Prognostic Impact of Pretherapeutic FDG-PET in Localized Anal Cancer

Due to the heterogeneity of tumour mass segmentation methods and lack of consensus, our study evaluated the prognostic value of pretherapeutic positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) metabolic parameters using different segmentation methods in patients with localized anal squa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maelle Le Thiec, Aude Testard, Ludovic Ferrer, Camille Guillerminet, Olivier Morel, Bruno Maucherat, Daniela Rusu, Sylvie Girault, Marie Lacombe, Hadji Hamidou, Véronique Guérin Meyer, Emmanuel Rio, Sandrine Hiret, Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré, Loïc Campion, Caroline Rousseau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/6/1512
_version_ 1797565750281502720
author Maelle Le Thiec
Aude Testard
Ludovic Ferrer
Camille Guillerminet
Olivier Morel
Bruno Maucherat
Daniela Rusu
Sylvie Girault
Marie Lacombe
Hadji Hamidou
Véronique Guérin Meyer
Emmanuel Rio
Sandrine Hiret
Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
Loïc Campion
Caroline Rousseau
author_facet Maelle Le Thiec
Aude Testard
Ludovic Ferrer
Camille Guillerminet
Olivier Morel
Bruno Maucherat
Daniela Rusu
Sylvie Girault
Marie Lacombe
Hadji Hamidou
Véronique Guérin Meyer
Emmanuel Rio
Sandrine Hiret
Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
Loïc Campion
Caroline Rousseau
author_sort Maelle Le Thiec
collection DOAJ
description Due to the heterogeneity of tumour mass segmentation methods and lack of consensus, our study evaluated the prognostic value of pretherapeutic positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) metabolic parameters using different segmentation methods in patients with localized anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Eighty-one patients with FDG-PET before radiochemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Semiquantitative data were measured with three fixed thresholds (35%, 41% and 50% of Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax)) and four segmentation methods based on iterative approaches (Black, Adaptive, Nestle and Fitting). Metabolic volumes of primary anal tumour (P-MTV) and total tumour load (T-MTV: P-MTV+ lymph node MTV) were calculated. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Seven multivariate models were created to compare FDG-PET tumour volumes prognostic impact. For all segmentation thresholds, PET metabolic volume parameters were independent prognostic factor and T-MTV variable was consistently better associated with EFS than P-MTV. Patient’s sex was an independent variable and significantly correlated with EFS. With fixed threshold segmentation methods, 35% of SUVmax threshold seemed better correlated with EFS and the best cut-off for discrimination between a low and high risk of event occurrence was 40 cm<sup>3</sup>. Determination of T-MTV by FDG-PET using fixed threshold segmentation is useful for predicting EFS for primary anal SCC. If these data are confirmed in larger studies, FDG-PET could contribute to individualized patient therapies.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:16:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e825956f2cd6438997af480e34ba9e16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:16:28Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-e825956f2cd6438997af480e34ba9e162023-11-20T03:21:19ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942020-06-01126151210.3390/cancers12061512Prognostic Impact of Pretherapeutic FDG-PET in Localized Anal CancerMaelle Le Thiec0Aude Testard1Ludovic Ferrer2Camille Guillerminet3Olivier Morel4Bruno Maucherat5Daniela Rusu6Sylvie Girault7Marie Lacombe8Hadji Hamidou9Véronique Guérin Meyer10Emmanuel Rio11Sandrine Hiret12Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré13Loïc Campion14Caroline Rousseau15Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, FranceNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, FranceMedical Physics Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, FranceMedical Physics Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, FranceNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, FranceNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, FranceNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, FranceNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, FranceNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, FranceRadiation Oncology Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, FranceMedical Oncology Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, FranceRadiation Oncology Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, FranceMedical Oncology Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, FranceNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, FranceCRCINA, University of Nantes and Angers, INSERM UMR1232, CNRS-ERL6001, 49055 Angers, FranceNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, FranceDue to the heterogeneity of tumour mass segmentation methods and lack of consensus, our study evaluated the prognostic value of pretherapeutic positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) metabolic parameters using different segmentation methods in patients with localized anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Eighty-one patients with FDG-PET before radiochemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Semiquantitative data were measured with three fixed thresholds (35%, 41% and 50% of Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax)) and four segmentation methods based on iterative approaches (Black, Adaptive, Nestle and Fitting). Metabolic volumes of primary anal tumour (P-MTV) and total tumour load (T-MTV: P-MTV+ lymph node MTV) were calculated. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Seven multivariate models were created to compare FDG-PET tumour volumes prognostic impact. For all segmentation thresholds, PET metabolic volume parameters were independent prognostic factor and T-MTV variable was consistently better associated with EFS than P-MTV. Patient’s sex was an independent variable and significantly correlated with EFS. With fixed threshold segmentation methods, 35% of SUVmax threshold seemed better correlated with EFS and the best cut-off for discrimination between a low and high risk of event occurrence was 40 cm<sup>3</sup>. Determination of T-MTV by FDG-PET using fixed threshold segmentation is useful for predicting EFS for primary anal SCC. If these data are confirmed in larger studies, FDG-PET could contribute to individualized patient therapies.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/6/1512anal cancerFDG-PETprognosismetabolic tumour volume
spellingShingle Maelle Le Thiec
Aude Testard
Ludovic Ferrer
Camille Guillerminet
Olivier Morel
Bruno Maucherat
Daniela Rusu
Sylvie Girault
Marie Lacombe
Hadji Hamidou
Véronique Guérin Meyer
Emmanuel Rio
Sandrine Hiret
Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
Loïc Campion
Caroline Rousseau
Prognostic Impact of Pretherapeutic FDG-PET in Localized Anal Cancer
Cancers
anal cancer
FDG-PET
prognosis
metabolic tumour volume
title Prognostic Impact of Pretherapeutic FDG-PET in Localized Anal Cancer
title_full Prognostic Impact of Pretherapeutic FDG-PET in Localized Anal Cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic Impact of Pretherapeutic FDG-PET in Localized Anal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Impact of Pretherapeutic FDG-PET in Localized Anal Cancer
title_short Prognostic Impact of Pretherapeutic FDG-PET in Localized Anal Cancer
title_sort prognostic impact of pretherapeutic fdg pet in localized anal cancer
topic anal cancer
FDG-PET
prognosis
metabolic tumour volume
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/6/1512
work_keys_str_mv AT maellelethiec prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT audetestard prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT ludovicferrer prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT camilleguillerminet prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT oliviermorel prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT brunomaucherat prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT danielarusu prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT sylviegirault prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT marielacombe prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT hadjihamidou prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT veroniqueguerinmeyer prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT emmanuelrio prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT sandrinehiret prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT francoisekraeberbodere prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT loiccampion prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer
AT carolinerousseau prognosticimpactofpretherapeuticfdgpetinlocalizedanalcancer