Aggregated Rankings of Top Leagues’ Football Teams: Application and Comparison of Different Ranking Methods

In this study, the effectiveness and characteristics of three ranking methods were investigated based on their performance in ranking European football teams. The investigated methods were the Thurstone method with ties, the analytic hierarchy process with logarithmic least squares method, and the R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: László Gyarmati, Éva Orbán-Mihálykó, Csaba Mihálykó, Ágnes Vathy-Fogarassy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/7/4556
_version_ 1827747097022038016
author László Gyarmati
Éva Orbán-Mihálykó
Csaba Mihálykó
Ágnes Vathy-Fogarassy
author_facet László Gyarmati
Éva Orbán-Mihálykó
Csaba Mihálykó
Ágnes Vathy-Fogarassy
author_sort László Gyarmati
collection DOAJ
description In this study, the effectiveness and characteristics of three ranking methods were investigated based on their performance in ranking European football teams. The investigated methods were the Thurstone method with ties, the analytic hierarchy process with logarithmic least squares method, and the RankNet neural network. The methods were analyzed in both complete and incomplete comparison tasks. The ranking based on complete comparison was performed on match results of national leagues, where each team had match results against all the other teams. In the incomplete comparison case, in addition to the national league results, only a few match results from international cups were available to determine the aggregated ranking of the teams playing in the top five European leagues. The rankings produced by the ranking methods were compared with each other, with the official national rankings, and with the UEFA club coefficient rankings. In addition, the correlation between the aggregated rankings and the Transfermarkt financial ranking was also examined for the sake of interest.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T05:42:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e880d66082e14eb1b7b88c7bcf6a9008
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T05:42:22Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e880d66082e14eb1b7b88c7bcf6a90082023-11-17T16:22:02ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172023-04-01137455610.3390/app13074556Aggregated Rankings of Top Leagues’ Football Teams: Application and Comparison of Different Ranking MethodsLászló Gyarmati0Éva Orbán-Mihálykó1Csaba Mihálykó2Ágnes Vathy-Fogarassy3Department of Mathematics, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10, 8200 Veszprém, HungaryDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10, 8200 Veszprém, HungaryDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10, 8200 Veszprém, HungaryDepartment of Computer Science and Systems Technology, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10, 8200 Veszprém, HungaryIn this study, the effectiveness and characteristics of three ranking methods were investigated based on their performance in ranking European football teams. The investigated methods were the Thurstone method with ties, the analytic hierarchy process with logarithmic least squares method, and the RankNet neural network. The methods were analyzed in both complete and incomplete comparison tasks. The ranking based on complete comparison was performed on match results of national leagues, where each team had match results against all the other teams. In the incomplete comparison case, in addition to the national league results, only a few match results from international cups were available to determine the aggregated ranking of the teams playing in the top five European leagues. The rankings produced by the ranking methods were compared with each other, with the official national rankings, and with the UEFA club coefficient rankings. In addition, the correlation between the aggregated rankings and the Transfermarkt financial ranking was also examined for the sake of interest.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/7/4556ranking aggregationanalytic hierarchy process (AHP)Thurstone methodRankNet neural networkevaluation of sports results
spellingShingle László Gyarmati
Éva Orbán-Mihálykó
Csaba Mihálykó
Ágnes Vathy-Fogarassy
Aggregated Rankings of Top Leagues’ Football Teams: Application and Comparison of Different Ranking Methods
Applied Sciences
ranking aggregation
analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
Thurstone method
RankNet neural network
evaluation of sports results
title Aggregated Rankings of Top Leagues’ Football Teams: Application and Comparison of Different Ranking Methods
title_full Aggregated Rankings of Top Leagues’ Football Teams: Application and Comparison of Different Ranking Methods
title_fullStr Aggregated Rankings of Top Leagues’ Football Teams: Application and Comparison of Different Ranking Methods
title_full_unstemmed Aggregated Rankings of Top Leagues’ Football Teams: Application and Comparison of Different Ranking Methods
title_short Aggregated Rankings of Top Leagues’ Football Teams: Application and Comparison of Different Ranking Methods
title_sort aggregated rankings of top leagues football teams application and comparison of different ranking methods
topic ranking aggregation
analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
Thurstone method
RankNet neural network
evaluation of sports results
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/7/4556
work_keys_str_mv AT laszlogyarmati aggregatedrankingsoftopleaguesfootballteamsapplicationandcomparisonofdifferentrankingmethods
AT evaorbanmihalyko aggregatedrankingsoftopleaguesfootballteamsapplicationandcomparisonofdifferentrankingmethods
AT csabamihalyko aggregatedrankingsoftopleaguesfootballteamsapplicationandcomparisonofdifferentrankingmethods
AT agnesvathyfogarassy aggregatedrankingsoftopleaguesfootballteamsapplicationandcomparisonofdifferentrankingmethods