Human Error Assessment in City Gate Stations of Isfahan Natural Gas Company Using the System for Predictive Error Analysis and Reduction Framework

Introduction: Human factor analysis has been identified as the most common cause of accidents in natural gas transportation and distribution facilities. The occurrence of accidents at these systems, especially gas reduction stations located in residential and industrial areas, has had catastrophic c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rouhalah Fooladi, Ali Karimi, Adel Mazloumi, Mohsen Sharif Rohani, Rajabali Hokmabadi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022-12-01
Series:بهداشت و ایمنی کار
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6779-en.html
_version_ 1797943746015264768
author Rouhalah Fooladi
Ali Karimi
Adel Mazloumi
Mohsen Sharif Rohani
Rajabali Hokmabadi
author_facet Rouhalah Fooladi
Ali Karimi
Adel Mazloumi
Mohsen Sharif Rohani
Rajabali Hokmabadi
author_sort Rouhalah Fooladi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Human factor analysis has been identified as the most common cause of accidents in natural gas transportation and distribution facilities. The occurrence of accidents at these systems, especially gas reduction stations located in residential and industrial areas, has had catastrophic consequences. Therefore, this study aimed at analyzing critical tasks and human error assessment using the system for predictive error analysis and reduction (SPEAR) method and providing the appropriate framework for error management in the operation and maintenance of city gate stations. Material and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using the SPEAR framework and safety critical task analysis guideline to evaluate errors in gas pressure reduction stations. First, critical tasks were screened and evaluated, followed by performing task analysis by the hierarchical task analysis and detecting performance-influencing factors (PIF). Then, human errors were predicted and assessed based on the predictive human error analysis. Finally, error management was developed at three process, equipment, and training improvement levels. Results: In general, out of 23 operations and 164 sub-tasks, 12 critical tasks were identified based on the results. Criticality level percentages were about 67% high risk, 25% moderate, and 8% low risk. In addition, 134 errors were identified which were mostly related to action (42.53%) and checking (39.55%) errors, respectively. Eventually, communication, retrieval, and selection errors were 8.96, 5.22, and 3.74%, respectively. Conclusion: The results revealed that action and checking errors had the highest percentages. This method can be applied to appropriate the systems approach to error reduction using the PIF assessment output. The privilege affecting factors include preparing standard operation procedures, implementing a comprehensive training program, and controlling environmental hazards.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:27:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e82ffcb5b1754ff89d5a38f9b6435ac0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-807X
2383-2088
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:27:58Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series بهداشت و ایمنی کار
spelling doaj.art-e82ffcb5b1754ff89d5a38f9b6435ac02023-01-25T08:07:52ZfasTehran University of Medical Sciencesبهداشت و ایمنی کار2251-807X2383-20882022-12-01124930947Human Error Assessment in City Gate Stations of Isfahan Natural Gas Company Using the System for Predictive Error Analysis and Reduction FrameworkRouhalah Fooladi0Ali Karimi1Adel Mazloumi2Mohsen Sharif Rohani3Rajabali Hokmabadi4 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of health, Tehran University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of health, Tehran University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of health, Tehran University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran Safety and fire manager, Department of HSE, Natural Gas Company, Esfahan, Iran Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Faculty member of Health School, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran Introduction: Human factor analysis has been identified as the most common cause of accidents in natural gas transportation and distribution facilities. The occurrence of accidents at these systems, especially gas reduction stations located in residential and industrial areas, has had catastrophic consequences. Therefore, this study aimed at analyzing critical tasks and human error assessment using the system for predictive error analysis and reduction (SPEAR) method and providing the appropriate framework for error management in the operation and maintenance of city gate stations. Material and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using the SPEAR framework and safety critical task analysis guideline to evaluate errors in gas pressure reduction stations. First, critical tasks were screened and evaluated, followed by performing task analysis by the hierarchical task analysis and detecting performance-influencing factors (PIF). Then, human errors were predicted and assessed based on the predictive human error analysis. Finally, error management was developed at three process, equipment, and training improvement levels. Results: In general, out of 23 operations and 164 sub-tasks, 12 critical tasks were identified based on the results. Criticality level percentages were about 67% high risk, 25% moderate, and 8% low risk. In addition, 134 errors were identified which were mostly related to action (42.53%) and checking (39.55%) errors, respectively. Eventually, communication, retrieval, and selection errors were 8.96, 5.22, and 3.74%, respectively. Conclusion: The results revealed that action and checking errors had the highest percentages. This method can be applied to appropriate the systems approach to error reduction using the PIF assessment output. The privilege affecting factors include preparing standard operation procedures, implementing a comprehensive training program, and controlling environmental hazards.http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6779-en.htmlhuman error assessmentpredictive human error analysissystem for predictive error analysis and reductionsafety critical task analysiscity gate stations
spellingShingle Rouhalah Fooladi
Ali Karimi
Adel Mazloumi
Mohsen Sharif Rohani
Rajabali Hokmabadi
Human Error Assessment in City Gate Stations of Isfahan Natural Gas Company Using the System for Predictive Error Analysis and Reduction Framework
بهداشت و ایمنی کار
human error assessment
predictive human error analysis
system for predictive error analysis and reduction
safety critical task analysis
city gate stations
title Human Error Assessment in City Gate Stations of Isfahan Natural Gas Company Using the System for Predictive Error Analysis and Reduction Framework
title_full Human Error Assessment in City Gate Stations of Isfahan Natural Gas Company Using the System for Predictive Error Analysis and Reduction Framework
title_fullStr Human Error Assessment in City Gate Stations of Isfahan Natural Gas Company Using the System for Predictive Error Analysis and Reduction Framework
title_full_unstemmed Human Error Assessment in City Gate Stations of Isfahan Natural Gas Company Using the System for Predictive Error Analysis and Reduction Framework
title_short Human Error Assessment in City Gate Stations of Isfahan Natural Gas Company Using the System for Predictive Error Analysis and Reduction Framework
title_sort human error assessment in city gate stations of isfahan natural gas company using the system for predictive error analysis and reduction framework
topic human error assessment
predictive human error analysis
system for predictive error analysis and reduction
safety critical task analysis
city gate stations
url http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6779-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT rouhalahfooladi humanerrorassessmentincitygatestationsofisfahannaturalgascompanyusingthesystemforpredictiveerroranalysisandreductionframework
AT alikarimi humanerrorassessmentincitygatestationsofisfahannaturalgascompanyusingthesystemforpredictiveerroranalysisandreductionframework
AT adelmazloumi humanerrorassessmentincitygatestationsofisfahannaturalgascompanyusingthesystemforpredictiveerroranalysisandreductionframework
AT mohsensharifrohani humanerrorassessmentincitygatestationsofisfahannaturalgascompanyusingthesystemforpredictiveerroranalysisandreductionframework
AT rajabalihokmabadi humanerrorassessmentincitygatestationsofisfahannaturalgascompanyusingthesystemforpredictiveerroranalysisandreductionframework