A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia

Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump has proven to reduce the incidence of unscheduled clinician interventions and total dose of local anesthetic administered for labor pain. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the quality of analgesia, maternal satis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manish Banjare, Aditi Kaushal, Deepali Valecha, Nandini Bhatt, K. K. Arora
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara 2023-09-01
Series:Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/54656
_version_ 1797727886968356864
author Manish Banjare
Aditi Kaushal
Deepali Valecha
Nandini Bhatt
K. K. Arora
author_facet Manish Banjare
Aditi Kaushal
Deepali Valecha
Nandini Bhatt
K. K. Arora
author_sort Manish Banjare
collection DOAJ
description Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump has proven to reduce the incidence of unscheduled clinician interventions and total dose of local anesthetic administered for labor pain. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the quality of analgesia, maternal satisfaction, amount of rescue analgesia needed, and neonatal outcome between clinician delivered manual bolus doses and PCEA pumps for epidural labor analgesia. Materials and Methods: 60 parturients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists II scheduled for normal vaginal delivery were randomly divided into two groups, Group A (PCEA) and Group B (Manual bolus). Both groups received an initial epidural bolus of 10 mL of 0.125% Inj. Bupivacaine+20 mcg injection fentanyl. Group A (PCEA) patients received a basal infusion of 5 mL/h with self-administered bolus of 2 mL with a lockout interval of 15 min. Group B patients were provided with a bolus of 10 mL of the same solution manually after every hour. Patients of both groups were given manual rescue boluses for distressing pain (visual analog scale [VAS] >5). Results: Mean VAS score in Group A was 2.97±0.73; and in Group B, it was 3.03±0.56 (P>0.05). Total bupivacaine use and mean duration of second stage of labor in both groups was found comparable. Mean top-up requirement of local anesthetics was significantly high in Group B. Maternal satisfaction was also higher in PCEA group. Conclusion: As PCEA pump provides continuous infusion of local anesthetics, there was lesser requirement of top ups of bupivacaine and higher maternal satisfaction score in PCEA group than manual bolus group.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:05:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e817587411e74fedbed8860a38e58772
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2467-9100
2091-0576
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:05:59Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e817587411e74fedbed8860a38e587722023-09-02T03:53:50ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762023-09-011496468https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i9.54656A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesiaManish Banjare 0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7695-5645Aditi Kaushal 1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-4557Deepali Valecha 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-6720Nandini Bhatt 3https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3139-2192K. K. Arora 4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7376-4322Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump has proven to reduce the incidence of unscheduled clinician interventions and total dose of local anesthetic administered for labor pain. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the quality of analgesia, maternal satisfaction, amount of rescue analgesia needed, and neonatal outcome between clinician delivered manual bolus doses and PCEA pumps for epidural labor analgesia. Materials and Methods: 60 parturients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists II scheduled for normal vaginal delivery were randomly divided into two groups, Group A (PCEA) and Group B (Manual bolus). Both groups received an initial epidural bolus of 10 mL of 0.125% Inj. Bupivacaine+20 mcg injection fentanyl. Group A (PCEA) patients received a basal infusion of 5 mL/h with self-administered bolus of 2 mL with a lockout interval of 15 min. Group B patients were provided with a bolus of 10 mL of the same solution manually after every hour. Patients of both groups were given manual rescue boluses for distressing pain (visual analog scale [VAS] >5). Results: Mean VAS score in Group A was 2.97±0.73; and in Group B, it was 3.03±0.56 (P>0.05). Total bupivacaine use and mean duration of second stage of labor in both groups was found comparable. Mean top-up requirement of local anesthetics was significantly high in Group B. Maternal satisfaction was also higher in PCEA group. Conclusion: As PCEA pump provides continuous infusion of local anesthetics, there was lesser requirement of top ups of bupivacaine and higher maternal satisfaction score in PCEA group than manual bolus group.https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/54656labor analgesia; patient-controlled epidural analgesia; visual analog scale
spellingShingle Manish Banjare
Aditi Kaushal
Deepali Valecha
Nandini Bhatt
K. K. Arora
A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
labor analgesia; patient-controlled epidural analgesia; visual analog scale
title A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia
title_full A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia
title_fullStr A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia
title_full_unstemmed A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia
title_short A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia
title_sort randomized comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia
topic labor analgesia; patient-controlled epidural analgesia; visual analog scale
url https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/54656
work_keys_str_mv AT manishbanjare arandomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia
AT aditikaushal arandomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia
AT deepalivalecha arandomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia
AT nandinibhatt arandomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia
AT kkarora arandomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia
AT manishbanjare randomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia
AT aditikaushal randomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia
AT deepalivalecha randomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia
AT nandinibhatt randomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia
AT kkarora randomizedcomparativestudyofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiawithmanualstandardintermittentbolusforlaboranalgesia