A Two-Stage DSS to Evaluate Optimal Locations for Bioenergy Facilities

Research Highlights: A set of 128 potential bioenergy facility locations is established and evaluated based on the transport cost to select optimal locations. Background and Objectives: The identification of optimal facility locations to process recovered forest biomass is an important decision in d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sam Van Holsbeeck, Sättar Ezzati, Dominik Röser, Mark Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/9/968
_version_ 1797554522942341120
author Sam Van Holsbeeck
Sättar Ezzati
Dominik Röser
Mark Brown
author_facet Sam Van Holsbeeck
Sättar Ezzati
Dominik Röser
Mark Brown
author_sort Sam Van Holsbeeck
collection DOAJ
description Research Highlights: A set of 128 potential bioenergy facility locations is established and evaluated based on the transport cost to select optimal locations. Background and Objectives: The identification of optimal facility locations to process recovered forest biomass is an important decision in designing a bioenergy supply chain at the strategic planning level. The result of this analysis can affect supply chain costs and the overall efficiency of the network, due to the low density and dispersed nature of forest biomass and the high costs associated with its logistics operations. In this study, we develop a two-stage decision support system to identify the optimal site locations for forest biomass conversion based on biomass availability, transport distance and cost. Materials and Methods: In the first stage, a GIS-based analysis is designed to identify strategic locations of potential bioenergy sites. The second stage evaluates the most cost-effective locations individually using a transportation cost model, based on the results from stage one. The sensitivity of inputs, such as maximum allowable transport cost, the distance of transport and their relations to the profit balance, and changes in fuel price are tested. The method is applied to a real case study in the state of Queensland, Australia. Results and Conclusions: The GIS analysis resulted in 128 strategic candidate locations being suggested for bioenergy conversion sites. The logistics analysis estimated the optimal cost and transportation distance of each one of the locations and ranked them according to the overall performance between capacities of 5 and 100 MW.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:33:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e82f03a97ba14c84958022918607fa70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:33:22Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-e82f03a97ba14c84958022918607fa702023-11-20T12:41:35ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072020-09-0111996810.3390/f11090968A Two-Stage DSS to Evaluate Optimal Locations for Bioenergy FacilitiesSam Van Holsbeeck0Sättar Ezzati1Dominik Röser2Mark Brown3Forest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, AustraliaDépartement de Génie Mécanique, Université Laval, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaDepartment of Forest Resources Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, MainMall 2424, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, CanadaForest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, AustraliaResearch Highlights: A set of 128 potential bioenergy facility locations is established and evaluated based on the transport cost to select optimal locations. Background and Objectives: The identification of optimal facility locations to process recovered forest biomass is an important decision in designing a bioenergy supply chain at the strategic planning level. The result of this analysis can affect supply chain costs and the overall efficiency of the network, due to the low density and dispersed nature of forest biomass and the high costs associated with its logistics operations. In this study, we develop a two-stage decision support system to identify the optimal site locations for forest biomass conversion based on biomass availability, transport distance and cost. Materials and Methods: In the first stage, a GIS-based analysis is designed to identify strategic locations of potential bioenergy sites. The second stage evaluates the most cost-effective locations individually using a transportation cost model, based on the results from stage one. The sensitivity of inputs, such as maximum allowable transport cost, the distance of transport and their relations to the profit balance, and changes in fuel price are tested. The method is applied to a real case study in the state of Queensland, Australia. Results and Conclusions: The GIS analysis resulted in 128 strategic candidate locations being suggested for bioenergy conversion sites. The logistics analysis estimated the optimal cost and transportation distance of each one of the locations and ranked them according to the overall performance between capacities of 5 and 100 MW.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/9/968forest biomassbioenergylogistics costoptimal facility locationbiomass utilization
spellingShingle Sam Van Holsbeeck
Sättar Ezzati
Dominik Röser
Mark Brown
A Two-Stage DSS to Evaluate Optimal Locations for Bioenergy Facilities
Forests
forest biomass
bioenergy
logistics cost
optimal facility location
biomass utilization
title A Two-Stage DSS to Evaluate Optimal Locations for Bioenergy Facilities
title_full A Two-Stage DSS to Evaluate Optimal Locations for Bioenergy Facilities
title_fullStr A Two-Stage DSS to Evaluate Optimal Locations for Bioenergy Facilities
title_full_unstemmed A Two-Stage DSS to Evaluate Optimal Locations for Bioenergy Facilities
title_short A Two-Stage DSS to Evaluate Optimal Locations for Bioenergy Facilities
title_sort two stage dss to evaluate optimal locations for bioenergy facilities
topic forest biomass
bioenergy
logistics cost
optimal facility location
biomass utilization
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/9/968
work_keys_str_mv AT samvanholsbeeck atwostagedsstoevaluateoptimallocationsforbioenergyfacilities
AT sattarezzati atwostagedsstoevaluateoptimallocationsforbioenergyfacilities
AT dominikroser atwostagedsstoevaluateoptimallocationsforbioenergyfacilities
AT markbrown atwostagedsstoevaluateoptimallocationsforbioenergyfacilities
AT samvanholsbeeck twostagedsstoevaluateoptimallocationsforbioenergyfacilities
AT sattarezzati twostagedsstoevaluateoptimallocationsforbioenergyfacilities
AT dominikroser twostagedsstoevaluateoptimallocationsforbioenergyfacilities
AT markbrown twostagedsstoevaluateoptimallocationsforbioenergyfacilities