and Rancière on the Role of the Poetic Powers of Democratic Citizens in Overcoming Injustices and Oppression
title_full_unstemmed Rupture and Response—Rorty, Cavell, and Rancière on the Role of the Poetic Powers of Democratic Citizens in Overcoming Injustices and Oppression
title_short Rupture and Response—Rorty, Cavell, and Rancière on the Role of the Poetic Powers of Democratic Citizens in Overcoming Injustices and Oppression
title_sort rupture and response rorty cavell and ranciere on the role of the poetic powers of democratic citizens in overcoming injustices and oppression
topic radical democracy
aesthetics
cultural politics
pragmatism
Rorty
Cavell
url https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/8/4/62
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelraber ruptureandresponserortycavellandranciereontheroleofthepoeticpowersofdemocraticcitizensinovercominginjusticesandoppression