Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different Methods

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a common perinatal disease, is related to increased risks of maternal and neonatal adverse perinatal outcomes. We aimed to establish GDM risk prediction models that can be widely used in the first trimester using four different methods, including a score-scaled m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ning Wang, Haonan Guo, Yingyu Jing, Lin Song, Huan Chen, Mengjun Wang, Lei Gao, Lili Huang, Yanan Song, Bo Sun, Wei Cui, Jing Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Metabolites
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/12/11/1040
_version_ 1797467279784411136
author Ning Wang
Haonan Guo
Yingyu Jing
Lin Song
Huan Chen
Mengjun Wang
Lei Gao
Lili Huang
Yanan Song
Bo Sun
Wei Cui
Jing Xu
author_facet Ning Wang
Haonan Guo
Yingyu Jing
Lin Song
Huan Chen
Mengjun Wang
Lei Gao
Lili Huang
Yanan Song
Bo Sun
Wei Cui
Jing Xu
author_sort Ning Wang
collection DOAJ
description Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a common perinatal disease, is related to increased risks of maternal and neonatal adverse perinatal outcomes. We aimed to establish GDM risk prediction models that can be widely used in the first trimester using four different methods, including a score-scaled model derived from a meta-analysis using 42 studies, a logistic regression model, and two machine learning models (decision tree and random forest algorithms). The score-scaled model (seven variables) was established via a meta-analysis and a stratified cohort of 1075 Chinese pregnant women from the Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital (NWCH) and showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.772. The logistic regression model (seven variables) was established and validated using the above cohort and showed AUCs of 0.799 and 0.834 for the training and validation sets, respectively. Another two models were established using the decision tree (DT) and random forest (RF) algorithms and showed corresponding AUCs of 0.825 and 0.823 for the training set, and 0.816 and 0.827 for the validation set. The validation of the developed models suggested good performance in a cohort derived from another period. The score-scaled GDM prediction model, the logistic regression GDM prediction model, and the two machine learning GDM prediction models could be employed to identify pregnant women with a high risk of GDM using common clinical indicators, and interventions can be sought promptly.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:51:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e80860602fe84bde9479e05c0095df37
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2218-1989
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:51:22Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Metabolites
spelling doaj.art-e80860602fe84bde9479e05c0095df372023-11-24T05:50:03ZengMDPI AGMetabolites2218-19892022-10-011211104010.3390/metabo12111040Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different MethodsNing Wang0Haonan Guo1Yingyu Jing2Lin Song3Huan Chen4Mengjun Wang5Lei Gao6Lili Huang7Yanan Song8Bo Sun9Wei Cui10Jing Xu11Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology and Second Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology and Second Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, ChinaDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710061, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology and Second Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, ChinaDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710061, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, ChinaDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, ChinaDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710061, ChinaInternational Center for Obesity and Metabolic Disease Research of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, ChinaGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a common perinatal disease, is related to increased risks of maternal and neonatal adverse perinatal outcomes. We aimed to establish GDM risk prediction models that can be widely used in the first trimester using four different methods, including a score-scaled model derived from a meta-analysis using 42 studies, a logistic regression model, and two machine learning models (decision tree and random forest algorithms). The score-scaled model (seven variables) was established via a meta-analysis and a stratified cohort of 1075 Chinese pregnant women from the Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital (NWCH) and showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.772. The logistic regression model (seven variables) was established and validated using the above cohort and showed AUCs of 0.799 and 0.834 for the training and validation sets, respectively. Another two models were established using the decision tree (DT) and random forest (RF) algorithms and showed corresponding AUCs of 0.825 and 0.823 for the training set, and 0.816 and 0.827 for the validation set. The validation of the developed models suggested good performance in a cohort derived from another period. The score-scaled GDM prediction model, the logistic regression GDM prediction model, and the two machine learning GDM prediction models could be employed to identify pregnant women with a high risk of GDM using common clinical indicators, and interventions can be sought promptly.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/12/11/1040gestational diabetes mellitusprediction modelsrisk factorsearly pregnancy
spellingShingle Ning Wang
Haonan Guo
Yingyu Jing
Lin Song
Huan Chen
Mengjun Wang
Lei Gao
Lili Huang
Yanan Song
Bo Sun
Wei Cui
Jing Xu
Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different Methods
Metabolites
gestational diabetes mellitus
prediction models
risk factors
early pregnancy
title Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different Methods
title_full Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different Methods
title_fullStr Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different Methods
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different Methods
title_short Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different Methods
title_sort development and validation of risk prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus using four different methods
topic gestational diabetes mellitus
prediction models
risk factors
early pregnancy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/12/11/1040
work_keys_str_mv AT ningwang developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT haonanguo developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT yingyujing developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT linsong developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT huanchen developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT mengjunwang developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT leigao developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT lilihuang developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT yanansong developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT bosun developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT weicui developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods
AT jingxu developmentandvalidationofriskpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitususingfourdifferentmethods