Assessment for the Common Core Mathematics Standards

This article makes two simple observations about high-stakes assessments. The first is that, because mathematics is a very technical subject, an assessment item can be mathematically flawed regardless of how elementary it is. For this reason, every assessment project needs the active participation o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hung-Hsi Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2012-05-01
Series:Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College
Online Access:https://journals-test.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/729
_version_ 1818501378157314048
author Hung-Hsi Wu
author_facet Hung-Hsi Wu
author_sort Hung-Hsi Wu
collection DOAJ
description This article makes two simple observations about high-stakes assessments. The first is that, because mathematics is a very technical subject, an assessment item can be mathematically flawed regardless of how elementary it is. For this reason, every assessment project needs the active participation of high level mathematicians. A second point is that high-stakes assessments are inherently a very blunt instrument because they are incapable of accurately measuring the most important aspect of mathematics achievement: sustained sequential thinking. Because the general public and policy makers are not aware of this fact, they tend to read more into such assessment scores than such a limited instrument can deliver. If we want high-stakes assessments to have a positive influence on mathematics education, this article suggests that we should reorient our thinking about how much student achievement such assessments can reliably measure, which is “not very much.”
first_indexed 2024-12-10T20:55:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e81bab5713ab4abbbcaeb858f84e4ffe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2156-1400
2156-1397
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T20:55:18Z
publishDate 2012-05-01
publisher Columbia University Libraries
record_format Article
series Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College
spelling doaj.art-e81bab5713ab4abbbcaeb858f84e4ffe2022-12-22T01:33:59ZengColumbia University LibrariesJournal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College2156-14002156-13972012-05-0131Assessment for the Common Core Mathematics StandardsHung-Hsi Wu0University of California at BerkeleyThis article makes two simple observations about high-stakes assessments. The first is that, because mathematics is a very technical subject, an assessment item can be mathematically flawed regardless of how elementary it is. For this reason, every assessment project needs the active participation of high level mathematicians. A second point is that high-stakes assessments are inherently a very blunt instrument because they are incapable of accurately measuring the most important aspect of mathematics achievement: sustained sequential thinking. Because the general public and policy makers are not aware of this fact, they tend to read more into such assessment scores than such a limited instrument can deliver. If we want high-stakes assessments to have a positive influence on mathematics education, this article suggests that we should reorient our thinking about how much student achievement such assessments can reliably measure, which is “not very much.”https://journals-test.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/729
spellingShingle Hung-Hsi Wu
Assessment for the Common Core Mathematics Standards
Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College
title Assessment for the Common Core Mathematics Standards
title_full Assessment for the Common Core Mathematics Standards
title_fullStr Assessment for the Common Core Mathematics Standards
title_full_unstemmed Assessment for the Common Core Mathematics Standards
title_short Assessment for the Common Core Mathematics Standards
title_sort assessment for the common core mathematics standards
url https://journals-test.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/729
work_keys_str_mv AT hunghsiwu assessmentforthecommoncoremathematicsstandards