Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis

Knowledge about anatomical shape variations in the pelvis is mandatory for selection, fitting, positioning, and fixation in pelvic surgery. The current knowledge on pelvic shape variation mostly relies on point-to-point measurements on 2D X-ray images and computed tomography (CT) slices. Three-dimen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Willemina A. van Veldhuizen, Hylke van der Wel, Hennie Y. Kuipers, Joep Kraeima, Kaj ten Duis, Jelmer M. Wolterink, Jean-Paul P. M. de Vries, Richte C. L. Schuurmann, Frank F. A. IJpma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/11/3767
_version_ 1797597268502642688
author Willemina A. van Veldhuizen
Hylke van der Wel
Hennie Y. Kuipers
Joep Kraeima
Kaj ten Duis
Jelmer M. Wolterink
Jean-Paul P. M. de Vries
Richte C. L. Schuurmann
Frank F. A. IJpma
author_facet Willemina A. van Veldhuizen
Hylke van der Wel
Hennie Y. Kuipers
Joep Kraeima
Kaj ten Duis
Jelmer M. Wolterink
Jean-Paul P. M. de Vries
Richte C. L. Schuurmann
Frank F. A. IJpma
author_sort Willemina A. van Veldhuizen
collection DOAJ
description Knowledge about anatomical shape variations in the pelvis is mandatory for selection, fitting, positioning, and fixation in pelvic surgery. The current knowledge on pelvic shape variation mostly relies on point-to-point measurements on 2D X-ray images and computed tomography (CT) slices. Three-dimensional region-specific assessments of pelvic morphology are scarce. Our aim was to develop a statistical shape model of the hemipelvis to assess anatomical shape variations in the hemipelvis. CT scans of 200 patients (100 male and 100 female) were used to obtain segmentations. An iterative closest point algorithm was performed to register these 3D segmentations, so a principal component analysis (PCA) could be performed, and a statistical shape model (SSM) of the hemipelvis was developed. The first 15 principal components (PCs) described 90% of the total shape variation, and the reconstruction ability of this SSM resulted in a root mean square error of 1.58 (95% CI: 1.53–1.63) mm. In summary, an SSM of the hemipelvis was developed, which describes the shape variations in a Caucasian population and is able to reconstruct an aberrant hemipelvis. Principal component analyses demonstrated that, in a general population, anatomical shape variations were mostly related to differences in the size of the pelvis (e.g., PC1 describes 68% of the total shape variation, which is attributed to size). Differences between the male and female pelvis were most pronounced in the iliac wing and pubic rami regions. These regions are often subject to injuries. Future clinical applications of our newly developed SSM may be relevant for SSM-based semi-automatic virtual reconstruction of a fractured hemipelvis as part of preoperative planning. Lastly, for companies, using our SSM might be interesting in order to assess which sizes of pelvic implants should be produced to provide proper-fitting implants for most of the population.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:04:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e81d8540cf594813a3af476f83e3cf48
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:04:08Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-e81d8540cf594813a3af476f83e3cf482023-11-18T08:06:10ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-05-011211376710.3390/jcm12113767Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the HemipelvisWillemina A. van Veldhuizen0Hylke van der Wel1Hennie Y. Kuipers2Joep Kraeima3Kaj ten Duis4Jelmer M. Wolterink5Jean-Paul P. M. de Vries6Richte C. L. Schuurmann7Frank F. A. IJpma8Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/3D Lab, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/3D Lab, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Technical Medical Centre, 7500 AE Enschede, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsKnowledge about anatomical shape variations in the pelvis is mandatory for selection, fitting, positioning, and fixation in pelvic surgery. The current knowledge on pelvic shape variation mostly relies on point-to-point measurements on 2D X-ray images and computed tomography (CT) slices. Three-dimensional region-specific assessments of pelvic morphology are scarce. Our aim was to develop a statistical shape model of the hemipelvis to assess anatomical shape variations in the hemipelvis. CT scans of 200 patients (100 male and 100 female) were used to obtain segmentations. An iterative closest point algorithm was performed to register these 3D segmentations, so a principal component analysis (PCA) could be performed, and a statistical shape model (SSM) of the hemipelvis was developed. The first 15 principal components (PCs) described 90% of the total shape variation, and the reconstruction ability of this SSM resulted in a root mean square error of 1.58 (95% CI: 1.53–1.63) mm. In summary, an SSM of the hemipelvis was developed, which describes the shape variations in a Caucasian population and is able to reconstruct an aberrant hemipelvis. Principal component analyses demonstrated that, in a general population, anatomical shape variations were mostly related to differences in the size of the pelvis (e.g., PC1 describes 68% of the total shape variation, which is attributed to size). Differences between the male and female pelvis were most pronounced in the iliac wing and pubic rami regions. These regions are often subject to injuries. Future clinical applications of our newly developed SSM may be relevant for SSM-based semi-automatic virtual reconstruction of a fractured hemipelvis as part of preoperative planning. Lastly, for companies, using our SSM might be interesting in order to assess which sizes of pelvic implants should be produced to provide proper-fitting implants for most of the population.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/11/3767pelvispelvic fracturestatistical shape modelingprincipal component analysisosteosynthesis3D geometrical model
spellingShingle Willemina A. van Veldhuizen
Hylke van der Wel
Hennie Y. Kuipers
Joep Kraeima
Kaj ten Duis
Jelmer M. Wolterink
Jean-Paul P. M. de Vries
Richte C. L. Schuurmann
Frank F. A. IJpma
Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis
Journal of Clinical Medicine
pelvis
pelvic fracture
statistical shape modeling
principal component analysis
osteosynthesis
3D geometrical model
title Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis
title_full Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis
title_fullStr Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis
title_short Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis
title_sort development of a statistical shape model and assessment of anatomical shape variations in the hemipelvis
topic pelvis
pelvic fracture
statistical shape modeling
principal component analysis
osteosynthesis
3D geometrical model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/11/3767
work_keys_str_mv AT willeminaavanveldhuizen developmentofastatisticalshapemodelandassessmentofanatomicalshapevariationsinthehemipelvis
AT hylkevanderwel developmentofastatisticalshapemodelandassessmentofanatomicalshapevariationsinthehemipelvis
AT hennieykuipers developmentofastatisticalshapemodelandassessmentofanatomicalshapevariationsinthehemipelvis
AT joepkraeima developmentofastatisticalshapemodelandassessmentofanatomicalshapevariationsinthehemipelvis
AT kajtenduis developmentofastatisticalshapemodelandassessmentofanatomicalshapevariationsinthehemipelvis
AT jelmermwolterink developmentofastatisticalshapemodelandassessmentofanatomicalshapevariationsinthehemipelvis
AT jeanpaulpmdevries developmentofastatisticalshapemodelandassessmentofanatomicalshapevariationsinthehemipelvis
AT richteclschuurmann developmentofastatisticalshapemodelandassessmentofanatomicalshapevariationsinthehemipelvis
AT frankfaijpma developmentofastatisticalshapemodelandassessmentofanatomicalshapevariationsinthehemipelvis