Differentiation between the Concurrence of Offences and the Unity of Offence with Multiple Passive Subject

In the content of the article, the author sets out the practical, concrete way in which, with the help of technical-legal reasoning of the inductive method - typical of criminology - reasoning that underlie both the qualification of criminal acts and the legal framework can be analyzed and argued,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ștefănuț Radu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Danubius University 2021-06-01
Series:EIRP Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dp.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/EIRP/article/view/229/226
_version_ 1818199526222069760
author Ștefănuț Radu
author_facet Ștefănuț Radu
author_sort Ștefănuț Radu
collection DOAJ
description In the content of the article, the author sets out the practical, concrete way in which, with the help of technical-legal reasoning of the inductive method - typical of criminology - reasoning that underlie both the qualification of criminal acts and the legal framework can be analyzed and argued, setting out the criteria for differentiating between unity and plurality of offences in cases of plurality of subjects or multiple passive subject. The aspects presented have a certain scientific value that must be considered both at the time of legislating criminalizations (of the legal qualification) and by the practitioner on the occasion of the investigation of such criminal acts. The novelty of the study is the need for the legislator to address the plurality of social values defended in the complex offence, fundamental values in relation to the plurality of actions / inactions within this type of criminalization.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T02:23:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e83f7d7bcc3e40e98351c1a9300fd8eb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2067-9211
2069-9344
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T02:23:10Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Danubius University
record_format Article
series EIRP Proceedings
spelling doaj.art-e83f7d7bcc3e40e98351c1a9300fd8eb2022-12-22T00:41:37ZengDanubius UniversityEIRP Proceedings2067-92112069-93442021-06-01161504507Differentiation between the Concurrence of Offences and the Unity of Offence with Multiple Passive SubjectȘtefănuț Radu0Danubius University of GalatiIn the content of the article, the author sets out the practical, concrete way in which, with the help of technical-legal reasoning of the inductive method - typical of criminology - reasoning that underlie both the qualification of criminal acts and the legal framework can be analyzed and argued, setting out the criteria for differentiating between unity and plurality of offences in cases of plurality of subjects or multiple passive subject. The aspects presented have a certain scientific value that must be considered both at the time of legislating criminalizations (of the legal qualification) and by the practitioner on the occasion of the investigation of such criminal acts. The novelty of the study is the need for the legislator to address the plurality of social values defended in the complex offence, fundamental values in relation to the plurality of actions / inactions within this type of criminalization.https://dp.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/EIRP/article/view/229/226criminal justice practicecriminal policyviolatedcriminal consequences
spellingShingle Ștefănuț Radu
Differentiation between the Concurrence of Offences and the Unity of Offence with Multiple Passive Subject
EIRP Proceedings
criminal justice practice
criminal policy
violated
criminal consequences
title Differentiation between the Concurrence of Offences and the Unity of Offence with Multiple Passive Subject
title_full Differentiation between the Concurrence of Offences and the Unity of Offence with Multiple Passive Subject
title_fullStr Differentiation between the Concurrence of Offences and the Unity of Offence with Multiple Passive Subject
title_full_unstemmed Differentiation between the Concurrence of Offences and the Unity of Offence with Multiple Passive Subject
title_short Differentiation between the Concurrence of Offences and the Unity of Offence with Multiple Passive Subject
title_sort differentiation between the concurrence of offences and the unity of offence with multiple passive subject
topic criminal justice practice
criminal policy
violated
criminal consequences
url https://dp.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/EIRP/article/view/229/226
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanutradu differentiationbetweentheconcurrenceofoffencesandtheunityofoffencewithmultiplepassivesubject