Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection in Malaysia: a retrospective study

Objectives Feline ownership is popular and represents the largest segment of the pet population in Malaysia. Most feline owners own, on average, 2–3 cats, with some having >10 cats per household. Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) are two clinically important vi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amilan Sivagurunathan, Asem M Atwa, Remo Lobetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-02-01
Series:Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Open Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2055116917752587
_version_ 1818081355216453632
author Amilan Sivagurunathan
Asem M Atwa
Remo Lobetti
author_facet Amilan Sivagurunathan
Asem M Atwa
Remo Lobetti
author_sort Amilan Sivagurunathan
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Feline ownership is popular and represents the largest segment of the pet population in Malaysia. Most feline owners own, on average, 2–3 cats, with some having >10 cats per household. Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) are two clinically important viral infections in cats. Documenting the prevalence of these diseases in the feline population is important for both veterinarians and the public. Methods This was a retrospective study, using data collected from the domestic cat population seen at a 24 h private veterinary hospital in Malaysia, to determine the prevalence of FIV and FeLV in an urban area and risk factors associated with these infections. Between 2010 and 2016, 2230 blood samples were collected and tested for FIV antibodies and FeLV antigen using commercially available ELISA test kits. Results In total, 10.0% (n = 224; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.80–11.26) were seropositive for FIV; 12.0% (n = 267; 95% CI 10.62–13.32) were seropositive for FeLV; and 2.6% (n = 58; 95% CI 2.01–3.17) were seropositive for both. Conclusions and relevance The prevalence of FIV is lower and FeLV higher than previously documented for this region. Because of the immunosuppressive potential of both viruses, client education and use of appropriate control strategies such as routine screening, vaccination and eradication should be considered.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T19:04:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e832c074ecdf4f91abc1d6f50c450c2d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-1169
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T19:04:53Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Open Reports
spelling doaj.art-e832c074ecdf4f91abc1d6f50c450c2d2022-12-22T01:36:55ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Open Reports2055-11692018-02-01410.1177/2055116917752587Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection in Malaysia: a retrospective studyAmilan Sivagurunathan0Asem M Atwa1Remo Lobetti2Animal Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaAnimal Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaBryanston Veterinary Hospital, Bryanston, South AfricaObjectives Feline ownership is popular and represents the largest segment of the pet population in Malaysia. Most feline owners own, on average, 2–3 cats, with some having >10 cats per household. Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) are two clinically important viral infections in cats. Documenting the prevalence of these diseases in the feline population is important for both veterinarians and the public. Methods This was a retrospective study, using data collected from the domestic cat population seen at a 24 h private veterinary hospital in Malaysia, to determine the prevalence of FIV and FeLV in an urban area and risk factors associated with these infections. Between 2010 and 2016, 2230 blood samples were collected and tested for FIV antibodies and FeLV antigen using commercially available ELISA test kits. Results In total, 10.0% (n = 224; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.80–11.26) were seropositive for FIV; 12.0% (n = 267; 95% CI 10.62–13.32) were seropositive for FeLV; and 2.6% (n = 58; 95% CI 2.01–3.17) were seropositive for both. Conclusions and relevance The prevalence of FIV is lower and FeLV higher than previously documented for this region. Because of the immunosuppressive potential of both viruses, client education and use of appropriate control strategies such as routine screening, vaccination and eradication should be considered.https://doi.org/10.1177/2055116917752587
spellingShingle Amilan Sivagurunathan
Asem M Atwa
Remo Lobetti
Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection in Malaysia: a retrospective study
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Open Reports
title Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection in Malaysia: a retrospective study
title_full Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection in Malaysia: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection in Malaysia: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection in Malaysia: a retrospective study
title_short Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection in Malaysia: a retrospective study
title_sort prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection in malaysia a retrospective study
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2055116917752587
work_keys_str_mv AT amilansivagurunathan prevalenceoffelineimmunodeficiencyvirusandfelineleukaemiavirusinfectioninmalaysiaaretrospectivestudy
AT asemmatwa prevalenceoffelineimmunodeficiencyvirusandfelineleukaemiavirusinfectioninmalaysiaaretrospectivestudy
AT remolobetti prevalenceoffelineimmunodeficiencyvirusandfelineleukaemiavirusinfectioninmalaysiaaretrospectivestudy