Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Conduction disturbances such as left bundle branch block (LBBB) and complete atrio-ventricular block (cAVB) are relatively frequent complications following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We investigated the dynamics of these conduction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas T. Poels, Elien B. Engels, Suzanne Kats, Leo Veenstra, Vincent van Ommen, Kevin Vernooy, Jos G. Maessen, Frits W. Prinzen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/7/695
_version_ 1797526686800019456
author Thomas T. Poels
Elien B. Engels
Suzanne Kats
Leo Veenstra
Vincent van Ommen
Kevin Vernooy
Jos G. Maessen
Frits W. Prinzen
author_facet Thomas T. Poels
Elien B. Engels
Suzanne Kats
Leo Veenstra
Vincent van Ommen
Kevin Vernooy
Jos G. Maessen
Frits W. Prinzen
author_sort Thomas T. Poels
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background and Objectives</i>: Conduction disturbances such as left bundle branch block (LBBB) and complete atrio-ventricular block (cAVB) are relatively frequent complications following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We investigated the dynamics of these conduction blocks to further understand luxating factors and predictors for their persistency. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: We prospectively included 157 consecutive patients who underwent a TAVI procedure. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained at specific time points during the TAVI procedure and at follow-up until at least six months post-procedure. <i>Results:</i> Of the 106 patients with a narrow QRS complex (nQRS) before TAVI, ~70% developed LBBB; 28 (26.4%) being classified as super-transient (ST-LBBB), 20 (18.9%) as transient (T-LBBB) and 24 (22.6%) as persistent (P-LBBB). Risk of LBBB was higher for self-expandable (SE) than for balloon-expandable (BE) prostheses and increased with larger implant depth. During the TAVI procedure conduction disturbances showed a dynamic behavior, as illustrated by alternating kinds of blocks in 18 cases. Most LBBBs developed during balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and at positioning and deployment of the TAVI prosthesis. The incidence of LBBB was not significantly different between patients who did and did not undergo BAV prior to TAVI implantation (65.3% and 74.2%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.494)). Progression to cAVB was most frequent for patients with preexisting conduction abnormalities (5/34) patients) and in patients showing ST-LBBB (6/28). <i>Conclusions</i>: During the TAVI procedure, conduction disturbances showed a dynamic behavior with alternating types of block in 18 cases. After a dynamic period of often alternating types of block, most BBBs are reversible while one third persist. Patients with ST-LBBB are most prone to progressing into cAVB. The observation that the incidence of developing LBBB after TAVI is similar with and without BAV suggests that a subgroup of patients has a substrate to develop LBBB regardless of the procedure.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:32:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e8335b967d6249f3a18cfe0e19bf68de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:32:53Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj.art-e8335b967d6249f3a18cfe0e19bf68de2023-11-22T04:21:15ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442021-07-0157769510.3390/medicina57070695Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve ImplantationThomas T. Poels0Elien B. Engels1Suzanne Kats2Leo Veenstra3Vincent van Ommen4Kevin Vernooy5Jos G. Maessen6Frits W. Prinzen7Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800 Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, P.O. Box 616 Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800 Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800 Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800 Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800 Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800 Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, P.O. Box 616 Maastricht, The Netherlands<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Conduction disturbances such as left bundle branch block (LBBB) and complete atrio-ventricular block (cAVB) are relatively frequent complications following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We investigated the dynamics of these conduction blocks to further understand luxating factors and predictors for their persistency. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: We prospectively included 157 consecutive patients who underwent a TAVI procedure. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained at specific time points during the TAVI procedure and at follow-up until at least six months post-procedure. <i>Results:</i> Of the 106 patients with a narrow QRS complex (nQRS) before TAVI, ~70% developed LBBB; 28 (26.4%) being classified as super-transient (ST-LBBB), 20 (18.9%) as transient (T-LBBB) and 24 (22.6%) as persistent (P-LBBB). Risk of LBBB was higher for self-expandable (SE) than for balloon-expandable (BE) prostheses and increased with larger implant depth. During the TAVI procedure conduction disturbances showed a dynamic behavior, as illustrated by alternating kinds of blocks in 18 cases. Most LBBBs developed during balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and at positioning and deployment of the TAVI prosthesis. The incidence of LBBB was not significantly different between patients who did and did not undergo BAV prior to TAVI implantation (65.3% and 74.2%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.494)). Progression to cAVB was most frequent for patients with preexisting conduction abnormalities (5/34) patients) and in patients showing ST-LBBB (6/28). <i>Conclusions</i>: During the TAVI procedure, conduction disturbances showed a dynamic behavior with alternating types of block in 18 cases. After a dynamic period of often alternating types of block, most BBBs are reversible while one third persist. Patients with ST-LBBB are most prone to progressing into cAVB. The observation that the incidence of developing LBBB after TAVI is similar with and without BAV suggests that a subgroup of patients has a substrate to develop LBBB regardless of the procedure.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/7/695transcatheter aortic valve implantationleft bundle branch blockelectrocardiogram
spellingShingle Thomas T. Poels
Elien B. Engels
Suzanne Kats
Leo Veenstra
Vincent van Ommen
Kevin Vernooy
Jos G. Maessen
Frits W. Prinzen
Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Medicina
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
left bundle branch block
electrocardiogram
title Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_full Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_fullStr Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_short Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_sort occurrence and persistency of conduction disturbances during transcatheter aortic valve implantation
topic transcatheter aortic valve implantation
left bundle branch block
electrocardiogram
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/7/695
work_keys_str_mv AT thomastpoels occurrenceandpersistencyofconductiondisturbancesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT elienbengels occurrenceandpersistencyofconductiondisturbancesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT suzannekats occurrenceandpersistencyofconductiondisturbancesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT leoveenstra occurrenceandpersistencyofconductiondisturbancesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT vincentvanommen occurrenceandpersistencyofconductiondisturbancesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT kevinvernooy occurrenceandpersistencyofconductiondisturbancesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT josgmaessen occurrenceandpersistencyofconductiondisturbancesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT fritswprinzen occurrenceandpersistencyofconductiondisturbancesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation