Perspectives of U.S. harm reduction advocates on persuasive message strategies

Abstract Background The messages used to communicate about harm reduction are critical in garnering public support for adoption of harm reduction interventions. Despite the demonstrated effectiveness of harm reduction interventions at reducing overdose deaths and disease transmission, the USA has be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah A. White, Rachel Lee, Alene Kennedy-Hendricks, Susan G. Sherman, Emma E. McGinty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-08-01
Series:Harm Reduction Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00849-z
_version_ 1797453444524539904
author Sarah A. White
Rachel Lee
Alene Kennedy-Hendricks
Susan G. Sherman
Emma E. McGinty
author_facet Sarah A. White
Rachel Lee
Alene Kennedy-Hendricks
Susan G. Sherman
Emma E. McGinty
author_sort Sarah A. White
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The messages used to communicate about harm reduction are critical in garnering public support for adoption of harm reduction interventions. Despite the demonstrated effectiveness of harm reduction interventions at reducing overdose deaths and disease transmission, the USA has been slow to adopt harm reduction to scale. Implementation of evidence-based interventions has been hindered by a historical framing of drug use as a moral failure and related stigmatizing attitudes among the public toward people who use drugs. Understanding how professional harm reduction advocates communicate to audiences about the benefits of harm reduction is a critical step to designing persuasive messaging strategies. Methods We conducted qualitative interviews with a purposively recruited sample of U.S. professional harm reduction advocates (N = 15) to examine their perspectives on which types of messages are effective in persuading U.S. audiences on the value of harm reduction. Participants were professionals working in harm reduction advocacy at national- or state-level organizations promoting and/or implementing harm reduction. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a hybrid inductive/deductive approach. Results Interviewees agreed that messages about the scientific evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of harm reduction approaches are important but insufficient, on their own, to persuade audiences. Interviewees identified two overarching messaging strategies they perceived as persuasive: using messages about harm reduction that align with audience-specific values, for example centering the value of life or individual redemption; and positioning harm reduction as part of the comprehensive solution to current issues audiences are facing related to drug use and overdose in their community. Interviewees discussed tailoring messages strategies to four key audiences: policymakers; law enforcement; religious groups; and the family and friends of people who use, or have used, drugs. For example, advocates discussed framing messages to law enforcement from the perspective of public safety. Conclusions Interviewees viewed messages as most persuasive when they align with audience values and audience-specific concerns related to drug use and overdose death. Future research should test effectiveness of tailored messaging strategies to audiences using experimental approaches.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:22:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e84ee6842034451fa22c6bf840ba1d72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7517
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:22:55Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Harm Reduction Journal
spelling doaj.art-e84ee6842034451fa22c6bf840ba1d722023-11-26T12:44:49ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172023-08-012011810.1186/s12954-023-00849-zPerspectives of U.S. harm reduction advocates on persuasive message strategiesSarah A. White0Rachel Lee1Alene Kennedy-Hendricks2Susan G. Sherman3Emma E. McGinty4Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins UniversityHealth Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthHealth, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthHealth Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthAbstract Background The messages used to communicate about harm reduction are critical in garnering public support for adoption of harm reduction interventions. Despite the demonstrated effectiveness of harm reduction interventions at reducing overdose deaths and disease transmission, the USA has been slow to adopt harm reduction to scale. Implementation of evidence-based interventions has been hindered by a historical framing of drug use as a moral failure and related stigmatizing attitudes among the public toward people who use drugs. Understanding how professional harm reduction advocates communicate to audiences about the benefits of harm reduction is a critical step to designing persuasive messaging strategies. Methods We conducted qualitative interviews with a purposively recruited sample of U.S. professional harm reduction advocates (N = 15) to examine their perspectives on which types of messages are effective in persuading U.S. audiences on the value of harm reduction. Participants were professionals working in harm reduction advocacy at national- or state-level organizations promoting and/or implementing harm reduction. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a hybrid inductive/deductive approach. Results Interviewees agreed that messages about the scientific evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of harm reduction approaches are important but insufficient, on their own, to persuade audiences. Interviewees identified two overarching messaging strategies they perceived as persuasive: using messages about harm reduction that align with audience-specific values, for example centering the value of life or individual redemption; and positioning harm reduction as part of the comprehensive solution to current issues audiences are facing related to drug use and overdose in their community. Interviewees discussed tailoring messages strategies to four key audiences: policymakers; law enforcement; religious groups; and the family and friends of people who use, or have used, drugs. For example, advocates discussed framing messages to law enforcement from the perspective of public safety. Conclusions Interviewees viewed messages as most persuasive when they align with audience values and audience-specific concerns related to drug use and overdose death. Future research should test effectiveness of tailored messaging strategies to audiences using experimental approaches.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00849-zHarm reductionMessage strategiesQualitative research
spellingShingle Sarah A. White
Rachel Lee
Alene Kennedy-Hendricks
Susan G. Sherman
Emma E. McGinty
Perspectives of U.S. harm reduction advocates on persuasive message strategies
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm reduction
Message strategies
Qualitative research
title Perspectives of U.S. harm reduction advocates on persuasive message strategies
title_full Perspectives of U.S. harm reduction advocates on persuasive message strategies
title_fullStr Perspectives of U.S. harm reduction advocates on persuasive message strategies
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives of U.S. harm reduction advocates on persuasive message strategies
title_short Perspectives of U.S. harm reduction advocates on persuasive message strategies
title_sort perspectives of u s harm reduction advocates on persuasive message strategies
topic Harm reduction
Message strategies
Qualitative research
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00849-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahawhite perspectivesofusharmreductionadvocatesonpersuasivemessagestrategies
AT rachellee perspectivesofusharmreductionadvocatesonpersuasivemessagestrategies
AT alenekennedyhendricks perspectivesofusharmreductionadvocatesonpersuasivemessagestrategies
AT susangsherman perspectivesofusharmreductionadvocatesonpersuasivemessagestrategies
AT emmaemcginty perspectivesofusharmreductionadvocatesonpersuasivemessagestrategies