قول الصحابي عند الإمام الشافعي "دراسة تحليلية من كتابه "الأم

This article discusses an important jurisprudential issue related to one of the sources of reasoning by Imām Al-Shāfi’ī, especially in his book (Al-umm), which is the opinions of (Saḥābah) the Companion. This article collects all the clear texts that are directly related to the companion's o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hussain Ahmed Alawi Ba Omar
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: SZIC University of Peshawar 2020-06-01
Series:الإيضاح
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.al-idah.pk/index.php/al-idah/article/view/551
_version_ 1818738557770006528
author Hussain Ahmed Alawi Ba Omar
author_facet Hussain Ahmed Alawi Ba Omar
author_sort Hussain Ahmed Alawi Ba Omar
collection DOAJ
description This article discusses an important jurisprudential issue related to one of the sources of reasoning by Imām Al-Shāfi’ī, especially in his book (Al-umm), which is the opinions of (Saḥābah) the Companion. This article collects all the clear texts that are directly related to the companion's opinion in each book (Al-umm), and mentions the jurisprudential events that were mentioned because of them. It aims, therefore, to prove that Imām Al-Shāfi’ī considered the statement of the Companion to be one of the sources of legislation in Islamic jurisprudence, and that it comes after the Qur'ān and Sunnah and before Qiyās. This article also explains - inference from the texts of Al-Shāfi’ī - the different cases of the companions saying, such as the state of the companions ’consensus and their difference, and the criteria for weighting between the opinions of the companions of jurisprudence in the case of their difference. In the end, the article concludes that Al-Shāfi'ī considered the statement of the Companion as a legal evidence in itself, and that it is part of the Prophet’s Sunnah, and that the difference of the Companions does not preclude taking some of their sayings. This result is different with the well-known from Shāfi'ī's sayings in the books of Fundamentals of Jurisprudence that were written after him, even books written by jurists belonging to the Shāfi’ī school of thought. The article relies on the method of extrapolating all texts in the book (Al-umm) in order for the result to be an unquestionable affirmation, and for it to be a reference for all texts related to the subject in this book.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T01:10:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e82a03c137ba468797d291ee92590c00
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-0307
2664-3375
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-12-18T01:10:50Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher SZIC University of Peshawar
record_format Article
series الإيضاح
spelling doaj.art-e82a03c137ba468797d291ee92590c002022-12-21T21:26:06ZaraSZIC University of Peshawarالإيضاح2075-03072664-33752020-06-013817088https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.038.01.0551قول الصحابي عند الإمام الشافعي "دراسة تحليلية من كتابه "الأمHussain Ahmed Alawi Ba Omar 0Assistant professor Department of Social Sciences. Dhofar University. Salalah, OmanThis article discusses an important jurisprudential issue related to one of the sources of reasoning by Imām Al-Shāfi’ī, especially in his book (Al-umm), which is the opinions of (Saḥābah) the Companion. This article collects all the clear texts that are directly related to the companion's opinion in each book (Al-umm), and mentions the jurisprudential events that were mentioned because of them. It aims, therefore, to prove that Imām Al-Shāfi’ī considered the statement of the Companion to be one of the sources of legislation in Islamic jurisprudence, and that it comes after the Qur'ān and Sunnah and before Qiyās. This article also explains - inference from the texts of Al-Shāfi’ī - the different cases of the companions saying, such as the state of the companions ’consensus and their difference, and the criteria for weighting between the opinions of the companions of jurisprudence in the case of their difference. In the end, the article concludes that Al-Shāfi'ī considered the statement of the Companion as a legal evidence in itself, and that it is part of the Prophet’s Sunnah, and that the difference of the Companions does not preclude taking some of their sayings. This result is different with the well-known from Shāfi'ī's sayings in the books of Fundamentals of Jurisprudence that were written after him, even books written by jurists belonging to the Shāfi’ī school of thought. The article relies on the method of extrapolating all texts in the book (Al-umm) in order for the result to be an unquestionable affirmation, and for it to be a reference for all texts related to the subject in this book.http://www.al-idah.pk/index.php/al-idah/article/view/551opinioncompanional-umm
spellingShingle Hussain Ahmed Alawi Ba Omar
قول الصحابي عند الإمام الشافعي "دراسة تحليلية من كتابه "الأم
الإيضاح
opinion
companion
al-umm
title قول الصحابي عند الإمام الشافعي "دراسة تحليلية من كتابه "الأم
title_full قول الصحابي عند الإمام الشافعي "دراسة تحليلية من كتابه "الأم
title_fullStr قول الصحابي عند الإمام الشافعي "دراسة تحليلية من كتابه "الأم
title_full_unstemmed قول الصحابي عند الإمام الشافعي "دراسة تحليلية من كتابه "الأم
title_short قول الصحابي عند الإمام الشافعي "دراسة تحليلية من كتابه "الأم
title_sort قول الصحابي عند الإمام الشافعي دراسة تحليلية من كتابه الأم
topic opinion
companion
al-umm
url http://www.al-idah.pk/index.php/al-idah/article/view/551
work_keys_str_mv AT hussainahmedalawibaomar qwlạlṣḥạbyʿndạlạmạmạlsẖạfʿydrạsẗtḥlylyẗmnktạbhạlạm