The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools

Livestock operations in California face livestock losses due to a range of carnivore species. Simultaneously, there is an increased call to reduce the use of lethal predator control methods and replace them with nonlethal methods. Livestock guardian dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are one such nonleth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dan Macon, Carolyn Whitesell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2021-11-01
Series:California Fish and Wildlife Journal
Subjects:
_version_ 1818695362382135296
author Dan Macon
Carolyn Whitesell
author_facet Dan Macon
Carolyn Whitesell
author_sort Dan Macon
collection DOAJ
description Livestock operations in California face livestock losses due to a range of carnivore species. Simultaneously, there is an increased call to reduce the use of lethal predator control methods and replace them with nonlethal methods. Livestock guardian dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are one such nonlethal livestock protection tool (LPT), yet research is still lacking on the factors and situations that impact their effectiveness. Using three case studies, we demonstrate the value of objective analyses that explicitly address the inherent differences in ranch management, environment, and surrounding land uses in examining livestock guardian dogs as an LPT. We used semi-structured questionnaire surveys of livestock operators to collect information on effectiveness, behavior, and producer satisfaction of LGDs protecting poultry (Gallus gallus domesticus), calves (Bovus taurus), and sheep (Ovis aries) on private and public land and in conjunction with a variety of other livestock protection tools. We aimed to address all aspects related to the use of LGDs as a means of informing livestock operators’ decisions on whether LGDs are an appropriate tool for a particular operation. The case studies demonstrated the complexities involved in applying LGDs as a LPT within the context of a livestock operation. In two of the three case studies, LGDs did not entirely eliminate livestock losses yet operator satisfaction remained high.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T13:44:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e8810cff6eb847c28e6b607d5b424894
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2689-4203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T13:44:16Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher California Department of Fish and Wildlife
record_format Article
series California Fish and Wildlife Journal
spelling doaj.art-e8810cff6eb847c28e6b607d5b4248942022-12-21T21:46:12ZengCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeCalifornia Fish and Wildlife Journal2689-42032021-11-01107317318310.51492/cfwj.hwisi.3The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection toolsDan Macon0Carolyn Whitesell1University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesLivestock operations in California face livestock losses due to a range of carnivore species. Simultaneously, there is an increased call to reduce the use of lethal predator control methods and replace them with nonlethal methods. Livestock guardian dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are one such nonlethal livestock protection tool (LPT), yet research is still lacking on the factors and situations that impact their effectiveness. Using three case studies, we demonstrate the value of objective analyses that explicitly address the inherent differences in ranch management, environment, and surrounding land uses in examining livestock guardian dogs as an LPT. We used semi-structured questionnaire surveys of livestock operators to collect information on effectiveness, behavior, and producer satisfaction of LGDs protecting poultry (Gallus gallus domesticus), calves (Bovus taurus), and sheep (Ovis aries) on private and public land and in conjunction with a variety of other livestock protection tools. We aimed to address all aspects related to the use of LGDs as a means of informing livestock operators’ decisions on whether LGDs are an appropriate tool for a particular operation. The case studies demonstrated the complexities involved in applying LGDs as a LPT within the context of a livestock operation. In two of the three case studies, LGDs did not entirely eliminate livestock losses yet operator satisfaction remained high.human-wildlife coexistencelivestock depredationlivestock guardian doglivestock protection tools
spellingShingle Dan Macon
Carolyn Whitesell
The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
California Fish and Wildlife Journal
human-wildlife coexistence
livestock depredation
livestock guardian dog
livestock protection tools
title The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_full The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_fullStr The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_full_unstemmed The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_short The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_sort case for case studies a new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
topic human-wildlife coexistence
livestock depredation
livestock guardian dog
livestock protection tools
work_keys_str_mv AT danmacon thecaseforcasestudiesanewapproachtoevaluatingtheeffectivenessoflivestockprotectiontools
AT carolynwhitesell thecaseforcasestudiesanewapproachtoevaluatingtheeffectivenessoflivestockprotectiontools
AT danmacon caseforcasestudiesanewapproachtoevaluatingtheeffectivenessoflivestockprotectiontools
AT carolynwhitesell caseforcasestudiesanewapproachtoevaluatingtheeffectivenessoflivestockprotectiontools