DECOM JOB: NOTES ON THE DECOMMUNIZATION OF CITY SPACES

Following Maidan-2014 and subsequent political changes, the processes of de-communization in Ukraine have considerably accelerated and received the new impetus. The Parliament adopted a number of laws and legal acts concerning toponyms, monuments, and memorials, communist symbols, etc. that were to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Svitlana Shlipchenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of History of Ukraine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2017-10-01
Series:Місто: історія, культура, суспільство
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mics.org.ua/journal/index.php/mics/article/view/30
_version_ 1797635543610163200
author Svitlana Shlipchenko
author_facet Svitlana Shlipchenko
author_sort Svitlana Shlipchenko
collection DOAJ
description Following Maidan-2014 and subsequent political changes, the processes of de-communization in Ukraine have considerably accelerated and received the new impetus. The Parliament adopted a number of laws and legal acts concerning toponyms, monuments, and memorials, communist symbols, etc. that were to be removed from public spaces. The new legislation applied equally to open public spaces of the cities and villages (streets, squares, piazzas, public parks) and to the spaces of public use (municipal and government buildings, museums, underground stations, universities, schools, etc.). Leaving certain lacunas (e.g. using communist symbols in mass consumerist culture) and not specifying the ways and means the laws were to be implemented, the parliamentary acts gave way to numerous conflicts and misunderstandings, when the incessant confrontations with a painful past shape political attitudes. Furthermore, these processes call for re-conceptualizing the ways the past is set into the work of memory and represented in the city spaces. In the same breath, it resulted in mostly spontaneous, even hectic application of the provisions, and remains the contentious issue for the public, experts and local authorities alike. On the one hand, we see démontage, removal or dismantling/demolition of the objects that the experts tend to see as a part of the cultural or historical heritage, but which so far are not listed or assigned as such. While on the other hand, it works towards complete ignorance from the part of local authorities if not setting the conflicts between local communities. The paper will look at certain cases and practices of ‘de-communization’ in Ukrainian cities and analyze its pro-s and contra-s.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:22:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e8070d142561413d9848b1358aefad3d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2616-4280
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:22:16Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Institute of History of Ukraine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
record_format Article
series Місто: історія, культура, суспільство
spelling doaj.art-e8070d142561413d9848b1358aefad3d2023-11-06T21:48:53ZengInstitute of History of Ukraine, National Academy of Sciences of UkraineМісто: історія, культура, суспільство2616-42802017-10-01210.15407/mics2017.02.152DECOM JOB: NOTES ON THE DECOMMUNIZATION OF CITY SPACESSvitlana Shlipchenko0Center for Urban Studies, National University 'Kyiv-Mohula Academy' Following Maidan-2014 and subsequent political changes, the processes of de-communization in Ukraine have considerably accelerated and received the new impetus. The Parliament adopted a number of laws and legal acts concerning toponyms, monuments, and memorials, communist symbols, etc. that were to be removed from public spaces. The new legislation applied equally to open public spaces of the cities and villages (streets, squares, piazzas, public parks) and to the spaces of public use (municipal and government buildings, museums, underground stations, universities, schools, etc.). Leaving certain lacunas (e.g. using communist symbols in mass consumerist culture) and not specifying the ways and means the laws were to be implemented, the parliamentary acts gave way to numerous conflicts and misunderstandings, when the incessant confrontations with a painful past shape political attitudes. Furthermore, these processes call for re-conceptualizing the ways the past is set into the work of memory and represented in the city spaces. In the same breath, it resulted in mostly spontaneous, even hectic application of the provisions, and remains the contentious issue for the public, experts and local authorities alike. On the one hand, we see démontage, removal or dismantling/demolition of the objects that the experts tend to see as a part of the cultural or historical heritage, but which so far are not listed or assigned as such. While on the other hand, it works towards complete ignorance from the part of local authorities if not setting the conflicts between local communities. The paper will look at certain cases and practices of ‘de-communization’ in Ukrainian cities and analyze its pro-s and contra-s. http://mics.org.ua/journal/index.php/mics/article/view/30decommunizationdeconstructionmemory in urban spaceshistoric monument/heritagesymbolic landscape
spellingShingle Svitlana Shlipchenko
DECOM JOB: NOTES ON THE DECOMMUNIZATION OF CITY SPACES
Місто: історія, культура, суспільство
decommunization
deconstruction
memory in urban spaces
historic monument/heritage
symbolic landscape
title DECOM JOB: NOTES ON THE DECOMMUNIZATION OF CITY SPACES
title_full DECOM JOB: NOTES ON THE DECOMMUNIZATION OF CITY SPACES
title_fullStr DECOM JOB: NOTES ON THE DECOMMUNIZATION OF CITY SPACES
title_full_unstemmed DECOM JOB: NOTES ON THE DECOMMUNIZATION OF CITY SPACES
title_short DECOM JOB: NOTES ON THE DECOMMUNIZATION OF CITY SPACES
title_sort decom job notes on the decommunization of city spaces
topic decommunization
deconstruction
memory in urban spaces
historic monument/heritage
symbolic landscape
url http://mics.org.ua/journal/index.php/mics/article/view/30
work_keys_str_mv AT svitlanashlipchenko decomjobnotesonthedecommunizationofcityspaces