New perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty: More or better data
Uncertainty is an important and fundamental concept in physics education. Students are often first exposed to uncertainty in introductory labs, expand their knowledge across lab courses, and then are introduced to quantum mechanical uncertainty in upper-division courses. This study is part of a larg...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2023-07-01
|
Series: | Physical Review Physics Education Research |
Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020105 |
_version_ | 1797777100190515200 |
---|---|
author | Andy Schang Matthew Dew Emily M. Stump N. G. Holmes Gina Passante |
author_facet | Andy Schang Matthew Dew Emily M. Stump N. G. Holmes Gina Passante |
author_sort | Andy Schang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Uncertainty is an important and fundamental concept in physics education. Students are often first exposed to uncertainty in introductory labs, expand their knowledge across lab courses, and then are introduced to quantum mechanical uncertainty in upper-division courses. This study is part of a larger project evaluating student thinking about uncertainty across these contexts. In this research, we investigate advanced physics student thinking about uncertainty by asking them conceptual questions about how a hypothetical distribution of measurements would change if “more” or “better” data were collected in four different experimental scenarios. The scenarios include both classical and quantum experiments, as well as experiments that theoretically result in an expected single value or an expected distribution. This investigation is motivated by our goal of finding insights into students’ potential point- and setlike thinking about uncertainty and of shining light on the limitations of those binary paradigms. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T23:00:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e8511b5de7684569b0ef29908773ecbe |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2469-9896 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T23:00:16Z |
publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
publisher | American Physical Society |
record_format | Article |
series | Physical Review Physics Education Research |
spelling | doaj.art-e8511b5de7684569b0ef29908773ecbe2023-07-19T14:24:13ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962023-07-0119202010510.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020105New perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty: More or better dataAndy SchangMatthew DewEmily M. StumpN. G. HolmesGina PassanteUncertainty is an important and fundamental concept in physics education. Students are often first exposed to uncertainty in introductory labs, expand their knowledge across lab courses, and then are introduced to quantum mechanical uncertainty in upper-division courses. This study is part of a larger project evaluating student thinking about uncertainty across these contexts. In this research, we investigate advanced physics student thinking about uncertainty by asking them conceptual questions about how a hypothetical distribution of measurements would change if “more” or “better” data were collected in four different experimental scenarios. The scenarios include both classical and quantum experiments, as well as experiments that theoretically result in an expected single value or an expected distribution. This investigation is motivated by our goal of finding insights into students’ potential point- and setlike thinking about uncertainty and of shining light on the limitations of those binary paradigms.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020105 |
spellingShingle | Andy Schang Matthew Dew Emily M. Stump N. G. Holmes Gina Passante New perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty: More or better data Physical Review Physics Education Research |
title | New perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty: More or better data |
title_full | New perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty: More or better data |
title_fullStr | New perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty: More or better data |
title_full_unstemmed | New perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty: More or better data |
title_short | New perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty: More or better data |
title_sort | new perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty more or better data |
url | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andyschang newperspectivesonstudentreasoningaboutmeasurementuncertaintymoreorbetterdata AT matthewdew newperspectivesonstudentreasoningaboutmeasurementuncertaintymoreorbetterdata AT emilymstump newperspectivesonstudentreasoningaboutmeasurementuncertaintymoreorbetterdata AT ngholmes newperspectivesonstudentreasoningaboutmeasurementuncertaintymoreorbetterdata AT ginapassante newperspectivesonstudentreasoningaboutmeasurementuncertaintymoreorbetterdata |