To the question of ethno-cultural policy of contemporary states
At the end of 2010 - beginning of 2011 political leaders of Germany, Great Britain and France made statements for «a multiculturalism failure» that became a significant event in socio-political and ethnocultural life of Western Europe. Certainly, leaders of three leading countries of the European Un...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
State University of Management
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Управление |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/36 |
_version_ | 1826815883789467648 |
---|---|
author | E. S. Karsanova |
author_facet | E. S. Karsanova |
author_sort | E. S. Karsanova |
collection | DOAJ |
description | At the end of 2010 - beginning of 2011 political leaders of Germany, Great Britain and France made statements for «a multiculturalism failure» that became a significant event in socio-political and ethnocultural life of Western Europe. Certainly, leaders of three leading countries of the European Union didn’t put into question the need of harmonious coexistence of representatives of various ethnocultures and religions in one state. They focused attention of the world community on incorrectly chosen principle of the organization of interaction of various ethnoconfessional and cultural communities living in the territory of the national state. Today practically everywhere the structure of modern national states loses the uniformity, and explosive forces of multiculturalism generate very serious political and sociocultural problems. Due to that we encounter with the question whether it is possible or not to find an adequate background to reach a unification of the civil and ethnic nation? This article is an attempt to answer this question.The analysis of trends in modern ethno-cultural policy in some European countries allows us to consider the dynamics undergoing ethno-political and sociocultural processes, in some cases as a solution to actual economic tasks and labor migration, in others - as a search for optimum ways of artificial creation of unified multicultural space.The conducted research allows to conclude that the declaration of the principles of multiculturalism doesn’t give a guarantee of achievement of interethnic tolerance, on the contrary, its functional application in a form of a certain formal technique, is obviously unpromising right where the target state policy is realized |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T18:24:07Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e8251699adbe4188a768fbb2d54b25a6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2309-3633 2713-1645 |
language | Russian |
last_indexed | 2025-02-16T05:00:13Z |
publishDate | 2018-06-01 |
publisher | State University of Management |
record_format | Article |
series | Управление |
spelling | doaj.art-e8251699adbe4188a768fbb2d54b25a62025-02-04T09:04:37ZrusState University of ManagementУправление2309-36332713-16452018-06-0162677236To the question of ethno-cultural policy of contemporary statesE. S. Karsanova0State Univesity of ManagementAt the end of 2010 - beginning of 2011 political leaders of Germany, Great Britain and France made statements for «a multiculturalism failure» that became a significant event in socio-political and ethnocultural life of Western Europe. Certainly, leaders of three leading countries of the European Union didn’t put into question the need of harmonious coexistence of representatives of various ethnocultures and religions in one state. They focused attention of the world community on incorrectly chosen principle of the organization of interaction of various ethnoconfessional and cultural communities living in the territory of the national state. Today practically everywhere the structure of modern national states loses the uniformity, and explosive forces of multiculturalism generate very serious political and sociocultural problems. Due to that we encounter with the question whether it is possible or not to find an adequate background to reach a unification of the civil and ethnic nation? This article is an attempt to answer this question.The analysis of trends in modern ethno-cultural policy in some European countries allows us to consider the dynamics undergoing ethno-political and sociocultural processes, in some cases as a solution to actual economic tasks and labor migration, in others - as a search for optimum ways of artificial creation of unified multicultural space.The conducted research allows to conclude that the declaration of the principles of multiculturalism doesn’t give a guarantee of achievement of interethnic tolerance, on the contrary, its functional application in a form of a certain formal technique, is obviously unpromising right where the target state policy is realizedhttps://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/36multiculturalismethno-cultural pluralismethno-cultural policyethnic minorityinternational relationsall-civil identity |
spellingShingle | E. S. Karsanova To the question of ethno-cultural policy of contemporary states Управление multiculturalism ethno-cultural pluralism ethno-cultural policy ethnic minority international relations all-civil identity |
title | To the question of ethno-cultural policy of contemporary states |
title_full | To the question of ethno-cultural policy of contemporary states |
title_fullStr | To the question of ethno-cultural policy of contemporary states |
title_full_unstemmed | To the question of ethno-cultural policy of contemporary states |
title_short | To the question of ethno-cultural policy of contemporary states |
title_sort | to the question of ethno cultural policy of contemporary states |
topic | multiculturalism ethno-cultural pluralism ethno-cultural policy ethnic minority international relations all-civil identity |
url | https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/36 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eskarsanova tothequestionofethnoculturalpolicyofcontemporarystates |