Real Deletion, Time, and Possibility
Abstract: Does anything ever really “go away,” completely? This paper is a search for “real deletion,” and the metaphysics that must accompany real deletion. Why is that important? In artificial intelligence studies, researchers have offered a moving target for when artificial intelligence has been...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Analiza i Egzystencja |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wnus.usz.edu.pl/aie/en/issue/1237/article/19900/ |
_version_ | 1797692973623803904 |
---|---|
author | Randall Auxier |
author_facet | Randall Auxier |
author_sort | Randall Auxier |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract:
Does anything ever really “go away,” completely? This paper is a search for “real deletion,” and the metaphysics that must accompany real deletion. Why is that important? In artificial intelligence studies, researchers have offered a moving target for when artificial intelligence has been achieved. It began with the Turing test and has evolved through a thousand arguments (e.g., Dreyfuss’ What Computers Can’t Do, through Kurzweil’s “singularity” and into a hundred other criteria and thousands of discussions about what intelligence is and what it would mean to simulate or, as I favor, emulate it). This whole discussion is still just sorting through analogies to human intelligence, not approaching the thing itself, but good analogies must approach much more than analogous function: they must approach real indiscernibility. My arguments here will therefore be largely in the field of metaphysics and ontology, which is how I understand the word “real” in the phrase “real deletion.” I do not think that current researchers have rightly understood time and how it bears upon the criterion or. criteria of artificial intelligence. Hence, I offer “real deletion,” in the sense to be described, as the criterion. The AI argument has implications for all of metaphysics as it relates to the fundamental character of time. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:35:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e84eb91cf26844948e39bfa414998ba8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1734-9923 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:35:50Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego |
record_format | Article |
series | Analiza i Egzystencja |
spelling | doaj.art-e84eb91cf26844948e39bfa414998ba82023-09-04T18:22:21ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoAnaliza i Egzystencja1734-99232023-01-016210.18276/aie.2023.62-01Real Deletion, Time, and PossibilityRandall Auxier0Southern Illinois University, CarbondaleAbstract: Does anything ever really “go away,” completely? This paper is a search for “real deletion,” and the metaphysics that must accompany real deletion. Why is that important? In artificial intelligence studies, researchers have offered a moving target for when artificial intelligence has been achieved. It began with the Turing test and has evolved through a thousand arguments (e.g., Dreyfuss’ What Computers Can’t Do, through Kurzweil’s “singularity” and into a hundred other criteria and thousands of discussions about what intelligence is and what it would mean to simulate or, as I favor, emulate it). This whole discussion is still just sorting through analogies to human intelligence, not approaching the thing itself, but good analogies must approach much more than analogous function: they must approach real indiscernibility. My arguments here will therefore be largely in the field of metaphysics and ontology, which is how I understand the word “real” in the phrase “real deletion.” I do not think that current researchers have rightly understood time and how it bears upon the criterion or. criteria of artificial intelligence. Hence, I offer “real deletion,” in the sense to be described, as the criterion. The AI argument has implications for all of metaphysics as it relates to the fundamental character of time.https://wnus.usz.edu.pl/aie/en/issue/1237/article/19900/czasprocessztuczna inteligencjaczasowośćpotencjaWhitehead |
spellingShingle | Randall Auxier Real Deletion, Time, and Possibility Analiza i Egzystencja czas proces sztuczna inteligencja czasowość potencja Whitehead |
title | Real Deletion, Time, and Possibility |
title_full | Real Deletion, Time, and Possibility |
title_fullStr | Real Deletion, Time, and Possibility |
title_full_unstemmed | Real Deletion, Time, and Possibility |
title_short | Real Deletion, Time, and Possibility |
title_sort | real deletion time and possibility |
topic | czas proces sztuczna inteligencja czasowość potencja Whitehead |
url | https://wnus.usz.edu.pl/aie/en/issue/1237/article/19900/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT randallauxier realdeletiontimeandpossibility |