The Complexity of Comparative Adsorption of C<sub>6</sub> Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Cyclohexane, <em>n</em>-Hexane) at Metal–Organic Frameworks

The relatively stable MOFs Alfum, MIL-160, DUT-4, DUT-5, MIL-53-TDC, MIL-53, UiO-66, UiO-66-NH<sub>2</sub>, UiO-66(F)<sub>4</sub>, UiO-67, DUT-67, NH<sub>2</sub>-MIL-125, MIL-125, MIL-101(Cr), ZIF-8, ZIF-11 and ZIF-7 were studied for their C<sub>6</sub>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Jansen, Nabil Assahub, Alex Spieß, Jun Liang, Alexa Schmitz, Shanghua Xing, Serkan Gökpinar, Christoph Janiak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Nanomaterials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/12/20/3614
_version_ 1797470787192487936
author Christian Jansen
Nabil Assahub
Alex Spieß
Jun Liang
Alexa Schmitz
Shanghua Xing
Serkan Gökpinar
Christoph Janiak
author_facet Christian Jansen
Nabil Assahub
Alex Spieß
Jun Liang
Alexa Schmitz
Shanghua Xing
Serkan Gökpinar
Christoph Janiak
author_sort Christian Jansen
collection DOAJ
description The relatively stable MOFs Alfum, MIL-160, DUT-4, DUT-5, MIL-53-TDC, MIL-53, UiO-66, UiO-66-NH<sub>2</sub>, UiO-66(F)<sub>4</sub>, UiO-67, DUT-67, NH<sub>2</sub>-MIL-125, MIL-125, MIL-101(Cr), ZIF-8, ZIF-11 and ZIF-7 were studied for their C<sub>6</sub> sorption properties. An understanding of the uptake of the larger C<sub>6</sub> molecules cannot simply be achieved with surface area and pore volume (from N<sub>2</sub> sorption) but involves the complex micropore structure of the MOF. The maximum adsorption capacity at p p<sub>0</sub><sup>−1</sup> = 0.9 was shown by DUT-4 for benzene, MIL-101(Cr) for cyclohexane and DUT-5 for <i>n</i>-hexane. In the low-pressure range from p p<sub>0</sub><sup>−1</sup> = 0.1 down to 0.05 the highest benzene uptake is given by DUT-5, DUT-67/UiO-67 and MIL-101(Cr), for cyclohexane and <i>n</i>-hexane by DUT-5, UiO-67 and MIL-101(Cr). The highest uptake capacity at p p<sub>0</sub><sup>−1</sup> = 0.02 was seen with MIL-53 for benzene, MIL-125 for cyclohexane and DUT-5 for <i>n</i>-hexane. DUT-5 and MIL-101(Cr) are the MOFs with the widest pore window openings/cross sections but the low-pressure uptake seems to be controlled by a complex combination of ligand and pore-size effect. IAST selectivities between the three binary mixtures show a finely tuned and difficult to predict interplay of pore window size with (critical) adsorptive size and possibly a role of electrostatics through functional groups such as NH<sub>2</sub>.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:40:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e87d2f79207a4521afed0dcd027cf0cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-4991
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:40:56Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nanomaterials
spelling doaj.art-e87d2f79207a4521afed0dcd027cf0cb2023-11-24T01:40:17ZengMDPI AGNanomaterials2079-49912022-10-011220361410.3390/nano12203614The Complexity of Comparative Adsorption of C<sub>6</sub> Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Cyclohexane, <em>n</em>-Hexane) at Metal–Organic FrameworksChristian Jansen0Nabil Assahub1Alex Spieß2Jun Liang3Alexa Schmitz4Shanghua Xing5Serkan Gökpinar6Christoph Janiak7Institut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, D-40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, D-40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, D-40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, D-40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, D-40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, D-40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyMicrotrac Retsch GmbH, Retsch-Allee 1-5, D-42781 Haan, GermanyInstitut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, D-40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyThe relatively stable MOFs Alfum, MIL-160, DUT-4, DUT-5, MIL-53-TDC, MIL-53, UiO-66, UiO-66-NH<sub>2</sub>, UiO-66(F)<sub>4</sub>, UiO-67, DUT-67, NH<sub>2</sub>-MIL-125, MIL-125, MIL-101(Cr), ZIF-8, ZIF-11 and ZIF-7 were studied for their C<sub>6</sub> sorption properties. An understanding of the uptake of the larger C<sub>6</sub> molecules cannot simply be achieved with surface area and pore volume (from N<sub>2</sub> sorption) but involves the complex micropore structure of the MOF. The maximum adsorption capacity at p p<sub>0</sub><sup>−1</sup> = 0.9 was shown by DUT-4 for benzene, MIL-101(Cr) for cyclohexane and DUT-5 for <i>n</i>-hexane. In the low-pressure range from p p<sub>0</sub><sup>−1</sup> = 0.1 down to 0.05 the highest benzene uptake is given by DUT-5, DUT-67/UiO-67 and MIL-101(Cr), for cyclohexane and <i>n</i>-hexane by DUT-5, UiO-67 and MIL-101(Cr). The highest uptake capacity at p p<sub>0</sub><sup>−1</sup> = 0.02 was seen with MIL-53 for benzene, MIL-125 for cyclohexane and DUT-5 for <i>n</i>-hexane. DUT-5 and MIL-101(Cr) are the MOFs with the widest pore window openings/cross sections but the low-pressure uptake seems to be controlled by a complex combination of ligand and pore-size effect. IAST selectivities between the three binary mixtures show a finely tuned and difficult to predict interplay of pore window size with (critical) adsorptive size and possibly a role of electrostatics through functional groups such as NH<sub>2</sub>.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/12/20/3614metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs)vapor adsorptionC<sub>6</sub> volatile organic compounds (VOCs)benzene adsorptioncyclohexane adsorption
spellingShingle Christian Jansen
Nabil Assahub
Alex Spieß
Jun Liang
Alexa Schmitz
Shanghua Xing
Serkan Gökpinar
Christoph Janiak
The Complexity of Comparative Adsorption of C<sub>6</sub> Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Cyclohexane, <em>n</em>-Hexane) at Metal–Organic Frameworks
Nanomaterials
metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)
zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs)
vapor adsorption
C<sub>6</sub> volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
benzene adsorption
cyclohexane adsorption
title The Complexity of Comparative Adsorption of C<sub>6</sub> Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Cyclohexane, <em>n</em>-Hexane) at Metal–Organic Frameworks
title_full The Complexity of Comparative Adsorption of C<sub>6</sub> Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Cyclohexane, <em>n</em>-Hexane) at Metal–Organic Frameworks
title_fullStr The Complexity of Comparative Adsorption of C<sub>6</sub> Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Cyclohexane, <em>n</em>-Hexane) at Metal–Organic Frameworks
title_full_unstemmed The Complexity of Comparative Adsorption of C<sub>6</sub> Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Cyclohexane, <em>n</em>-Hexane) at Metal–Organic Frameworks
title_short The Complexity of Comparative Adsorption of C<sub>6</sub> Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Cyclohexane, <em>n</em>-Hexane) at Metal–Organic Frameworks
title_sort complexity of comparative adsorption of c sub 6 sub hydrocarbons benzene cyclohexane em n em hexane at metal organic frameworks
topic metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)
zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs)
vapor adsorption
C<sub>6</sub> volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
benzene adsorption
cyclohexane adsorption
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/12/20/3614
work_keys_str_mv AT christianjansen thecomplexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT nabilassahub thecomplexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT alexspieß thecomplexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT junliang thecomplexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT alexaschmitz thecomplexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT shanghuaxing thecomplexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT serkangokpinar thecomplexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT christophjaniak thecomplexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT christianjansen complexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT nabilassahub complexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT alexspieß complexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT junliang complexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT alexaschmitz complexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT shanghuaxing complexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT serkangokpinar complexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks
AT christophjaniak complexityofcomparativeadsorptionofcsub6subhydrocarbonsbenzenecyclohexaneemnemhexaneatmetalorganicframeworks