Upper-limb interval versus constant-load exercise in patients with COPD: a physiological crossover study

Objective Upper-limb exercise is recommended for patients with COPD, albeit there are limited data concerning the optimal modality to implement. We compared interval (INT-EX) to continuous (CONT-EX) upper-limb exercise in terms of exercise tolerance, ventilatory and metabolic responses when both con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mara Paneroni, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Alessandro Cavicchia, Beatrice Salvi, Laura Bertacchini, Massimo Venturelli, Michele Vitacca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Respiratory Society 2024-02-01
Series:ERJ Open Research
Online Access:http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/10/1/00779-2023.full
_version_ 1827330643545030656
author Mara Paneroni
Ioannis Vogiatzis
Alessandro Cavicchia
Beatrice Salvi
Laura Bertacchini
Massimo Venturelli
Michele Vitacca
author_facet Mara Paneroni
Ioannis Vogiatzis
Alessandro Cavicchia
Beatrice Salvi
Laura Bertacchini
Massimo Venturelli
Michele Vitacca
author_sort Mara Paneroni
collection DOAJ
description Objective Upper-limb exercise is recommended for patients with COPD, albeit there are limited data concerning the optimal modality to implement. We compared interval (INT-EX) to continuous (CONT-EX) upper-limb exercise in terms of exercise tolerance, ventilatory and metabolic responses when both conditions were sustained at an equivalent work rate. Methods 26 stable COPD patients undertook three upper-limb exercise sessions to initially establish peak work rate (PWR) via an incremental exercise test and subsequently two equivalent work rate tests to the limit tolerance in balanced order: 1) INT-EX consisting of 30-s work at 100% PWR interspersed with 30-s work at 40% of PWR; and 2) CONT-EX at 70% PWR. Results 20 patients (76.9%) had longer tolerance during INT-EX, while six out of 26 (23.1%) exhibited longer tolerance during CONT-EX. The average endurance time was 434.1±184.7 and 315.7±128.7 s for INT-EX and CONT-EX, respectively. During INT-EX at isotime (i.e. when work completed was the same between INT-EX and CONT-EX), the majority of patients manifested lower oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, pulmonary hyperinflation, heart rate, symptoms and higher CO2 blood concentration. Patients with longer INT-EX had a lower comorbidity score (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale: 1.58±0.30 versus 1.88±0.29, p=0.0395) and better-preserved lung function (forced vital capacity 84.7±15.31% versus 67.67±20.56%, p=0.0367; forced expiratory volume in 1 s 57.15±14.59 versus 44.67±12.99% predicted, p=0.0725) compared to patients with longer CONT-EX. Conclusion INT-EX is more sustainable than CONT-EX for the majority of COPD patients with moderate obstruction, leading to lower dynamic hyperinflation and symptoms at isotime. Further studies need to define the benefits of its application during pulmonary rehabilitation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T16:15:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e847493900764d1d832bd74c967d1892
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2312-0541
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T16:15:24Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format Article
series ERJ Open Research
spelling doaj.art-e847493900764d1d832bd74c967d18922024-03-04T11:30:00ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyERJ Open Research2312-05412024-02-0110110.1183/23120541.00779-202300779-2023Upper-limb interval versus constant-load exercise in patients with COPD: a physiological crossover studyMara Paneroni0Ioannis Vogiatzis1Alessandro Cavicchia2Beatrice Salvi3Laura Bertacchini4Massimo Venturelli5Michele Vitacca6 Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation of the Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy Northumbria University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Newcastle, UK University of Verona, Department of Neurosciences Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Verona, Italy Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation of the Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation of the Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy University of Verona, Department of Neurosciences Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Verona, Italy Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation of the Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy Objective Upper-limb exercise is recommended for patients with COPD, albeit there are limited data concerning the optimal modality to implement. We compared interval (INT-EX) to continuous (CONT-EX) upper-limb exercise in terms of exercise tolerance, ventilatory and metabolic responses when both conditions were sustained at an equivalent work rate. Methods 26 stable COPD patients undertook three upper-limb exercise sessions to initially establish peak work rate (PWR) via an incremental exercise test and subsequently two equivalent work rate tests to the limit tolerance in balanced order: 1) INT-EX consisting of 30-s work at 100% PWR interspersed with 30-s work at 40% of PWR; and 2) CONT-EX at 70% PWR. Results 20 patients (76.9%) had longer tolerance during INT-EX, while six out of 26 (23.1%) exhibited longer tolerance during CONT-EX. The average endurance time was 434.1±184.7 and 315.7±128.7 s for INT-EX and CONT-EX, respectively. During INT-EX at isotime (i.e. when work completed was the same between INT-EX and CONT-EX), the majority of patients manifested lower oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, pulmonary hyperinflation, heart rate, symptoms and higher CO2 blood concentration. Patients with longer INT-EX had a lower comorbidity score (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale: 1.58±0.30 versus 1.88±0.29, p=0.0395) and better-preserved lung function (forced vital capacity 84.7±15.31% versus 67.67±20.56%, p=0.0367; forced expiratory volume in 1 s 57.15±14.59 versus 44.67±12.99% predicted, p=0.0725) compared to patients with longer CONT-EX. Conclusion INT-EX is more sustainable than CONT-EX for the majority of COPD patients with moderate obstruction, leading to lower dynamic hyperinflation and symptoms at isotime. Further studies need to define the benefits of its application during pulmonary rehabilitation.http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/10/1/00779-2023.full
spellingShingle Mara Paneroni
Ioannis Vogiatzis
Alessandro Cavicchia
Beatrice Salvi
Laura Bertacchini
Massimo Venturelli
Michele Vitacca
Upper-limb interval versus constant-load exercise in patients with COPD: a physiological crossover study
ERJ Open Research
title Upper-limb interval versus constant-load exercise in patients with COPD: a physiological crossover study
title_full Upper-limb interval versus constant-load exercise in patients with COPD: a physiological crossover study
title_fullStr Upper-limb interval versus constant-load exercise in patients with COPD: a physiological crossover study
title_full_unstemmed Upper-limb interval versus constant-load exercise in patients with COPD: a physiological crossover study
title_short Upper-limb interval versus constant-load exercise in patients with COPD: a physiological crossover study
title_sort upper limb interval versus constant load exercise in patients with copd a physiological crossover study
url http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/10/1/00779-2023.full
work_keys_str_mv AT marapaneroni upperlimbintervalversusconstantloadexerciseinpatientswithcopdaphysiologicalcrossoverstudy
AT ioannisvogiatzis upperlimbintervalversusconstantloadexerciseinpatientswithcopdaphysiologicalcrossoverstudy
AT alessandrocavicchia upperlimbintervalversusconstantloadexerciseinpatientswithcopdaphysiologicalcrossoverstudy
AT beatricesalvi upperlimbintervalversusconstantloadexerciseinpatientswithcopdaphysiologicalcrossoverstudy
AT laurabertacchini upperlimbintervalversusconstantloadexerciseinpatientswithcopdaphysiologicalcrossoverstudy
AT massimoventurelli upperlimbintervalversusconstantloadexerciseinpatientswithcopdaphysiologicalcrossoverstudy
AT michelevitacca upperlimbintervalversusconstantloadexerciseinpatientswithcopdaphysiologicalcrossoverstudy