Accuracy of linear mandibular measurements on conventional and cone beam computed tomography reconstructed panoramic radiographs
Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the precision of dimensional measurements in digital panoramic radiographs (PRs) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated panoramic images. Materials and Methods: Ten dry human mandibles were subjected to direct anthropometric...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Orofacial Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jofs.in/article.asp?issn=0975-8844;year=2023;volume=15;issue=2;spage=120;epage=126;aulast=Chauhan |
| _version_ | 1797300054145368064 |
|---|---|
| author | Nidhi Pathak Chauhan Nanditha Sujir Anindita Saha Deepak Chauhan Junaid Ahmed Keerthilatha Muralidhar Pai |
| author_facet | Nidhi Pathak Chauhan Nanditha Sujir Anindita Saha Deepak Chauhan Junaid Ahmed Keerthilatha Muralidhar Pai |
| author_sort | Nidhi Pathak Chauhan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the precision of dimensional measurements in digital panoramic radiographs (PRs) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated panoramic images. Materials and Methods: Ten dry human mandibles were subjected to direct anthropometric measurements, digital panoramic radiography, and CBCT scans. Vertical and horizontal measurements were made between predetermined points by two observers. Paired t-test was applied for the comparative analysis. p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done followed by post-hoc Bonferroni test to correlate the measurements got by the three modalities. Results: Except for two vertical measurements (V2 and V4) there was statistically significant difference in relation to all the measurements. The highest mean difference was observed in relation to H4, which was 12.60 mm lesser on digital PR in comparison to the anatomic measurements. Also, except for two vertical measurements V1 and V5, all the other measurements were underestimated by the digital PR.Conclusion: Measurement done in reconstructed PR and digital PRs in the region of posterior tooth-bearing region and condylar region are statistically similar. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T23:00:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e89d78adb3314baea61a914a0800b495 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0975-8844 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T23:00:39Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Orofacial Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-e89d78adb3314baea61a914a0800b4952024-02-22T15:03:50ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Orofacial Sciences0975-88442023-01-0115212012610.4103/jofs.jofs_305_22Accuracy of linear mandibular measurements on conventional and cone beam computed tomography reconstructed panoramic radiographsNidhi Pathak ChauhanNanditha SujirAnindita SahaDeepak ChauhanJunaid AhmedKeerthilatha Muralidhar PaiIntroduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the precision of dimensional measurements in digital panoramic radiographs (PRs) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated panoramic images. Materials and Methods: Ten dry human mandibles were subjected to direct anthropometric measurements, digital panoramic radiography, and CBCT scans. Vertical and horizontal measurements were made between predetermined points by two observers. Paired t-test was applied for the comparative analysis. p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done followed by post-hoc Bonferroni test to correlate the measurements got by the three modalities. Results: Except for two vertical measurements (V2 and V4) there was statistically significant difference in relation to all the measurements. The highest mean difference was observed in relation to H4, which was 12.60 mm lesser on digital PR in comparison to the anatomic measurements. Also, except for two vertical measurements V1 and V5, all the other measurements were underestimated by the digital PR.Conclusion: Measurement done in reconstructed PR and digital PRs in the region of posterior tooth-bearing region and condylar region are statistically similar.http://www.jofs.in/article.asp?issn=0975-8844;year=2023;volume=15;issue=2;spage=120;epage=126;aulast=Chauhancone beam computed tomographyradiographypanoramicdimensional measurement accuracyreconstructed panoramic radiographmandible |
| spellingShingle | Nidhi Pathak Chauhan Nanditha Sujir Anindita Saha Deepak Chauhan Junaid Ahmed Keerthilatha Muralidhar Pai Accuracy of linear mandibular measurements on conventional and cone beam computed tomography reconstructed panoramic radiographs Journal of Orofacial Sciences cone beam computed tomography radiography panoramic dimensional measurement accuracy reconstructed panoramic radiograph mandible |
| title | Accuracy of linear mandibular measurements on conventional and cone beam computed tomography reconstructed panoramic radiographs |
| title_full | Accuracy of linear mandibular measurements on conventional and cone beam computed tomography reconstructed panoramic radiographs |
| title_fullStr | Accuracy of linear mandibular measurements on conventional and cone beam computed tomography reconstructed panoramic radiographs |
| title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of linear mandibular measurements on conventional and cone beam computed tomography reconstructed panoramic radiographs |
| title_short | Accuracy of linear mandibular measurements on conventional and cone beam computed tomography reconstructed panoramic radiographs |
| title_sort | accuracy of linear mandibular measurements on conventional and cone beam computed tomography reconstructed panoramic radiographs |
| topic | cone beam computed tomography radiography panoramic dimensional measurement accuracy reconstructed panoramic radiograph mandible |
| url | http://www.jofs.in/article.asp?issn=0975-8844;year=2023;volume=15;issue=2;spage=120;epage=126;aulast=Chauhan |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nidhipathakchauhan accuracyoflinearmandibularmeasurementsonconventionalandconebeamcomputedtomographyreconstructedpanoramicradiographs AT nandithasujir accuracyoflinearmandibularmeasurementsonconventionalandconebeamcomputedtomographyreconstructedpanoramicradiographs AT aninditasaha accuracyoflinearmandibularmeasurementsonconventionalandconebeamcomputedtomographyreconstructedpanoramicradiographs AT deepakchauhan accuracyoflinearmandibularmeasurementsonconventionalandconebeamcomputedtomographyreconstructedpanoramicradiographs AT junaidahmed accuracyoflinearmandibularmeasurementsonconventionalandconebeamcomputedtomographyreconstructedpanoramicradiographs AT keerthilathamuralidharpai accuracyoflinearmandibularmeasurementsonconventionalandconebeamcomputedtomographyreconstructedpanoramicradiographs |